Addendum 24th January 2016
Origins of our deceptive & deceiving language:
http://tabublog.com/2015/12/28/5979/
The word-smith fallacy:
https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2016/01/23/the-word-smith-fallacy/#comments
-------------------------------------end------------------------------------------------------
This work sits comfortably alongside my earlier post about governments.
I will start this with a post from another blogger called Clint Richardson. Not that I would presume to compare myself with Clint by any means. He has a large body of good work, and I am a mere greenhorn amateur by his standards.
Origins of our deceptive & deceiving language:
http://tabublog.com/2015/12/28/5979/
The word-smith fallacy:
https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2016/01/23/the-word-smith-fallacy/#comments
-------------------------------------end------------------------------------------------------
This work sits comfortably alongside my earlier post about governments.
I will start this with a post from another blogger called Clint Richardson. Not that I would presume to compare myself with Clint by any means. He has a large body of good work, and I am a mere greenhorn amateur by his standards.
Although his name did attract me, he has the same surname as my mother. His brief bio is on the tab at the very top "Who am I?". The first lines of his bio:
"Clint Richardson is my real name. I stand up and take responsibility for any and all content and actions by myself. No Pseudo, corporate, or stage names necessary. For I am living without straw."
That sounds good to me. Same goes for me too, apart from the straw. This "straw" bit will become clearer as you read on.
You should probably read his bio first, it is not very long. Certainly I hope that it doesn't put you off from reading this, longish, work by me. I can confidently say that you will learn something worth knowing if you hear me out.
Here is his Clint's recent piece:
Legalism: A Civil Life Without Moral Concious
https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2015/09/30/legalism-a-civil-life-without-moral-conscious/
And here are 3 quotes from Clint's piece, my emphasis:
"The legalistic view is one of an insurable lack of conscious responsibility, of licensed innocence from duty. With this recycling meme, the ceremonial act of disposing of that which should have never been created in the first place triggers a chemical reaction in the brain that replaces moral thought with a self-similar non sequitur. Logic is tempered into false reasoning, and the crime is justified through the fallacious notion of solving the problem while at the same time actively being the creator of it."
and
"The expression of moral will has been trumped by social engineering, and the legal foundation of law, which is opposed to all forms of natural law, makes moral action impossible. We have been transformed into automatons, reprogrammed for optimal performance without conscious application of mind."
and
"In the end, it seems every facet of personal responsibility has been monetized and insured and re-insured. Nature is only a trade-able commodity, as are apparently aborted fetuses and body parts of the living and dead adult population. Nothing is sacred in legal consideration, because everything has a value in this system of mammon (money), especially the heads (capita) of men. Capitalism is only human trafficking, commerce in souls, counting us all by the head as human resources to be exacted and extorted from according to our usage of natural resources.
Meanwhile, the hungry remain hungry, the homeless remain without homes, and the Red Cross and United Way continue to suck billions from that stagnant pond of legal citizens seeking to buy their way out of the laws of nature through legal, monetary means.
But hey, at least we get a colorful rubber bracelet for our legal, monetary efforts, so that we can show our social network that we care!"
There is much more in the piece.
The fact that Nature has become a "trade-able commodity", as Clint puts it, is central to our evident loss of direction as a species. It truly is madness by any objective analysis. And it is at the root of our destructive ways I feel. But it is the norm now, and it is against all of our interests as potentially free human beings.
I say potentially free because I think that 2 of the biggest causes of this evident loss of direction, and loss of human freedom, are hidden in plain sight. We need to open our eyes to the reality of our existence, and not rely only on what the media, or government controlled education, tells us.
Those 2 causes are our system of money, and our legal system. This piece will address some fundamentals about the latter, our legal system. Fundamentals that you will not hear about in any government educational institute. Our system of money will have to wait for another day, but I can assure you that it is a similar, actually worse, situation there.
I suggest a pause for thought here. This second part of my piece leads us down the rabbit hole somewhat. I suggest that you read Clint's link above before reading on. It is useful background to this next section. It touches upon both our money and our legal systems. Please pay particular attention to his use of the words law and legal. Most people think they are the same, but they are not. They are 2 different things, which I will try to explain in this next section.
What follows is in 4 sections:
1 Your legal fiction, your strawman
2 Sources, for those that want to know more
3 Legal fiction ownership in the US
4 Legal fiction subjects in the UK
I hope that you get to the end because section 4 exposes our shackles here in the UK.
1. Your legal fiction, your strawman
When Clint talks in his piece about "natural law" and "legal fiction", or "fictions of law that display the unimaginably lifeless properties of personification", then he is referring to the fact that each of us has 2 identities, as follows:
1. Our lawful existence as human beings. Pete the human being, the flesh and blood me, subject to the law; natural, or Gods, law that is, which stops you harming other humans, or their property. No belief in God is actually required for this, thank god. Natural law is human law and it applies to all humans, pretty well everywhere.
I say potentially free because I think that 2 of the biggest causes of this evident loss of direction, and loss of human freedom, are hidden in plain sight. We need to open our eyes to the reality of our existence, and not rely only on what the media, or government controlled education, tells us.
Those 2 causes are our system of money, and our legal system. This piece will address some fundamentals about the latter, our legal system. Fundamentals that you will not hear about in any government educational institute. Our system of money will have to wait for another day, but I can assure you that it is a similar, actually worse, situation there.
I suggest a pause for thought here. This second part of my piece leads us down the rabbit hole somewhat. I suggest that you read Clint's link above before reading on. It is useful background to this next section. It touches upon both our money and our legal systems. Please pay particular attention to his use of the words law and legal. Most people think they are the same, but they are not. They are 2 different things, which I will try to explain in this next section.
What follows is in 4 sections:
1 Your legal fiction, your strawman
2 Sources, for those that want to know more
3 Legal fiction ownership in the US
4 Legal fiction subjects in the UK
I hope that you get to the end because section 4 exposes our shackles here in the UK.
1. Your legal fiction, your strawman
When Clint talks in his piece about "natural law" and "legal fiction", or "fictions of law that display the unimaginably lifeless properties of personification", then he is referring to the fact that each of us has 2 identities, as follows:
1. Our lawful existence as human beings. Pete the human being, the flesh and blood me, subject to the law; natural, or Gods, law that is, which stops you harming other humans, or their property. No belief in God is actually required for this, thank god. Natural law is human law and it applies to all humans, pretty well everywhere.
2. Our legal fiction existence. PETE [all caps] the legal construct, my strawman, my legal shadow, subject to legal statute. The stuff that all governments use to coerce you, and take your money off you. Legal statute is not for humans, it is for strawmen, for your legal fiction. Fiction being a very appropriate word to use. Because it is not real, it is not flesh and blood. It is a legal construct, something in your mind, or written in documents, only. Literally a legal fiction. This will become clearer as we proceed, I hope.
Read those two definitions again carefully before carrying on. And be aware that natural law is always superior to the legal system. Well it has clear seniority, because it came first, and it applies to human beings, not to strawmen.
Now here is the rub. Your legal fiction does not exist when you are born. It is created with your birth certificate! The registration of your birth with the government is what creates the fiction. This is true in both the US & UK, and most countries in the world I suppose. I repeat, you are assigned your legal fiction when your parents register your birth. Which is not something that anyone of us had much of a say in!
This legal fiction existence, that we all have, is something that nobody is ever told about, by anyone in authority, ever. Do think that there may be a good reason why we are never told? I expect that you will if you manage to reach the end of this piece.
Well, you may say, so what? What difference does it make?
Stop and think for a moment. Under natural/gods/human law then, any, and all, contracts that exist between 2 parties are valid only if both parties consent. And both parties usually signify that consent by signing a contract agreement, although that is not essential, verbal agreement will suffice. Do you remember doing that when you were a week old? Do you remember ever being asked, when you were a week old, or even when you got to pay your first tax, whether you agreed to your legal fiction, your contract with the government, that was created by your birth certificate? Did you ever have a choice, to opt in, or opt out, after weighing up the pros and cons? No, of course not. You were not told, or asked, nobody ever is.
Stop and think for another moment. What I am saying is that you were contracted to the government by the creation of your birth certificate when you were, at most, a few weeks old. And that the government never told you about that contract. And that the contract binds you to them for the rest of your life. You must obey all their statutes and pay all their taxes, fines, fees etc etc. All based on your birth certificate. which registers you, or your legal fiction, in their system of control.
Do you think that this is fair and equitable? You might, I certainly don't.
And, like I said, they never tell you about this, never. They want you to think that both your lawful and legal identities are one and the same. But they are most definitely not.
It is very clever, they even use the same words, the difference being that lower case is law, and all higher case is LEGAL. I will come to that later [if you get that far!] But as quick evidence then, check any of the following for yourself:
* credit card
* bank statement
* any financial documents
Your name is always written in all higher case, or capital letters. Because it is not the living, breathing you that is contracting, it is your legal fiction, your strawman.
All governments hate natural/Gods/human law, because it is beyond their control. But they love legal fiction, because they create that, and they can use it to control you.
Can you see why that is? If not then I suggest that you read this section over again.
To sum up then: You were inducted into the governments legal fiction identity shortly after you were born, without your knowledge, but in a way that binds you to them for the rest of your life.
Ever feel that you've been had? I know that I did when I first found out about all this.
I can understand that many people will say that this is all an arcane, academic, irrelevance. What does it really matter? I would reply that, if the government can mislead everybody about such a fundamental aspect of our relationship to them then, what else do they mislead you about?
The more fundamental point is that your legal fiction is in direct conflict with natural human law for the reason that I explained earlier. No contract is valid without the consent of both parties. And you never consciously gave that consent did you? Maybe you did technically by signing your tax return, or something similar. But that is pure artifice, you never really gave your consent, because you were never told! How can you consent to something that you don't know about?
Maybe you think that government is a good thing for you, that it is always on your side. There surely must be some doubt in your mind after you just learned about your legal fiction, and its use as a legal, but not lawful, human control mechanism.
Particularly so if you understand who it is that actually controls governments.
And no, I'm not talking about David effin Cameron, or the House of effin Commons. But that is a whole other story, one that will have to wait for another day :-))
2. Sources, for those that want to learn more:
I can recommend Clint's archive to learn more about this. It is a resource written in laymans terms for those that want to understand the nature of the legal fiction con that shackles us all to our government for the whole of our natural life.
Specifically the STRAWMAN links. And, for those with a head for figures, the CAFR links.
Here are his 2 key STRAWMAN pieces. They are expressed in straightforward terms and reasonably easy to understand. I found that listening to the audioblog, whilst reading the words, was useful. He includes all his source links, which are extensive:
https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/killing-your-strawman-the-path-to-freedom/
https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/killing-your-strawman-2-a-free-mans-chronicle/
These pieces explain how it is possible to kill your strawman in the US. To become truly free from government control. Clint recommends a year of serious study before anyone attempts that.
Please note that Clint's analysis of the strawman, or legal fiction, in these 2 links is all about the US. He goes right down the rabbit hole too, see this next section for my summary.
3. Legal fiction ownership in the US
You may want to have a look at the 2 links immediately above to understand this summary better.
Firstly, in the US, each legal fiction person is capitalized as a corporation, or company! Yes, each and every citizen is also a corporation, or at least their legal fiction is. Their birth certificate is their certificate of incorporation as a company! Each new born baby is currently capitalized at ~$7 million. And the exact value of an individuals legal fiction corporation is readily available from any stockbroker, who can look it up using the birth certificate number. Wow! I knew that the yanks were into money, but this surely takes the biscuit?
Further, each individuals legal fiction person/corporation, all the PETEs, SHARONs, DAVEs, JANEs, etc etc etc are owned by the UNITED STATES corporation, which is not the same thing as the United States country! [Each time, same words, different meaning, signified by the capitals]. So every citizen of the United States, the country [no caps], is also, in effect, an indentured slave of the UNITED STATES, the corporation [all caps], or at least their legal fiction is. And most US citizens have no idea about it whatsoever, they are never told. Double wow! Corporatocracy or what?
Furthermore, all the legal fiction person/corporations, all the PETEs, SHARONs, DAVEs, JANEs, etc etc etc, and the UNITED STATES corporation itself, are registered and owned in Washington DC, which is most definitely not actually lawfully, or physically, part of the country, the United States! So it is outside US law. Triple wow! Fallen off my chair just now.
Who owns it all then? Take a deep breath before quadruple wow.
You'll have to read Clint's 2 pieces to find that out :-))
But cynics like me, who have some knowledge of the Perfidious Albion deep state, will not be surprised.
But if you can't be bothered with Clint's 2 links then you'll get some big clues in this final section.
4. Legal fiction subjects in the UK
It is certainly different here in the UK, each legal fiction person here has a similar, but different basis to the US. The birth certificate is still the key document, it still creates your legal fiction. But each legal fiction person here is a subject, of the British Crown, I think. Is that the same as owned by? It probably is in practice.
I need to do more research on this, that is because I am not as clear in my mind about the UK, as I am for the situation in the US thanks to people like Clint.
Certainly, the Crown is not the monarch herself, as most people think. It implies the Queen, but is not her, it is something else. The Crown is part of the Crown Temple, which is a private club, an Establishment institution. It is a partnership which has membership by invitation only. It is a secret society if you like, with no written rules, or public face. Typically British then.
The Queen is a member, and I bet that the Rothschilds are too. The Crown is certainly part of the Crown Temple, in the City of London, which is also most definitely not actually lawfully, or physically, part of the country, the United Kingdom! So it is outside UK law.
A major elite watering hole then, in a different country to you or I. So it is not subject to the same law as you or I, but that controls the UK legal system that we all have to live by. The same legal system that shackles us all for life to our governors, our government. The same legal system that you were signed up for without your knowledge.
Does that sound reasonable to you?
Wtf? Crown? Temple? Yes, the Crown Temple.
Here is an informative link about the Crown Temple:
http://windowsontheworld.net/2014/10/the-crown-templars-ruling-by-assumption/
Not the video, the article that follows: By Rule of Mystery Babylon
This piece is also primarily about the US, but there is an overview of the Crown Temple within it. The Crown Temple is the epicenter of the whole worlds legal system.
I know that this article may be a stretch too far for some, and I am certainly not testifying to it's veracity, although it does confirm quite a few of Clint's points. I am only pointing you to 3 of its sections to explain some more about the Crown, and the Crown Temple, viz
"The Templars of the Crown", at the start,
"Definitions you never knew", which elaborates on the meaning of legal words and,
"The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple" which further elaborates about the Crown
Although the section:
"Websters 1928 Dictionary" is worth a look too.
The rest of the piece is interesting, but gets into the US constitution, the Roman Church based at the Vatican, the Wizard of Oz, yes really, and some religious stuff.
Well, considering that the Vatican in Rome is also not actually lawfully, or physically, part of the country, Italy! Then that completes the set, wouldn't you say? :-))
So I've told you about the Vatican in Rome, the City of London and Washington DC. They are the worlds 3 key centers for human control, or human farming if you like. In order of importance too, according to my final link.
Think of them like the 3 head offices of the Global Human Farmers Private Partnership :-))
Whatever, read the links and judge for yourself.
Confused by all this? Well that's exactly what they want you to be. But hopefully you will have learned something from this blog. You will learn even more if you follow the links too. You will never learn about this shit from any government, or any of their institutions of learning, that's for sure.
Maybe a trained lawyer will blow all this final section up with some logic and precision. I'm not precious, at least I try not to be. I will happily retract if I am proved wrong. But I'll not hold my breath whilst waiting. My guess is that most lawyers are not properly told about any of this either.
Read those two definitions again carefully before carrying on. And be aware that natural law is always superior to the legal system. Well it has clear seniority, because it came first, and it applies to human beings, not to strawmen.
Now here is the rub. Your legal fiction does not exist when you are born. It is created with your birth certificate! The registration of your birth with the government is what creates the fiction. This is true in both the US & UK, and most countries in the world I suppose. I repeat, you are assigned your legal fiction when your parents register your birth. Which is not something that anyone of us had much of a say in!
This legal fiction existence, that we all have, is something that nobody is ever told about, by anyone in authority, ever. Do think that there may be a good reason why we are never told? I expect that you will if you manage to reach the end of this piece.
Well, you may say, so what? What difference does it make?
Stop and think for a moment. Under natural/gods/human law then, any, and all, contracts that exist between 2 parties are valid only if both parties consent. And both parties usually signify that consent by signing a contract agreement, although that is not essential, verbal agreement will suffice. Do you remember doing that when you were a week old? Do you remember ever being asked, when you were a week old, or even when you got to pay your first tax, whether you agreed to your legal fiction, your contract with the government, that was created by your birth certificate? Did you ever have a choice, to opt in, or opt out, after weighing up the pros and cons? No, of course not. You were not told, or asked, nobody ever is.
Stop and think for another moment. What I am saying is that you were contracted to the government by the creation of your birth certificate when you were, at most, a few weeks old. And that the government never told you about that contract. And that the contract binds you to them for the rest of your life. You must obey all their statutes and pay all their taxes, fines, fees etc etc. All based on your birth certificate. which registers you, or your legal fiction, in their system of control.
Do you think that this is fair and equitable? You might, I certainly don't.
And, like I said, they never tell you about this, never. They want you to think that both your lawful and legal identities are one and the same. But they are most definitely not.
It is very clever, they even use the same words, the difference being that lower case is law, and all higher case is LEGAL. I will come to that later [if you get that far!] But as quick evidence then, check any of the following for yourself:
* credit card
* bank statement
* any financial documents
Your name is always written in all higher case, or capital letters. Because it is not the living, breathing you that is contracting, it is your legal fiction, your strawman.
All governments hate natural/Gods/human law, because it is beyond their control. But they love legal fiction, because they create that, and they can use it to control you.
Can you see why that is? If not then I suggest that you read this section over again.
To sum up then: You were inducted into the governments legal fiction identity shortly after you were born, without your knowledge, but in a way that binds you to them for the rest of your life.
Ever feel that you've been had? I know that I did when I first found out about all this.
I can understand that many people will say that this is all an arcane, academic, irrelevance. What does it really matter? I would reply that, if the government can mislead everybody about such a fundamental aspect of our relationship to them then, what else do they mislead you about?
The more fundamental point is that your legal fiction is in direct conflict with natural human law for the reason that I explained earlier. No contract is valid without the consent of both parties. And you never consciously gave that consent did you? Maybe you did technically by signing your tax return, or something similar. But that is pure artifice, you never really gave your consent, because you were never told! How can you consent to something that you don't know about?
Maybe you think that government is a good thing for you, that it is always on your side. There surely must be some doubt in your mind after you just learned about your legal fiction, and its use as a legal, but not lawful, human control mechanism.
Particularly so if you understand who it is that actually controls governments.
And no, I'm not talking about David effin Cameron, or the House of effin Commons. But that is a whole other story, one that will have to wait for another day :-))
2. Sources, for those that want to learn more:
I can recommend Clint's archive to learn more about this. It is a resource written in laymans terms for those that want to understand the nature of the legal fiction con that shackles us all to our government for the whole of our natural life.
Specifically the STRAWMAN links. And, for those with a head for figures, the CAFR links.
Here are his 2 key STRAWMAN pieces. They are expressed in straightforward terms and reasonably easy to understand. I found that listening to the audioblog, whilst reading the words, was useful. He includes all his source links, which are extensive:
https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/killing-your-strawman-the-path-to-freedom/
https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/killing-your-strawman-2-a-free-mans-chronicle/
These pieces explain how it is possible to kill your strawman in the US. To become truly free from government control. Clint recommends a year of serious study before anyone attempts that.
Please note that Clint's analysis of the strawman, or legal fiction, in these 2 links is all about the US. He goes right down the rabbit hole too, see this next section for my summary.
3. Legal fiction ownership in the US
You may want to have a look at the 2 links immediately above to understand this summary better.
Firstly, in the US, each legal fiction person is capitalized as a corporation, or company! Yes, each and every citizen is also a corporation, or at least their legal fiction is. Their birth certificate is their certificate of incorporation as a company! Each new born baby is currently capitalized at ~$7 million. And the exact value of an individuals legal fiction corporation is readily available from any stockbroker, who can look it up using the birth certificate number. Wow! I knew that the yanks were into money, but this surely takes the biscuit?
Further, each individuals legal fiction person/corporation, all the PETEs, SHARONs, DAVEs, JANEs, etc etc etc are owned by the UNITED STATES corporation, which is not the same thing as the United States country! [Each time, same words, different meaning, signified by the capitals]. So every citizen of the United States, the country [no caps], is also, in effect, an indentured slave of the UNITED STATES, the corporation [all caps], or at least their legal fiction is. And most US citizens have no idea about it whatsoever, they are never told. Double wow! Corporatocracy or what?
Furthermore, all the legal fiction person/corporations, all the PETEs, SHARONs, DAVEs, JANEs, etc etc etc, and the UNITED STATES corporation itself, are registered and owned in Washington DC, which is most definitely not actually lawfully, or physically, part of the country, the United States! So it is outside US law. Triple wow! Fallen off my chair just now.
Who owns it all then? Take a deep breath before quadruple wow.
You'll have to read Clint's 2 pieces to find that out :-))
But cynics like me, who have some knowledge of the Perfidious Albion deep state, will not be surprised.
But if you can't be bothered with Clint's 2 links then you'll get some big clues in this final section.
4. Legal fiction subjects in the UK
It is certainly different here in the UK, each legal fiction person here has a similar, but different basis to the US. The birth certificate is still the key document, it still creates your legal fiction. But each legal fiction person here is a subject, of the British Crown, I think. Is that the same as owned by? It probably is in practice.
I need to do more research on this, that is because I am not as clear in my mind about the UK, as I am for the situation in the US thanks to people like Clint.
Certainly, the Crown is not the monarch herself, as most people think. It implies the Queen, but is not her, it is something else. The Crown is part of the Crown Temple, which is a private club, an Establishment institution. It is a partnership which has membership by invitation only. It is a secret society if you like, with no written rules, or public face. Typically British then.
The Queen is a member, and I bet that the Rothschilds are too. The Crown is certainly part of the Crown Temple, in the City of London, which is also most definitely not actually lawfully, or physically, part of the country, the United Kingdom! So it is outside UK law.
A major elite watering hole then, in a different country to you or I. So it is not subject to the same law as you or I, but that controls the UK legal system that we all have to live by. The same legal system that shackles us all for life to our governors, our government. The same legal system that you were signed up for without your knowledge.
Does that sound reasonable to you?
Wtf? Crown? Temple? Yes, the Crown Temple.
Here is an informative link about the Crown Temple:
http://windowsontheworld.net/2014/10/the-crown-templars-ruling-by-assumption/
Not the video, the article that follows: By Rule of Mystery Babylon
This piece is also primarily about the US, but there is an overview of the Crown Temple within it. The Crown Temple is the epicenter of the whole worlds legal system.
I know that this article may be a stretch too far for some, and I am certainly not testifying to it's veracity, although it does confirm quite a few of Clint's points. I am only pointing you to 3 of its sections to explain some more about the Crown, and the Crown Temple, viz
"The Templars of the Crown", at the start,
"Definitions you never knew", which elaborates on the meaning of legal words and,
"The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple" which further elaborates about the Crown
Although the section:
"Websters 1928 Dictionary" is worth a look too.
The rest of the piece is interesting, but gets into the US constitution, the Roman Church based at the Vatican, the Wizard of Oz, yes really, and some religious stuff.
Well, considering that the Vatican in Rome is also not actually lawfully, or physically, part of the country, Italy! Then that completes the set, wouldn't you say? :-))
So I've told you about the Vatican in Rome, the City of London and Washington DC. They are the worlds 3 key centers for human control, or human farming if you like. In order of importance too, according to my final link.
Think of them like the 3 head offices of the Global Human Farmers Private Partnership :-))
Whatever, read the links and judge for yourself.
Confused by all this? Well that's exactly what they want you to be. But hopefully you will have learned something from this blog. You will learn even more if you follow the links too. You will never learn about this shit from any government, or any of their institutions of learning, that's for sure.
Maybe a trained lawyer will blow all this final section up with some logic and precision. I'm not precious, at least I try not to be. I will happily retract if I am proved wrong. But I'll not hold my breath whilst waiting. My guess is that most lawyers are not properly told about any of this either.
