Who said this about 9/11? Read this

Plus some thoughts on our false politics

Verbatim quotation:

“It wasn’t architectural defect. The WorldTradeCenter was always known as a very, very strong building. Don’t forget that took a big bomb in the basement [in 1993]. Now, the basement is the most vulnerable place because that’s your foundation, and it withstood that, and I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour, because he did the building, and I said, ‘I can’t believe it.’ The building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out, so this was an unbelievably powerful building. If you don’t know anything about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. The steel, the reason the WorldTradeCenter had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows, you had the steel on the outside, so you had the steel on the outside of the building. That’s why when I first looked, and you had these big heavy I-beams, when I first looked at it, I couldn’t believe it because there was a hole in the steel, and this is steel that was… You remember the width of the windows of the WorldTradeCenter, folks. I think you know if you were ever up there, they were quite narrow and in between was this heavy steel. I said how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously, because I just can’t imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steel on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have, and it was almost just like a can of soup.

“I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think, obviously, they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly, because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it’s getting the speed from going down hill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane, because you’re talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on the building. Well, these buildings were rock-solid, and you know it’s just an amazing, amazing thing. This country is different today and it’s going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.”

It was Donald Trump, here is the proof:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w

Yes "The Donald", the newly selected US front man. Whatever you might think of him, he is not stupid. And he knows about skyscraper construction. That is for sure.

Did you know that all the votes in the US "presidential" election are made, and counted, by computer? The so called voting machines.

And that there is no effective supervision of the software used by the machines and no audit trail from these machines. They are black boxes that provide no verification of individual votes. So there is no proof possible that any individual vote was counted properly. And so no proof that the declared election numbers are accurate.

The voting machines are provided by 3 or 4 private companies. One of which is owned by George Soros! Yes him.

The machines were introduced after the 2000 "election" that gave us George "W" Bush as US "president". The halfwit Bush scion who was obviously not intelligent enough to decide anything important. He was proof positive that they are all puppets I think.

The 2000 election ran a psyop that led to the introduction of the voting machines. Florida was the key state. Remember the "hanging chads" that the lamestream media hammered on about for weeks after the 2000 "presidential election"? That was the psyop. In fact Florida had been a Republican gerrymandered state for decades before 2000. They could fix any election result that they wanted. They usually did too, so there was no need to make all the fuss about the chads.

So why did they fuss about "hanging chads"? It was to discredit paper ballots and facilitate the introduction of the voting machines. And it worked. Machines are used in all the US states now.

The lack of an audit trail means that the bad guys can declare any number that they want for the votes cast and counted. There is no proof at all! Do they even count the votes? I doubt it. They can sit in their penthouses, or in their country estates, or on their private islands, and declare any number they want. Why bother to count at all?

The winner is selected, not elected. It is obvious if you really think about it. There are many, many, reasons why it is obvious. This is just one of them.


Yet US people, and even UK people, fired up by the relentless media promotion, get very excited about the charade. And surprised when the unbelievably corrupt, psychopathic, war mongering, allegedly "progressive", social justice warrior, favourite loses "unexpectedly".

And what about all those hilarious predictions of doom, wailing and gnashing of teeth, from all the "progressive" supporters when the TV actor, cartoon character, far-right madman unexpectedly "wins" the race. Come on - he's an actor ffs! He reads a script. No prizes for guessing who wrote the script either..... Ok he can ad lib very well, but he's appointing NeoCons to his administration it seems. Which will ensure continuity, as always.

It is all an obvious, blatant, charade for tv and media. None of it is real. None of it. Donald Trump and Bill Clinton are actually the best of mates. Donald and Bill both flew on Jeffrey Epsteins "Lolita Express". His paedophile orgy "fun plane". And visited his paedophile "sex slave" island. Google "Lolita Express" if you don't believe me, you will find plenty of links.

As for "progressive" Killary, Bills missus, she is a real piece of evil, in some ways worse than Bill. And with similar sexual preferences according to many accounts. Google "Clinton body count" and "Mena airport" and "Clinton foundation corruption".






The US president has been a very well remunerated US front man/teleprompter reader for decades, probably far longer. Most of the recent ones have been closely associated with the Bush crime syndicate. Certainly all of them since Reagan.


You think its really any different here in the UK? Of course it's not. Thatcher, Major and Bliar all made tens of millions, maybe more, after they left office. Pay offs for services rendered? Who knows. Cameron will probably do the same. But he has no real need, he is already stinking rich, Sam Cam is an Astor ffs.

Currently we have:

Exhibit #1 in the "right" corner - Terry "no balls" May. He was selected, not elected. He's gonna give us Brexit.

Exhibit #2 in the "left" corner - Tony "war criminal" Bliar with his new best pal John "grey man" Major. They are surely selected, which normal person wants anything to do with Bliar? They're gonna save us from Brexit.

Ha ha ha ha ha........ It's all bullshit

This selection by elites of the public face, the teleprompter reader, is yet another reason to ignore the false left/right dialectic that their media pumps 24/7.

Here is the first rule of corporate media promotion:

If it's heavily promoted in the corporate media then, it's probably bullshit. It's probably not true.

So the most important issue is not the constantly media promoted: left v right.

It is something that they rarely talk about in the media: us v them.

The people v the hidden elites and their placemen.

Finally, listen to Larry. He tells it like it is:

"Say No to the System" - Larry Pinkney

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAZmmExQqZk

Wagging the Moon doggie

Was it an earlier psyop? Read this and judge for yourself

Most half awake people now realise that we are constantly being manipulated by The Powers that Shouldn't Be, via their corporate, and other, media. They run psyops on us all the time.

ISIS being a current case in point. It was created, and it is fully owned and closely managed, by the Western bad guys and their proxies. It is an Empire brand. Same as Al Qaeda was. This is all thoroughly documented if you care to do the research, as usual mainly not in TPTSB media of course.

So how long have they been doing this sort of stuff?
Was it just since the internet era?
When did all this actually start?

Well, it has gone on for centuries I think Certainly in the 18th & 19th centuries, and very likely a lot earlier. The form of media used was different then, but they still ran their psyops.

The British elites are past masters. They taught the Americans all their techniques too. The British elites "Security Services" even set up the CIA for the US in 1946.

The British are not known as "Perfidious Albion" for nothing.

So, in truth, all of our official, academic, ie. TPTSB, "history" needs reappraisal.


By way of illustration lets have a look at one of the earliest "Conspiracy Theories" the very problematic "Moon Landings" of the late 1960's and early 1970's.

Please read all the following and then think it through for yourself:

Truthers do not usually believe that the moon landing story is true. Probably because they have been exposed to the plentiful logical analysis, which is freely available, and which shows numerous anomalies.

A cursory study of the science of the story is troubling. There are far too many scientific impossibilities for the story to be true.

NASA now admits that, for human travel through the intense radiation in space then extensive, and very heavy, lead protection is required for a human to survive.

On June 24, 2005, NASA made this rather remarkable admission: “NASA's Vision for Space
Exploration calls for a return to the Moon as preparation for even longer journeys to Mars and beyond. But there's a potential showstopper: radiation. Space beyond low-Earth orbit is awash with intense radiation from the Sun and from deep galactic sources such as supernovas …Finding a good shield is important.”

So how did they get through in the 1960's in their tin cans? How did they land in their tinfoil lunar module?

This is the real story killer. If they could go to the moon in 1960's then why can they not return in the 2010's?


The moonsuits were ridiculous as well. The temperatures on the moon are literally boiling in sunlight and freezing in darkness, with nothing in between. It is very hard to believe that the suits would last 5 minutes on the inhospitable lunar surface. Particularly when you realise that the suits had to be battery powered, there was no other power source. They must have had great batteries in the 1960's! Not. And especially with all that radiation, and all those high speed particles, bombarding down. Maybe they just got lucky and none came during the many hours that each mission spent on the moon, much of it outdoors in their suits.


And what about the, literally, tinfoil lunar landing craft with its one "lunar module descent engine" to slow it's descent? Rockets are not aircraft, they cannot be "piloted", they are far too unstable, especially single engine rockets. Modern hover drones all have multiple stability systems don't they.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descent_Propulsion_System

In fact the inherent impossibility of "piloting" a rocket was the subject of an in-joke about the first astronauts; as revealed in Tom Wolf's 1979 book "The Right Stuff".

The very first US astronauts, both Mercury and Apollo, were all ex-test pilots from the US airforce. And all US test pilots had very, very, big cajones. They were truly brave, very intensely trained, very cool under pressure, very high risk taking people when at work. They lived on the very edge, and many died in accidents when piloting dangerous and unstable planes that were under development by the military industrial complex. They were a breed apart. It is impossible to imagine any current air jockey accepting the risks that they routinely accepted.

Tom Wolf was spot on with his title. They certainly were made of the "Right Stuff".

Anyhow, the joke was that the non-astronaut test pilots labelled the astronauts "monkeys in a tin can". Why? Because they were not pilots when they went into space, they were passengers. The monkeys refers to the earliest passengers who went into space, before humans.

But we are expected to believe that all the lunar landing modules were piloted down to the moon's surface using a single engine propulsion system, like a rocket with a throttle. Does your common sense tells you anything?




There is another massive clue. That is the later life demeanor of Armstrong, the first man on the moon. If you look carefully at his late life interviews then you can see that he is very unsettled by the telling of the official story. He really looks like he is lying. He is very uncomfortable. Very. Some very interesting body language analysis has been done. His body language screams: "Lie!"


Most of the key aspects of the story could easily be false. They would have been quite easy to fake if necessary. Hollywood has essentially been under shadow government control since it's start in the early 20th century, certainly since the CIA was founded in 1946. Hollywood is an important component in the endless bullshit stories that they spin. It softens people up for their psyops by introducing ideas into mainstream consciousness. It is notorious for this. It constantly prefigures future scenarios. It is an integral part of their control system. Cue Stanley Kubrick.......

People certainly saw the big rockets take off from Earth, and millions saw the returning capsules land in the ocean. But this start and finish, and everything in between, was only shown to us all on TV, by the corporate media and BBC . The only part of the story that was actually witnessed live by ordinary people was the launch from Earth. The return landings were in the middle of the ocean miles from all civilians. And all the rest was from inside the capsule in space, or on the moon, so obviously no witnesses there!

It was all "top secret" and "national security". The same old stale bullshit excuse that they always use. So it was all on a "need to know" basis. A hoax could in fact have been pulled off with a very small number of insiders. How do we really know that the astronauts ever left Earth orbit? In fact how do we really know that they ever left the Earth?

"Those pictures were taken on the moon"
"That film was taken on the moon"
"Those rocks came from the moon"
"They are from the moon because we said that they are"

We already know that the scientific establishment, and particularly the corporate media, lie to us all the time.

So why would we trust known liars when it comes to the moon landings story? Do you really think that they were more honest in 1960's? Really? I already told you that the CIA was founded in 1946.

In fact NASA has become so notorious for lying that it is often referred to as:

Never A Straight Answer


There are at least 2 other obvious questions that follow from all this:

How might they have done the fraud?
Why might they have done the fraud?


I already told you about the How. That would have been easy. The tv images that they broadcast were ultra low definition. I know that because I saw them "live" myself and they were very indistinct. Very. The available cameras in 1960's, both tv and others, were much higher definition than we actually saw on the "live" broadcasts. Rather than use a direct tv feed from the control centre, they actually filmed a tv set showing the "live" feed, to broadcast their images to us all, via our tv's! Thus ensuring ultra low def. No high def for the plebs, they might spot something.

NASA now says that it has "lost" the tapes of all of the "historic" video record too. Thousands of spools. So no way of doing any modern image analysis. How convenient!

The still photos were good old style lens and film. Leaving aside the effect of all that radiation on unexposed film, how did they actually take the photos? Well, the cameras were mounted on the chest of their moonsuits. They were high def and the resulting snaps are freely available to view at various websites.

But htf did the moon walking astronauts focus their cameras so well wearing those massive moon suit gloves? All the stills are in good focus ffs, all of them. And htf did the astronauts frame their photos so well from inside their space helmets? All of the photos are well framed. It makes no sense.....

As you would imagine then there has been lots of, independent, thorough analysis of these photos. And numerous anomalies have been revealed as a result. Like why did the lunar lander rocket engine not stir up all that lunar dust? The lander should surely have been covered in dust? Not even the feet of the lander have dust on them. There are lots of shadow anomalies too, indicating multiple light sources. You know, a bit like a film set........

If you are interested enough to want to know more then, this book is a good starting place. Well it is far more than that in truth. It is a thorough demolition job of the official story. It is a great read, and very funny in parts too:

http://www.whale.to/c/Dave%20McGowan%20-%20Wagging%20The%20Moon%20Doggie.pdf

The highly respected Dave McGowan sadly passed away recently. But his work is still out there for free.


As regards the Why then read Dave's theories about Vietnam in Part III of the above link. He gives as good an explanation as I've read anywhere else. It was a distraction from lots of other nasty stuff that was happening at the same time. Same old, same old then.......


In conclusion.......

The fact that you saw a grainy black and white image on a tv in the middle of the night doesn't make the story true.

The fact that the mainstream media was unanimous in its promotion of the story doesn't make the story true.

The fact that nobody in the media properly questioned any of the numerous scientific anomalies doesn't make the story true.

The fact that those in academia, and elsewhere, who did properly question these anomalies, did not get any airtime, anywhere, doesn't make the story true.

In fact the media, and academic, unanimity in the moon landings story reminds me of 9/11. The same absolute adherence to a ridiculous story is evident.

The 9/11 hoax was so ridiculous that it stunned many people into looking at our "history", as taught to us all in our state schools, in a much more inquisitive way. The media curtain was ripped away, and the little men behind it were revealed to have no clothes.

Many of their numerous lies have been revealed, and continue to be revealed. And there is no way to un-reveal them, short of 100% control of the internet, and social media.

And that is surely impossible. We are not dumb enough to allow that to happen are we?

Addendum 2nd April 2019

https://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing-a-giant-hoax-for-mankind/


Addendum 13th July 2020

Proof that the moon landings were fake in a few easy steps

First look at this link:

https://www.universetoday.com/20489/moon-compared-to-earth/ 

Quote:

"Let’s take a look at the diameter first. The diameter of the Moon is 3,474 km. Now, let’s compare this to the Earth. The diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km. This means that the Moon is approximately 27% the size of the Earth.

What about surface area? The surface area of the Moon is 37.9 million square kilometers. That sounds like a lot, but it’s actually smaller than the continent of Asia, which is only 44.4 million square km. The surface area of the whole Earth is 510 million square km, so the area of the Moon compared to Earth is only 7.4%."

So the Moon is 13 times bigger than the Earth measured by surface area, which is what we see [100%/7.4%=13.5]

Now look at these famous images from Apollo 8:

https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk00d58UDIWhMC6T3_mC3NSxURKA0CA%3A1594641808632&source=hp&ei=kE0MX8yQJIO1gwfblq2QBQ&q=moonrise+apollo+8&oq=moonrise+apoll&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQARgAMgIIADIGCAAQFhAeMggIABAWEAoQHjIGCAAQFhAeOgcIIxDqAhAnOgcILhDqAhAnOgQIIxAnOgQILhAnOgsILhCxAxDHARCjAjoICAAQsQMQgwE6BQgAELEDOggILhCxAxCDAToFCC4QsQM6DgguELEDEMcBEKMCEIMBOgIILjoICC4QsQMQkwI6CAguEMcBEK8BOgQIABAKUKoUWLxYYJh5aAJwAHgAgAFkiAGmCZIBBDE0LjGYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6sAEK&sclient=psy-ab 

See a problem?

Why doesn't the Earth look massive from the moon?

It should look 13 times bigger than the Moon does from the Earth because the surface area is 13 times more

So the famous 1968 Apollo 8 "Moonrise" photo is a fake then

[It's not as if there is only 1 Moonrise photo either, there are lots of them as you can see. They say that men landed there 6 times]

Why would it be fake if they had really been there and done that 6 times?

QED

But don't tell anyone about this, they will think that you are a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist 

ps

In the 1960's NASA owned and ran a massive film studio at Lookout Mountain Laboratory, the intelligence community’s top-secret, state-of-the-art film studio nestled high in the Hollywood Hills. Overlooking Universal Studios in fact 

Why would they need to do that? See above for the answer to that 

This is why NASA is now known as

Never

A

Straight

Answer

Never mind Trump, he is a sideshow

The dark agenda behind globalism and open borders

With a postscript and some stings in the tail

The link below is to an interesting post from an astute alt-right blogger in the US, Brandon Smith.

Brandon predicted both the Brexit and Trump victories months in advance. I link his post today, about his Brexit and Trump predictions, at the end of my text:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3045-the-dark-agenda-behind-globalism-and-open-borders

Brandon hits some key points in his post, which I will summarise here:

First, the globalist new world order will be private and will totally dominate and subvert all governments. The global central banksters are private banks, not government owned or run. Their corporations are private businesses. These banksters and corporations already dominate all governments to a major degree. That must surely be obvious even to the dumbest of us. Banksters and Company Directors are private and they never, ever, go to jail do they. Even when they defraud us out of billions £/$. The globalists relentless push for privatisation is already well advanced.

Second, the globalist new world order will not be voluntary. The people will not have a choice. The people will not decide whether to retain the nation state or not. There will be no meaningful voting to decide who forms the world government. [Just like the EU, only 10 times more remote] Ordinary people will have no say whatsoever. Not that they have much of a say now.

Third, the elimination of national, and personal, sovereignty is essential for the globalists to succeed. To quote Brandon:
"....globalism is an outright war waged against the ideal of sovereign peoples and nations. It is a guerrilla war, or fourth generation warfare, waged by a small group of elites against the rest of us."

I am no great fan of the nation state, but it is one of the few protections that we have got against the globalists. That and our personal sovereignty under the Common, or Natural, Law. If the globalists get their way then both will cease to exist. Nations will be subsumed into regional superstates like the EU. Personal sovereignty will be subsumed into legalisms like "Human Rights". "Human Rights" that are given to us from on high and that can therefore just as easily be removed from on high. In fact our rights as human beings are now inherently ours under the Common Law. They cannot be removed by any government, or bankster, or corporation.

If you think that the insidious surveillance state is over powerful now then just wait for the next stage. You ain't seen nothing yet. This process of destruction of our sovereignty is already well advanced in truth. And we were never asked if that is what we wanted were we?

Fourth, open borders are a key part of the strategy to eliminate the nation state. And this means that, if they succeed in opening all the borders then, cultural diversity will eventually be eliminated, not celebrated. Obvious if you give it some thought. The globalists intend to destroy the nation state and destroy personal sovereignty and the people won't have any choice. Just like the German people were given no choice about their recent imposed mass immigration. Imposed on them by the EU fascists with the complicity of Frau Merkin.

Fifth, the fact that the globalists have planned their moves decades, generations, in advance. Humanity has been like lambs to the slaughter, literally so in the 20thC. The psychopathic globalists manipulated most, if not all, of the key 20thC events to suit their agenda. That manipulation has increased exponentially in the 21stC. All without a care for the tens, no hundreds, of millions of ordinary people who perished. Psychopaths for sure.

They are building a mental prison for us all aided by their lying, falsifying academia and media, both mainstream and alt. If we are not very careful then, soon there will be no way out.

Brandon suggests that we can fight back by pushing for:
* decentralisation
* volunteerism
* localism
* self reliance
* free participation or non-participation. ie. freedom from forced association

I would add:
* a return to classical education methods. Trivium and Quadrivium. Teach critical thinking
* government by the people, for the people. Kick out the psychos
* agricultural self sufficiency. The EU globalists have destroyed that here in the UK. But it can be rebuilt if we make the effort

The globalist central banks have created a financial Armageddon for the near future. There is no doubt that their policies have created this impending financial catastrophe. They cannot possibly "kick the can down the road" for much longer. That is clear to anyone who understands the way things are going just now.  It looks like they are going to blame it all on their opponents, and then use the chaos to try to convert their globalism into a corporatist world government. That means a fascist world government. A private world government.

They plan to cause such chaos that people will easily accede to their "solution" of even more centralisation under their control. The globalists have openly stated that they plan to have a world currency in place by the end of this decade.

Dangerous times are ahead folks. It will probably take decades, perhaps generations, before they fully seal the exits. They must be resisted at every step along the way.

Brandon Smith has an impressive archive which you can access at his site. Here are some extracts from the link:

"It has been well known and documented for decades that the push for globalism is a deliberate and focused effort on the part of a select “elite;” international financiers, central bankers, political leaders and the numerous members of exclusive think tanks. They often openly admit their goals for total globalization in their own publications, perhaps believing that the uneducated commoners would never read them anyway. Carroll Quigley, mentor to Bill Clinton and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is often quoted with open admissions to the general scheme:

“The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland; a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank… sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.” - Carroll Quigley, Tragedy And Hope"

and

"This mentality is evident in the systems that they build and exploit. For example, central banking in general is nothing more than a mechanism for driving nations into debt, currency devaluation, and ultimately, enslavement through widespread economic extortion. The end game for central banks is, I believe, the triggering of historic financial crisis, which can then be used by the elites as leverage to promote complete global centralization as the only viable solution.

This process of destabilizing economies and societies is not directed by the heads of the various central banks.  Instead, it is directed by even more central global institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements, as outlined in revealing mainstream articles like Ruling The World Of Money published by Harpers Magazine."

and

"I could quote globalists all day long, but I think you get the general idea. While some people see globalism as a “natural offshoot” of free markets or the inevitable outcome of economic progress, the reality is that the simplest explanation (given the evidence at hand) is that globalism is an outright war waged against the ideal of sovereign peoples and nations. It is a guerrilla war, or fourth generation warfare, waged by a small group of elites against the rest of us."

I recommend reading the whole of his post:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3045-the-dark-agenda-behind-globalism-and-open-borders



Here is Brandon's post today about Trumps "victory". You don't think that the UK and US are democracies do you? How quaint. Read this and you might realise that they ain't:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3055-trump-will-be-president-how-alt-market-predicted-the-outcome-five-months-in-advance


Postscript

Two obvious questions that arise from all this are:

1. Who exactly are these globalists?
2. How do they exercise their control?

Obviously the answers to these 2 questions are not something that they broadcast in their corporate media! But this site is a good starting point for researchers:

http://theglobalelite.org/globalists/

The globalists use a number of private "think tanks" and "committees" that will be familiar to most truth seekers. These are some of the key supra-governmental bodies that they use:

The Committee of 300
Bilderberg Group
Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]
Trilateral Commission

There is a brief overview of each of these important organisations in the above link.

There is also a flow diagram towards the end of the above link that shows the big picture for the whole of Anglo-American Zionist elite. You will find many familiar names, and some not so familiar.

I suspect that this site does not show the correct emphasis of the overt, and hidden, power relationships. For instance the CIA is a small box at the bottom left. I expect that it should have a more central, and larger, position. And wtf is Israel? So there is probably some significant misdirection going on. Let's face it, there usually is. But most of the key players will be in there I expect.

I view the site as a possible starting point, like I said. Not as the definitive statement. That doesn't exist anywhere as far as I know. If anyone knows different I will be grateful if they post a link in the comments.


The stings in the tail

Finally there are obviously some key global players that are missing from the above. The minor matters of the Russians, the Chinese, the Germans, and others.

Many observers think [hope?] that the Russians and the Chinese are some sort of anti-globalist bulwarks. I don't.

I think that they are both essentially within the globalist elites orbit. Also that both are now playing a key role in the move to a world government.

The Russians are back in their familiar "bogeyman" role. Familiar to those that remember the Cold War anyhow. It was bullshit then, and it's bullshit now. The Russians have never ever invaded Western Europe. It has always been the other way round.

And surely nobody thinks that Vlad Putin came from out of nowhere to lead Russia by accident? Come on! The world doesn't work that way. He must have been sponsored by powerful forces. But who were they? He has as dodgy a bio as Barry Obomber. I smell globalists/elites of some description.

What about China? Well, for starters, the globalists groomed and facilitated Mao. He was a Yale man. Skull and effin' Bones. Their man. The globalists also aided and facilitated Deng to generate their capitalist communism after Mao. They gave him some essential lessons in the legal person fiction. The big legalism con that I have blogged about before. It was an essential component of globalist capitalism in China. It did not exist in China before the globalists got to Deng. It was absent from the previous ancient Chinese legal code. It was an essential precondition for the globalist elites move into China. Do you really think that the globalists would move all their factories into a godless, commie, country and risk any loss of control? Don't be silly.

So the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their globalist pals were in bed with the Chinese "communists" from the get go. Just like they were with the Russian "communists" earlier. This is all documented, just not in the mainstream.

There is absolutely no contradiction here - the globalists don't give a damn about nations. Or ordinary people. Or political systems. They will back fascists, rightists, centrists, socialists or communists, as suits their purpose. They use the left more than the right, for various practical reasons, certainly not for any ideology. Think George Soros that arch globalist, finance capitalist, so called left leaning do-gooder, but really fascist multi-billionaire, scumbag. If you've been fooled by that cnut then you really are stuck in the Matrix.

They are truly international finance capitalists. They are without loyalty to anyone but themselves and their own kind.

The Chinese now want to see a world currency. China is already participating in the embryonic world currency, the SDR [Single Drawing Rights]. China joined in October this year with virtual silence in the mainstream corporate media too. Why this silence? Same old same old I guess. The Chinese are certainly a key component of the globalist strategy.

See this link for plenty of info on the SDR:

https://www.corbettreport.com/?s=sdr

Order out of chaos is the tried and tested globalist technique that they have used time and again. Just ask the Russians and Germans, who bore the brunt in Europe in the 20thC.

And order out of chaos is exactly how the globalists kick started their EU project. It was actually conceived by the globalist German elites prior to WW2. They called it the "Europaische Wirtschaftsgemainschaft" which translates as the "European Economic Community"!

Old timers will instantly realise that this is the exact same name that was used by the globalists after the war to develop their fledgling superstate which subsequently became the EU. Order out of chaos for sure.

Time will soon tell if I am correct about China and Russia. I hope that I'm wrong tbh. It would be good to think that some section of the worlds elites are on our side, on the peoples side. But I'm not holding my breath. All the previous history points in the other direction.

How the US election exposes the "Shadow Government"

Wikileaks and the US deep state


The current US election cycle is the craziest yet. It confirms many of the so called "Conspiracy Theories" about the realities of modern political power. And straight from the horses mouth too.

If you are interested in the way the system really works then watch this:

https://jaysanalysis.com/2016/11/03/bombshell-top-clinton-wikileaks-exposes-entire-shadow-government-jay-dyer-vid/


More here too:

Hillary’s ‘Russian Hack’ Hoax: The Biggest Lie of This Election Season

http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/11/01/hillarys-russian-hack-hoax-the-biggest-lie-of-this-election-season/