Both want big government at the expense of our liberty and freedom.
Both put corporations at the heart of their system.
Both are tools of the globalists.
Wake up leftists!
Wake up rightists!
You are both being played by the globalists........
Here are some key extracts from a recent piece by one of my favourite Reality bloggers, Brandon Smith of alt-market. My further extensive comments follow the quotes. The link to the quotes is at the end:
"If you want to be able to predict geopolitical and economic trends with any accuracy, you must first accept a couple of hard realities. First and foremost, the majority of cultural shifts and fiscal developments within our system are a product of social engineering by an organized collective of power elites. Second, you must understand that this collective is driven by the ideology of globalism — the pursuit of total centralization of financial and political control into the hands of a select few deemed as "superior" concertmasters or "maestros." As globalist insider, CFR member and mentor to Bill Clinton, Carroll Quigley, openly admitted in his book Tragedy And Hope:
and
"The philosophical basis for the globalist ideology is most clearly summarized in the principles of something called "Fabian Socialism," a system founded in 1884 which promotes the subversive and deliberate manipulation of the masses towards total centralization, collectivism and population control through eugenics. Fabian Socialists prefer to carry out their strategies over a span of decades, turning a population against itself slowly, rather than trying to force changes to a system immediately and outright. Their symbol is a coat of arms depicting a wolf in sheep's clothing, or in some cases a turtle (slow and steady wins the race?) with the words "When I strike I strike hard."
Again, it is important to acknowledge that these people are NOT unified by loyalty to any one nation, culture, political party, mainstream religion or ethnic background. In fact, they will happily sacrifice any country or any group of people if it will get them closer to their goal.
They are not defenders of the free market as the idiots on the extreme left like to claim. In fact, they abhor any business model that is not dominated by a government and a bureaucracy designed to give them an unfair advantage through legislation. Anyone who thinks free markets are the cause of our economic ailments in the past decade has lost sight of the fact that we have not had anything even remotely resembling free markets for more than a century. The corporations leftists and common socialists constantly wail about could not exist without government charter and the legal loopholes surrounding limited liability. So please, socialist warriors, shut up about free markets. You have no idea what you are talking about."and
"This assertion falls apart fantastically when historical fact is applied and one realizes that BOTH communism and fascism were movements funded and supported by the very same financial elites. Yes, that's right, fascism cannot be opposed to globalism, because globalists created fascism to serve their purposes.
To find the most comprehensive evidence compiled on the relationship between the financial elites and the rise of fascism and communism, one of the best sources is the work of Professor Antony Sutton. Here Sutton answers questions on some of these ties, including the elitist funding and technological development of the Nazis as well as the Soviet Union:""
and
"So, to be absolutely clear - Fascist movements are NOT a counterweight to communism, they are controlled opposition to communism. If you want to join a real opposing movement to cultural marxists and communists, then the only answer is a movement that supports individual liberty and the reduction of government power. Fascism does not support either.
Beyond general cash flow and technological backing for fascist governments, the globalist ideology is almost identical to fascist models. Mainstream assumptions aside, fascists are not true nationalists, rather, they are ideologues seeking to spread globally — their propaganda base just happens to begin with national pride. As mentioned earlier, globalism is best understood through the lens of Fabian Socialism, and Fabian Socialism is essentially fascism; though fascism tends to add a frontman dictator as a figurehead rather than an open cabal of oligarchs.
Fabian Socialists (globalists) are so fond of fascism that they have in the past presented unabashed defense of the Third Reich. George Bernard Shaw, a celebrity member of the Fabians, is notorious for praising the methods of both the Nazis and Stalin, including the mass murder of undesirables.
The difference between the communist model and the Nazi model? Nazis believed in population control based on genetic origin, while communists believed in population control based on labor potential. Both standards appeal to globalists.
Bottom line — fascists are slaves for globalists, just as communists are slaves for globalists. Both support big government power, both undermine personal freedoms. There is little more than cosmetic differences between them when one knows the true history behind each movement."
Brandons piece is a salutary warning to those, mainly young, idealists who have jumped on the Jeremy Corbyn bandwagon here in the UK. Corbyn leads a party that has always been controlled by Fabian Socialists, those wolves in sheep's clothing. Every Labour Prime Minister has been a Fabian, every single one of them.
And as Brandon says then, the Fabians are globalists and so they are cloaked fascists in reality. Because all globalists, even the ones that call themselves socialists, are inherently fascists. They want big government, preferably big regional government like the EU, and ultimately world government. World government will mean global centralisation of financial, corporate and political control into the the elites hands.
All these extra layers of government are, and will be, regressive. They will certainly further facilitate the domination of their monopolistic global corporations. Democracy in such circumstances will become even more meaningless. And ordinary people will be even more divorced from our rulers than they are now.
As Brandon says the left is utterly blind to the reality of monopoly capitalism. The monopoly capitalists have effectively controlled all western governments for several decades at least, probably far longer. Their corporations could not be monopolistic otherwise. Then there are all those government tax receipts that are sucked into their corporations by the extensive ongoing privatisation of service provision. Not to mention the massive "black" budgets.
The layers of government that the leftists foolishly love are a key part of the globalists control structure. They control all government. Anyone who tells you different is living in cloud cuckoo land.
What do you think that the global institutions, the EU, ECB, UN, IMF, World Bank etc etc are all about? They pretend that they care about ordinary people with their talk of Human Rights etc, but that is deception. They are all controlled by globalists in practice.
For example see my blog about the UN from last year. The links there demonstrate in great detail how the UN legitimised the pillaging of Libya by the usual suspects in the West. It is an utterly nauseating tale that resulted in tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of innocent Libyans deaths:
The main problem that the young idealists have is that they have not studied history properly. They have relied on the dumbed down history provided by the, fully globalist controlled, State indoctrination system usually known as "Education". And also the history provided by the, fully globalist controlled, so called "free", media usually known as "The Mainstream Media".
So they have no idea that the globalist elites fully control both political parties in the US & UK and that they have done for ages.
The Fabians were formed in 1884 and the Labour Party was formed shortly after, in 1900, and it has always been chock full of Fabians. Every Labour Prime Minister has been a Fabian. Despite its officially "working class" origins, it is now very obvious that the Labour Party is a form of controlled opposition. It probably always has been in truth.
It is very obvious because Labour never addresses humanity's key problems:
Corbyn [and his Labour Party] don't want you to be free.
They support the current money creation system.
They support the current banking system.
They support the current legal system.
They support the current corporate system.
They kowtow to, and thus support, the military industrial entertainment complex.
They kowtow to, and thus support, the Monarchy.
For confirmation of these last 2 then see my earlier blog:
https://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/jeremys-new-world-order.html
They kowtow to, and thus support, the Monarchy.
For confirmation of these last 2 then see my earlier blog:
https://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/jeremys-new-world-order.html
They support the big government that the globalists use to monopolise everything.
This is the same for all UK politicians, of all parties. These are all things that they rarely, if ever, debate. Because they all support this status quo in practice. They never rock these boats. They've no choice. They have to support all this, for example, if they are going to get any media coverage. Without media coverage they might as well not exist. The oligarchs media of course. They are bound by groupthink. They can never really dissent on these fundamentals.
Now just think for a minute about what all that means in practice for the rest of humanity.....
It means that Corbyn and Labour support all the things that enslave us all; all the things that are also enslaving, often murdering, all free people across the world; all the things that are destroying the planets ecosystem too. I could go on and on but I'll spare you that. It's not what they say that counts but what they do. Their historical record is very clear.
So Corbyn is a globalist lackey [all politicians are] and so he accepts the de facto rule by oligarchs who have ruled Britain since the 1600's at least [see below]. The Queen is head of State but she is also one of the oligarchs, their Doge if you like, the ceremonial head oligarch, the first among equals.
The oligarchs rule of the whole planet is the end game for the globalists. The oligarchs call it the New World Order. Make no mistake, if it ever happens it will be fascist through and through.
[Witness the ongoing creeping militarisation of our police forces. Our police forces who are, theoretically, public servants! Their so called "terrorist" events are the excuse but they are usually false flags. Scratch the surface and this becomes apparent very quickly. I think that one of the main purposes of all their "events" is to normalise cops with machine guns on the streets of our cities. And it is working. Martial law is creeping up on us and nobody seems to care]
In fact the British State has been fully controlled by oligarchs since 1688, the so called Glorious Revolution, when democratic "reform" and the Bill of Rights [oligarchs privileges] was implemented as far as the official history goes. This is a con of course, official history often is. A cursory study of the Glorious Revolution will point to the lie. William of Orange was "invited" to take the Crown by the British oligarchs in 1688.
The Bank of England was formed in 1694, only 5 years later.
The Bank of England was the worlds first ever Central Bank.
Need I say more?
Of course I will........
1600 the oligarchs formed the East India Company.
To control and plunder the East.
1642 to 1651 the oligarchs had their English Civil War.
To soften up England for their coming "Glorious Revolution" and to reintroduce their iniquitous usury, among other things too complex to go into here.
"All wars are bankers [oligarchs] wars" remember.
1670 the oligarchs formed the Hudson's Bay Company.
To control and plunder the New World [America].
1688 the oligarchs took full control of the British State.
The Glorious Revolution. Glorious for the oligarchs certainly, hardly glorious for humanity.
1694 the oligarchs took full control of British State finances.
The privately owned [oligarch owned] Bank of England.
Here is the East India Company flag. Remind you of anything?
.svg)
Are you starting to get the picture?
Come on, wake up and smell the coffee.....
In closing I hasten to add, for any young idealists who might read this, that I was once a young idealist too. I did not study history properly either. I only did that when I "retired" when I was 60, in 2010. So I am not critical of your idealism, or your failure to study history. I understand.
But, for YOU to understand then YOU need to study real history, not the fully controlled official history.
You could start by reading Brandon's article carefully [see link below] and following it up with your own research.
You could use the internet while it is relatively free ahead of the coming clampdown. You could use it to study real modern history before the globalists fully control the internet too. Better hurry folks..........
You could turn off your tv, or at least never watch the news. It is amazingly liberating I can tell you....
Pigs might fly........
Finally, here is a quote from Orwell's 1984:
“He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”
The link to Brandon's article here:
ps1
I think that the real role of William of Orange in the Glorious Revolution is a delicious irony. The Orangemen of Ulster call him King Billy and they venerate him. If only they knew........
But the plebs of Ulster clearly do not understand King Billy's true role. If they did then they would surely shut the fuck up about him.
Realistically the senior Grandmasters and the other head honchos in their Lodges must know. Masons have often been at the heart of the many conspiracies against the plebs over recent centuries after all, they still are in fact. The most senior Masons are English oligarchs of course.
For example, Masons led the American revolution in 1776. All the key figures were Masons. So Masons wrote the US constitution, the Bill of Rights etc etc.
The layout and architecture of Washington DC itself is Masonic.
The dollar bill is also Masonic, see this:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_one_dollar_bill,_reverse,_series_2009.jpg
Just look at that pyramid and the words underneath.
The words underneath the pyramid are in Latin:
NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM
In English:
New Order of the Ages, or
New World Order.
It's in Americans faces!
All of this is a bit of a clue who was, and still is, really in charge over in the US wouldn't you say.
That East India Company flag is another.
It's the oligarchs stupid!
ps2
If you dig even deeper then you will find that the British oligarchs who invited William of Orange to take the Crown had already been thoroughly infiltrated by the Black Nobility of Venice. Of course it was the Venetians who first created rule by oligarchs in Europe. The Doge of Venice was the first among equals too. The first Doge was in 697 AD the last in 1797. As Venice declined then the very rich oligarch families moved into Europe looking for a new land to rule. They settled in London eventually, via Germany and Holland, where they were instrumental in the creation of the British Empire. Rather than a city surrounded by water they now had a whole country surrounded by water. Their sea power has always been crucial. Rule Britannia, Senior Service et al
The City of London, which is not part of the UK, is one of their key strongholds. Washington DC, which is not part of the USA, is another.
Her Majesty the Queen, the "British" oligarchs Doge is not the senior figure in the City. When in the City our Queen is subservient to the Lord Mayor who is senior to her. She defers to him when in the City. This is easily verifiable and it is very revealing.
Otherwise of course I have gone deep into Conspiracy Theory territory with this last addition. This is information that is not readily available to us plebs. If you are interested then you can find a good starting point for further research here:
http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/
Further, Benjamin Disraeli's 1844 novel, Coningsby, explains the Venetian origins of the British ruling oligarchy, now masquerading as a monarchy. [The link to "Coningsby" at Project Guttenberg under "External Links" at the bottom of the page lets you read the book online]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coningsby_(novel)
Addendum 9th October 2017
Some profound musings on oligarchy and democracy:
http://yourdailyshakespeare.com/democracy-tortured-meaning-of-the-wrong-word/equalities#more-8263
