"The entire world is far far far right"
Italics and underline are my emphasis:
"I am not a fascist, I am an
anti-fascist. I say that in almost every paper and it is obvious even when I don't. I also call myself an
old-school liberal: by which I mean I am against unbridled predation by the wealthy upon the lower
and middle classes. I critique Modernism all the time, as you know, but that doesn't mean I have or
want any alliances with the right, the Republican party, or cloaked fascists by any other name. I also
don't want any alliances with the Democratic party, since it is just another front for the same fascists—
as we will see again below......................................
Regardless of who he is related to, Michael Dean Huttner is well worth exposing as a fraud. He also
founded ProgressNow, which is closely tied to MoveOn. Both promoted Obama, remember. As part of
that, Huttner wrote the book 50 Ways You Can Help Obama Change America. That really worked out
well, didn't it? Obama turned out to be so progressive and such a breath of fresh air, right?
Let me pause on that word “progressive”. These fake traditionalists like the Germ try to redefine
“progressive”, just like they have redefined “liberal”. They tell you it has something to do with crazy
feminists, fake social justice warriors (which were manufactured by the right, by the way), over-the-top
gay promotion, and so on. But neither progressive nor liberal mean anything like that. I am against
crazy Modern stuff, as you know, but I still call myself a liberal. That is because I still use the old preCIA
definition of liberal, which has to do with protecting normal people from the very rich—whether
those very rich people are nobles or financiers. Here is the first paragraph at Wiki on “liberalism”:
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.
[1][2][3] Liberals espouse
a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and
programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights,
democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality, and international cooperation.
I agree with all of that, which is why I am a liberal. Originally, equality meant “equal under the law”.
It has to do with equal rights. It doesn't imply everyone has equal abilities, or should be given equal
consideration on every issue—even issues they know nothing about. It implies that normal people
shouldn't be lied to and preyed upon by rich people, and that therefore normal people should be treated
with equal consideration in matters of law, education, finance, health, and so on. That is, public
matters, not private matters. It is simply a fairness doctrine. Same with gender equality. It didn't
originally mean that the sexes should be indistinguishable. It meant that one sex shouldn't be able to
prey on the other one in any arena. It meant that women should be equal under the law. That's what all
the other issues are about as well, including freedom of speech, freedom of the press, unions and so on.
Without those things, it is too easy for the rich to monopolize society, raking everything into their
corner.
However, as I have shown you, the rich have found a way around all that. One way they have found a
way around it is by twisting the passage above, making you think liberalism is something it is not.
People like Alex Jones, Mike Adams, the Germ, and thousands of others have been drumming into your
head the idea that the collapse of Modern society is the fault of liberals, and of the idea of liberalism.
They want you to think that all the worst aspects of our culture came from the promotion of liberalism.
But just the opposite is true. As we have seen in my papers of the past five years or so, real liberals
didn't create any of these movements—including Modern art, what now passes for feminism, gender
chaos, or any of the rest. They were all top-down projects of Intel, usually coming out of the military,
and financed by the big capitalists—most of them Jewish. I didn't know that a few years ago, and
honestly didn't want to know it, but there it is. I am honest enough to admit the truth when it hits me in
the face. I did my own research from the ground up, and that research took me to the same culprits
every time.
This means that liberalism has been blackwashed on purpose. It has been blackwashed just like
republicanism was before it, and for the same reason. Both liberalism and republicanism are antifascist.
They promote the rights of the lower and middle classes not to be preyed on by the rich. But,
as we have seen, the rich have been infiltating and blackwashing republicanism for centuries. That is
what Marxism was all about. Marx was from Jewish industrialist families, and he was nothing more
than a mole into the republican camps, blowing them from the inside. It is the same with liberalism,
which has been blown both from the outside and from the inside, via the long telling of fantastic lies by
thousands of paid agents.
Another way the rich have undercut liberalism is by allowing things like free speech and freedom of
the press, while gutting them of all real meaning. In theory, we have freedom of the press in the US,
since the military is not actively shutting down major media at gunpoint. In reality, the press is not free
at all, since it is completely owned by the rich. That is the neo-fascist answer to the press: not to
forcibly control it, but to financially control it. In our society, the media is managed, which makes it
utterly useless as a tool of liberalism.
Beyond that, an owned and managed media can be used to flip the world on you, making you think
things exist at A when they really exist at Z. They have convinced you the US is suffering from
liberalism, and that therefore we need to move right. When the truth is, the US isn't liberal at all, by the
definition above. The country is tightly controlled from the top down, your freedoms are illusory, and
all the events you see in the news are manufactured to keep you from the truth. Which means—by the
old real definitions of words—we need to move sharp left. Basically, “right” means the rich control
everything and have all the advantages; “left” means normal people have an equal chance for
advancement and can expect to be treated fairly. The entire world is far far far right."
The above quotes caught my eye. As usual Miles makes you think. He exposes the false modern left/right paradigm: "The entire world is far far far right". Of course it is.
To my mind the left used to be so inclusive, it was all about the common people v the capitalists, as Miles says. But the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School, and their disciples, have a lot to answer for. The left has become so angry and divisive now, with its misguided focus on identity and victimhood. Society is thus splintered into mutually exclusive identities. Which was the elites plan all along it seems, divide and conquor.
The Cultural Marxists have been incredibly successful in manipulating the culture of the West. In the UK they have been aided and abetted by the Fabians of the Labour Party of course, those elitist wolves in sheep's clothing. As Miles says "....blown both from the outside and from the inside....".
The Fabians acted without any public political statement of intent, they admit that they never declared their intentions in public. That is, they never declared themselves openly in the political process. For obvious reasons, they would have been utterly rejected if they had.
See my earlier blogpost, (Specifically, Occult Yorkshire 8):
https://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/fabians-wealth-and-cultural-engineering.html
To quote:
"Fabian prophecies that a welfare state, followed by an intense focus on internationalism, would be the mechanism elevating corporate society over political society and a necessary precursor to utopia. Fabian theory is the Das Kapital of financial capitalism"
This is exactly what has happened of course.
"Corporate over political" is simply Fascism without jackboots, Neo-fascism in other words.
Here is the full paper:
http://mileswmathis.com/hutt.pdf
And talking of jackboots, if you take the links on page 2 to his previous papers about the Nazi's, then you will go deep down the rabbit hole. Sod it, here they are:
Beer Hall Putsch:
http://mileswmathis.com/putsch.pdf
His photo and text analysis clearly points to one of the 20th centuries biggest deceptions.
Hitler's Genealogy:
http://mileswmathis.com/hiller.pdf
The family histories shown demonstrate that all the leading Nazis were not what you thought they were. They were all actors, just like most politicians are.
Oh the deceptive webs that the rich controllers weave.......
