It is easy to spot the fake on the photo below:
* Clear line of demarcation at the back of the troops
* Clear lines of demarcation at the sides of the troops where the trees blend
* Spectators at the side smaller than the troops
* Different exposure to the arch and the troops
It is clearly a composite of 2 or more photos.
FILE–Thousands of American soldiers march along the Champs Elysees, on Aug. 29, 1944, four days after the liberation of Paris, France. World War II began in September 1939, with Adolph Hitler’s invasion of Poland. Germany surrendered on May 7, 1945. (AP Photo/Peter J. Carroll)
So why would AP need to fake the liberation of Paris?If it was real as sold to us then, why fake it?
If they chose to fake this momentous event then, what else did they fake?
Why would you believe anything that they put in their mainsteam media?
Source:
https://pieceofmindful.com/2016/08/28/parisians-fail-to-turn-out-for-1944-liberation/
When you read the link then also read the comments. The first comment by Tyrone McCloskey is very interesting. The first piece was written in 2016 and these thoughts of Tyrones have been further developed since. See this from early last year:
https://pieceofmindful.com/2017/01/26/the-hitler-project-pasewalk-idyll/
Even more here from the rabbit hole maestro, Miles Mathis. On the following link he demonstrates even more fake photos. Of Chamberlain, Hitler and Mussolini, at Munich before WW2!!
Why would they need to fake these photos if the Munich agreement was real? Did they not have official photographers in 1938? Of course they did:
http://mileswmathis.com/hitler2.pdf
The links to his previous pieces in the penultimate paragraph, on page 5, take you way down into the burrows.
Finally, all these thoughts have been incorporated into a wide ranging perspective here:
http://fakeologist.com/fakeopedia/index.php/NaZionism
This is a very, very controversial topic, not least the holocaust element.
If you took the red pill and have therefore got an open mind then, you should have a good look. There is plenty of food for thought there that's for sure. We already know that vast chunks of the official history of the 20thC are false, so nothing should be ruled out, and nothing ruled in.
If you took the blue pill then - baaaaaaa, go back to the sheep.
When you read the link then also read the comments. The first comment by Tyrone McCloskey is very interesting. The first piece was written in 2016 and these thoughts of Tyrones have been further developed since. See this from early last year:
https://pieceofmindful.com/2017/01/26/the-hitler-project-pasewalk-idyll/
Even more here from the rabbit hole maestro, Miles Mathis. On the following link he demonstrates even more fake photos. Of Chamberlain, Hitler and Mussolini, at Munich before WW2!!
Why would they need to fake these photos if the Munich agreement was real? Did they not have official photographers in 1938? Of course they did:
http://mileswmathis.com/hitler2.pdf
The links to his previous pieces in the penultimate paragraph, on page 5, take you way down into the burrows.
Finally, all these thoughts have been incorporated into a wide ranging perspective here:
http://fakeologist.com/fakeopedia/index.php/NaZionism
This is a very, very controversial topic, not least the holocaust element.
If you took the red pill and have therefore got an open mind then, you should have a good look. There is plenty of food for thought there that's for sure. We already know that vast chunks of the official history of the 20thC are false, so nothing should be ruled out, and nothing ruled in.
If you took the blue pill then - baaaaaaa, go back to the sheep.
