Wednesday 9 November 2016

Never mind Trump, he is a sideshow

The dark agenda behind globalism and open borders

With a postscript and some stings in the tail

The link below is to an interesting post from an astute alt-right blogger in the US, Brandon Smith.

Brandon predicted both the Brexit and Trump victories months in advance. I link his post today, about his Brexit and Trump predictions, at the end of my text:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3045-the-dark-agenda-behind-globalism-and-open-borders
Brandon hits some key points in his post, which I will summarise here:

First, the globalist new world order will be private and will totally dominate and subvert all governments. The global central banksters are private banks, not government owned or run. Their corporations are private businesses. These banksters and corporations already dominate all governments to a major degree. That must surely be obvious even to the dumbest of us. Banksters and Company Directors are private and they never, ever, go to jail do they. Even when they defraud us out of billions £/$. The globalists relentless push for privatisation is already well advanced.

Second, the globalist new world order will not be voluntary. The people will not have a choice. The people will not decide whether to retain the nation state or not. There will be no meaningful voting to decide who forms the world government. [Just like the EU, only 10 times more remote] Ordinary people will have no say whatsoever. Not that they have much of a say now.

Third, the elimination of national, and personal, sovereignty is essential for the globalists to succeed. To quote Brandon:
"....globalism is an outright war waged against the ideal of sovereign peoples and nations. It is a guerrilla war, or fourth generation warfare, waged by a small group of elites against the rest of us."
I am no great fan of the nation state, but it is one of the few protections that we have got against the globalists. That and our personal sovereignty under the Common, or Natural, Law. If the globalists get their way then both will cease to exist. Nations will be subsumed into regional superstates like the EU. Personal sovereignty will be subsumed into legalisms like "Human Rights". "Human Rights" that are given to us from on high and that can therefore just as easily be removed from on high. In fact our rights as human beings are now inherently ours under the Common Law. They cannot be removed by any government, or bankster, or corporation.

If you think that the insidious surveillance state is over powerful now then just wait for the next stage. You ain't seen nothing yet. This process of destruction of our sovereignty is already well advanced in truth. And we were never asked if that is what we wanted were we?

Fourth, open borders are a key part of the strategy to eliminate the nation state. And this means that, if they succeed in opening all the borders then, cultural diversity will eventually be eliminated, not celebrated. Obvious if you give it some thought. The globalists intend to destroy the nation state and destroy personal sovereignty and the people won't have any choice. Just like the German people were given no choice about their recent imposed mass immigration. Imposed on them by the EU fascists with the complicity of Frau Merkin.

Fifth, the fact that the globalists have planned their moves decades, generations, in advance. Humanity has been like lambs to the slaughter, literally so in the 20thC. The psychopathic globalists manipulated most, if not all, of the key 20thC events to suit their agenda. That manipulation has increased exponentially in the 21stC. All without a care for the tens, no hundreds, of millions of ordinary people who perished. Psychopaths for sure.

They are building a mental prison for us all aided by their lying, falsifying academia and media, both mainstream and alt. If we are not very careful then, soon there will be no way out.

Brandon suggests that we can fight back by pushing for:
* decentralisation
* volunteerism
* localism
* self reliance
* free participation or non-participation. ie. freedom from forced association

I would add:
* a return to classical education methods. Trivium and Quadrivium. Teach critical thinking
* government by the people, for the people. Kick out the psychos
* agricultural self sufficiency. The EU globalists have destroyed that here in the UK. But it can be rebuilt if we make the effort
The globalist central banks have created a financial Armageddon for the near future. There is no doubt that their policies have created this impending financial catastrophe. They cannot possibly "kick the can down the road" for much longer. That is clear to anyone who understands the way things are going just now.  It looks like they are going to blame it all on their opponents, and then use the chaos to try to convert their globalism into a corporatist world government. That means a fascist world government. A private world government.

They plan to cause such chaos that people will easily accede to their "solution" of even more centralisation under their control. The globalists have openly stated that they plan to have a world currency in place by the end of this decade.

Dangerous times are ahead folks. It will probably take decades, perhaps generations, before they fully seal the exits. They must be resisted at every step along the way.

Brandon Smith has an impressive archive which you can access at his site. Here are some extracts from the link:

"It has been well known and documented for decades that the push for globalism is a deliberate and focused effort on the part of a select “elite;” international financiers, central bankers, political leaders and the numerous members of exclusive think tanks. They often openly admit their goals for total globalization in their own publications, perhaps believing that the uneducated commoners would never read them anyway. Carroll Quigley, mentor to Bill Clinton and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is often quoted with open admissions to the general scheme:
“The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland; a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank… sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.” - Carroll Quigley, Tragedy And Hope"
and
"This mentality is evident in the systems that they build and exploit. For example, central banking in general is nothing more than a mechanism for driving nations into debt, currency devaluation, and ultimately, enslavement through widespread economic extortion. The end game for central banks is, I believe, the triggering of historic financial crisis, which can then be used by the elites as leverage to promote complete global centralization as the only viable solution.
This process of destabilizing economies and societies is not directed by the heads of the various central banks.  Instead, it is directed by even more central global institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements, as outlined in revealing mainstream articles like Ruling The World Of Money published by Harpers Magazine."
and
"I could quote globalists all day long, but I think you get the general idea. While some people see globalism as a “natural offshoot” of free markets or the inevitable outcome of economic progress, the reality is that the simplest explanation (given the evidence at hand) is that globalism is an outright war waged against the ideal of sovereign peoples and nations. It is a guerrilla war, or fourth generation warfare, waged by a small group of elites against the rest of us."
I recommend reading the whole of his post:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3045-the-dark-agenda-behind-globalism-and-open-borders



Here is Brandon's post today about Trumps "victory". You don't think that the UK and US are democracies do you? How quaint. Read this and you might realise that they ain't:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3055-trump-will-be-president-how-alt-market-predicted-the-outcome-five-months-in-advance


Postscript

Two obvious questions that arise from all this are:

1. Who exactly are these globalists?
2. How do they exercise their control?

Obviously the answers to these 2 questions are not something that they broadcast in their corporate media! But this site is a good starting point for researchers:

http://theglobalelite.org/globalists/

The globalists use a number of private "think tanks" and "committees" that will be familiar to most truth seekers. These are some of the key supra-governmental bodies that they use:

The Committee of 300
Bilderberg Group
Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]
Trilateral Commission

There is a brief overview of each of these important organisations in the above link.

There is also a flow diagram towards the end of the above link that shows the big picture for the whole of Anglo-American Zionist elite. You will find many familiar names, and some not so familiar.

I suspect that this site does not show the correct emphasis of the overt, and hidden, power relationships. For instance the CIA is a small box at the bottom left. I expect that it should have a more central, and larger, position. And wtf is Israel? So there is probably some significant misdirection going on. Let's face it, there usually is. But most of the key players will be in there I expect.

I view the site as a possible starting point, like I said. Not as the definitive statement. That doesn't exist anywhere as far as I know. If anyone knows different I will be grateful if they post a link in the comments.


The stings in the tail

Finally there are obviously some key global players that are missing from the above. The minor matters of the Russians, the Chinese, the Germans, and others.

Many observers think [hope?] that the Russians and the Chinese are some sort of anti-globalist bulwarks. I don't.

I think that they are both essentially within the globalist elites orbit. Also that both are now playing a key role in the move to a world government.

The Russians are back in their familiar "bogeyman" role. Familiar to those that remember the Cold War anyhow. It was bullshit then, and it's bullshit now. The Russians have never ever invaded Western Europe. It has always been the other way round.

And surely nobody thinks that Vlad Putin came from out of nowhere to lead Russia by accident? Come on! The world doesn't work that way. He must have been sponsored by powerful forces. But who were they? He has as dodgy a bio as Barry Obomber. I smell globalists/elites of some description.

What about China? Well, for starters, the globalists groomed and facilitated Mao. He was a Yale man. Skull and effin' Bones. Their man. The globalists also aided and facilitated Deng to generate their capitalist communism after Mao. They gave him some essential lessons in the legal person fiction. The big legalism con that I have blogged about before. It was an essential component of globalist capitalism in China. It did not exist in China before the globalists got to Deng. It was absent from the previous ancient Chinese legal code. It was an essential precondition for the globalist elites move into China. Do you really think that the globalists would move all their factories into a godless, commie, country and risk any loss of control? Don't be silly.

So the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their globalist pals were in bed with the Chinese "communists" from the get go. Just like they were with the Russian "communists" earlier. This is all documented, just not in the mainstream.

There is absolutely no contradiction here - the globalists don't give a damn about nations. Or ordinary people. Or political systems. They will back fascists, rightists, centrists, socialists or communists, as suits their purpose. They use the left more than the right, for various practical reasons, certainly not for any ideology. Think George Soros that arch globalist, finance capitalist, so called left leaning do-gooder, but really fascist multi-billionaire, scumbag. If you've been fooled by that cnut then you really are stuck in the Matrix.

They are truly international finance capitalists. They are without loyalty to anyone but themselves and their own kind.

The Chinese now want to see a world currency. China is already participating in the embryonic world currency, the SDR [Single Drawing Rights]. China joined in October this year with virtual silence in the mainstream corporate media too. Why this silence? Same old same old I guess. The Chinese are certainly a key component of the globalist strategy.

See this link for plenty of info on the SDR:

https://www.corbettreport.com/?s=sdr

Order out of chaos is the tried and tested globalist technique that they have used time and again. Just ask the Russians and Germans, who bore the brunt in Europe in the 20thC.

And order out of chaos is exactly how the globalists kick started their EU project. It was actually conceived by the globalist German elites prior to WW2. They called it the "Europaische Wirtschaftsgemainschaft" which translates as the "European Economic Community"!

Old timers will instantly realise that this is the exact same name that was used by the globalists after the war to develop their fledgling superstate which subsequently became the EU. Order out of chaos for sure.

Time will soon tell if I am correct about China and Russia. I hope that I'm wrong tbh. It would be good to think that some section of the worlds elites are on our side, on the peoples side. But I'm not holding my breath. All the previous history points in the other direction.



No comments:

Post a Comment