How money rules

Why the world is as it is - And how it can be changed

This post will need no explanation for anyone who is half awake. It is the most succinct summary of humanity's key problem that I have ever read, anywhere.

My brief comments at the end.

"The World is run by the Banking Cartel, who is the real hegemon, not some Nation State.

When Banks rule, it is obvious that they rule through money. Here is how they do it.

How we know the Banks rule

Let us first ascertain that the Banking Cartel is indeed the hegemon. And this can be proven by one simple statistic: the World is indebted to them to the tune of $247 Trillion Dollars. That is three times World GDP.

This debt costs about $12 Trillion per year to service, which is about one sixth of World GDP. It is known that all this money ends up with the richest 10% of the people worldwide. Even much worse: about a third of this money (about 4 Trillion) ends up with the richest 0,0032%. These are the people that control the Banks.

Compare this to the income of the US Federal Government, which sits at a paltry $3 Trillion. US Government debt to the Bank is about $21 Trillion, and US total debt (including households and corporations) is perhaps as high as $70 Trillion.

Not only is the Government’s income markedly lower than that of the Banking Cartel, it is dependent on them for money.

These numbers are self evident. They expose the true nature of power, and they also show how ridiculous it is to speak of ‘economic growth’ and ‘wealthy countries’. Obviously, the United States cannot be ‘rich’ when it has $70 Trillion (3,5 times GDP) in debt. There will be wealthy people in the US, yes, but the country itself is poor and broke, as is also proven by the fact that 80% of Americans own nothing, and live paycheck to paycheck.

Besides the obvious implications of the massive debt, it has been established that all the major Banks in the World (European, American, Chinese, Japanese) own each other. They ARE a cartel. It’s not speculation, it’s a fact.

Controlling the Money Supply

To control means to be able to start, sustain, and stop something. Banks control the money supply. They create the money, they decide how much money there is, who gets it, and they destroy the money (when debts are repaid).

And they control all the money supplies in the World. Including that of Syria and Iran. And North Korea. Which is not surprising, as the Communist Manifesto demands ´the centralization of all credit in the State, by means of a national bank and an exclusive monopoly’.

Libya seems to have been the last country with monetary independence: Gaddafi ran an interest-free monetary system, with the issueing organization securely in his own hands. People got interest-free loans for business ventures and mortgages. When the ‘rebels’ (Zio-Capitalist-Wahhab proxy goons) were still a bunch of start ups in Benghazi, the first thing ‘they’ (in reality their sponsors in the State Department) produced was a charter for a Central Bank.

All ‘national’ currencies worldwide, are created in the same way: as an interest-bearing debt to the Bank. Which is noteworthy in itself, because there are many natural ways of creating currency, and this uniformity is a key tell-tale sign of centralized control.

It is sometimes hard to fathom for people why money is so incredibly crucial in the economy, but it’s really very simple: money is half of all transactions. The seller provides goods and services, the buyer provides money.

So on the one hand, there are all the goods and services in the World, on the other hand, there is the money.

Money is the gateway to everything else. Without money, most transactions would not take place. By controlling the volume of money, one controls price levels in the economy. By keeping money scarce, one creates artificial scarcity of everything.

By controlling money, one controls the entire economy.

How they translate control of money into control of everything

Here are the three main Banker tools of exploiting control of money:
1) Usury, which is interest on loans of money.
2) Creating inflations and deflations, the boom and bust cycle.
3) Credit allocation: Bankers decide who gets money, and who doesn’t. They control who can invest, and in what.

We have already seen what damage Usury does: working people pay $12 Trillion per year to the idle classes, parasites who inherit billions and suck up billions more in interest, without ever producing anything that is of use to anybody.

Usury is the main driver of debt. The last 25 years or so, States, Corporations and individuals have paid more interest than they currently have debts outstanding. Without Usury, there would hardly be any debt.

By controlling the volume of money, both in the general economy, and in specific markets, they control all price levels. Yes, ALL price levels, in all markets. Even Oil (the biggest market) they can just increase prices tenfold in a matter of moments. They did this in 2006-2008. This is true of all assets and commodities.

By lending liberally, for instance for speculation on the Stock Exchange, or real estate, they create booms, inflations causing higher prices. Next, they cite ‘lack of confidence’, or ‘bad fundamentals’, and stop lending, which diminishes money in the market, and lowers prices, leading to busts.

During the busts, most people are forced into liquidation at depressed prices. Only the Plutocrats have enough money to pick up the pieces for pennies on the dollar.

The 2008 Credit Crunch alone has created about $50 Trillion in damages worldwide (bailouts plus missed economic growth). Unsurprisingly, the wealthy became much wealthier in the last ten years, while working people (the 90/99%) saw income and asset positions decline massively in real terms.

And last, but not least, the Banker privilege of deciding who gets credit: the implication of this is obvious: the absolute worst people in the World get to decide who gets money, who can invest, and in what. Therefore, Bankers decide in what direction society will develop. So obviously we have mass poverty, people working 50 hours per week, 50 weeks per year while having nothing. That is how the filthy rich like it.

When Bankers decide who gets money, then the Fed can just print $16 Trillion for Bank bailouts, while politicians will tell everybody we can’t afford food stamps and social security.

Conclusion

Yes, the Bankers rule, and they rule through money. They prey on our ignorance. We don’t understand they are a Cartel (a Monopoly), we don’t understand how they create the money, how they set all prices, how Usury automatically concentrates all wealth with the very richest.

But once one does understand the problem, the solution is obvious: take control of the money supply, create usury-free credit, manage volume to allow stable prices (which is really not complicated), and allow local communities to allocate credit for their own needs.

Note that the problem is not fixed with some Gold Standard, while they own all the Gold, and will only lend it at interest to us. The problem is also not fixed with letting the State create the money, but leave all credit (at interest!) to Banking. Crypto currencies are bogus items who do not solve any of our monetary problems. Mindless speculation is not going to solve Banking.

Nationalizing the Fed is also far from sufficient, and at best a minute step in the right direction. The Fed only exists to facilitate Commercial and Merchant Banking, and was created by the Banking Industry.

Keep this in mind: the essence of Banking is not ‘money creation’ as most of the Alternative Media will tell you. The quintessential nature of Banking is lending at interest. THAT is what a Bank does, and that is how they have conquered the entire World.

Only interest-free credit can solve Banking and the New World Order."

This explains why there is an endless need for "growth" that is taken as read by all political and government Establishments, everywhere across the planet. Each of us has been brainwashed by this mantra. It is repeated over and over and over again, by their "experts", ad infinitum. So it must be truth hey?

Well, NO.

In truth we humans do not need endless "growth", we just need stability and security. We need food and shelter and security but we have nothing to gain by this "growth" of theirs. But we've all been brainwashed into thinking that we have.

The truth is that, if we want to grow then, we need to create our own, personal, growth.

But to feed the banksters Usury machine then every economy, everywhere, must "grow". This is their dogma, and it feeds their machine, but it is not in OUR interest [see what I did there?]

Only our rulers and their henchmen, and women, gain by this system. This has always been true. It was once admitted by them via their media mouthpiece the Times of London............

In the 19th century, when Abe Lincoln issued "Greenbacks" to fund the US civil war, they were issued by his government, free of interest. The Banksters, who were all from Europe then, wanted to charge the US 30% interest for their loans! But they were denied their usual skim by old Abe.

Here is what the Times had to say about Abe's policy:

"If this mischievous financial policy, which has it's origins in North America, becomes entrenched then, the Government will issue its own money without cost. It will pay off all its debts and be without debt. It will become prosperous to a degree which is without precedent in the history of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will migrate to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

Do think that this may have had something to do with Abe's assassination? Seems pretty obvious to me.

Kings and Queens used to rule.

We are told that politicians, parliaments and courts now rule, by our consent.

But that is a bare faced lie. It's the Banksters stupid............

You may think:

What can I do?
How can I do anything to change this massive worldwide problem?
I'm one small voice among 7 billion; I can't change a thing.

Wrong!

Human consciousness is the key. The more people that understand the problem then, the more chance there is of change. We plebs outnumber the rulers massively. What scares them most is our consciousness. That's why they put so much effort into controlling individuals and society.

Their methods are sophisticated and effective.They want to distract us from these simple truths. They always want to distract us. Radio, TV, Hollywood, Gaming, Professional sports, Gambling, Social media etc etc etc. Anything to "entertain" us and to stop us thinking about the important issues. And they make profits at the same time. It is win win for them.

They certainly know that our consciousness will be unstoppable if it reaches critical mass. A big IF I know

So tell and explain. To as many people as you are able.

The other things that you can do are simple as well:

For a start, do not give them your money. Reduce your spending within their system. Increase your spending outside their system. Local is good, global is their game.

So withdraw from their system as much as you can; in any way that you can.

Make a start at least. Rome wasn't built in a day. Then keep doing whatever you can.

Take your savings out of the bank and put them in a mutual building society.
[Mutual means owned by the members, not the banksters. If you save with a mutual then you automatically become a member. There are several big mutuals based in Yorkshire. Canny folk in "god's own" ;-) ]

Buy more things with cash. Use your credit card less. They want to eliminate cash because they can't control, or tax, a cash economy.

Don't watch TV. At least watch less. And never watch the "news", ever, it is pure unadulterated propaganda which bears little relationship to the real world. Nothing that you ever see on TV is real, nothing, ever. This is obvious if you think about it: images on a screen are not real. The teLIEvision changes your brain state. It sedates you. That's what they want. Your unthinking compliance. Don't give it to them.

Quit Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc etc, all social media. Or at least use it far more sparingly, in a controlled and limited way. Avoid the usual addiction by using your self control. Because the more time that you spend in cyberspace then, the less time you are in the real world. All social media is controlled by the banksters, via their spooks. You didn't think that Zuckerbung actually created Facef**k did you? Don't be silly it was always the spooks, from the get go. They admit that now.

And you didn't think that the spooks actually report to politicians did you? How quaint. Of course they don't, they report to the owners; they work for the owners, the trillionaires, not the people, or society.

Just like the politicians do, all of them. One thing is for sure, nothing will change if all that you do is vote. Voting changes nothing fundamental. The puppets may change but the owners who sit in the shadows never change. The same families have been running the show for many generations, hundreds, even thousands of years.

How do I know this about politicians?

It is quite simple:

Either the politicians know what is the true cause of inequality ie.Usury
Or they don't

If they do then, why do they never tell the voter?
If they don't then, they are ignorant and just useful idiots for the hegemon
I'm not sure which is worse......
Of course I do, most of them know I expect

Anyway, it is clear that social media is the spies wet dream. You voluntarily give up to them ALL of the information about you. They hoover up this mass of info, all of everything electronic, and then use it to control society, and you. Algorithms do the work for them. They don't need to coerce anyone, its all done voluntarily. Like everything else nowadays you do all the work using their software

It's all very clever, but you do not HAVE to help them.

And I've said nothing yet about their lawyers, their academics, their medical people, their pharmaceuticals........

And nothing yet about you growing your own food, supporting your local community, volunteering to help others, giving directly to the needy..........

Source:

https://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/how-money-rules/

More here:

The degrading facts of a fake money hole in the head

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-01/degrading-facts-fake-money-hole-head

What is time?

With some thoughts on GOD, Religion and Atheists

Time does not exist in Nature.

It is an artificial construct to control hu-mans [both male and female].

Don't believe me? Then read this by Clint:

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2017/12/14/the-four-pillars-of-fiction-part-1-a-matter-of-time/

It will take you lots of time, but you should not care about that.

Because time is a complex subject that most hu-mans don't fully understand.

And because time is an artificial construct that is used to control you.

The information herein is more valuable to you than any time ever will be.

Clint knows what he is talking about.

Read him carefully, understand his words and think for yourself.

You've got the time because you can choose to ignore time if you so please.

I have quoted 7 samples of Clint's wisdom below.

Please do not be put off by his references to God. God is not what you think it is either, as you will see if you read Quotes 5, 6 & 7 below. Read these quotes carefully and think about the meanings of Clint's words. My brief thoughts about GOD, Religion and Atheists are after all the quotes.

Quote 1

"As I progress further into the deeper realms of comprehension surrounding this strange fictional world built upon nothing but the legal matrix code of word magic, as if finally starting to see only the figurative, insubstantial code that makes up The Matrix as a legal (artificial) simulation in all its digital design and functionality, I wanted to share perhaps the singular element of this fictional construct that must falsely exist as a necessary foundation to support that whole maddening, artificial world. For behind the curtain of the wizard we do not find any controls or magic artifacts to govern the planet and its inhabitants. Instead, we find merely a Roman calendar dating from zero into infinitum — from the beginning (zero point) of this artful, legal creation story of a time-released world of nothingness to an as of yet empty, future timeline without end"

Quote 2

"Literally, there is and can be no end to economic growth. It’s a cancerous tumor, and what is a cancer without fulfillment of its eternal purpose (pointless growth). All governments are corporations (artificial persons), and there is only ever two directions — either growth or insolvency — in the fictional “corporate world.” A corporation cannot exist without showing growth in its artificially contracted timeline. Growth and expansion is a corporation’s very purpose, in order to fulfill the greed of its stock and shareholders. It can be no other way in mammon, until eventually this purposefully cancerous growth must destroy not only its host but its epoch of purpose. "

Quote 3 [Clint is speaking as a US citizen]

"Yes, we are indeed placed upon the Roman calendar in the legal (artificial) realm, under the Roman (strict), positive legal law. We celebrate the olympics every four years. And we even go to Romanesque colosseums to watch sports and cheer on their organized violence and blood-shed. The only difference is that now we give thumbs up or down through our computers and cellphones like a hive-minded collective of nitwits as we watch such events on the boob-tube. We are, for all intents and purposes, doing as the Romans did before their empire was shattered by its own moral bankruptcy. And in the ultimate irony, we have even abandoned our republics (States) for central federalism and democracy, just like then. And worst of all, we worship free-masonic constitutions as our false idols, as god-like law-givers written by the most unscrupulous of slave-holding men."

Quote 4

"In Nature, all things are timeless. Immortal. Eternal.  This merely means that spiritually nothing in Nature has a beginning or an end, for to begin and end requires a recorded timeline of events. In this way, the immortal man of God, immortal and eternal due to the passing of blood and thus Life itself in procreation of posterity, is turned instead into a mortal (time-based) legal entity that begins and ends as the recorded history of the legal realm. We are plucked from God’s Creation and placed into man’s fictional simulation of It. We thus become the victims of the artifice of time.

That which is mort-gaged (a dead pledge) is that which is placed under a contract of debt based on time. What is placed into the register of the time domain is always dead. All persons, places, and things (nouns/names) of the legal system, of Rome, are dead.

History, in other words, is always the story of the dead, even when its characters are still Living in the Real. The fiction of history is never the Reality of Life. And the life of a fictional person (strawman) can only be accounted for by the event and consideration of its birth-day on the Roman calendar, the calendar of the legal system. There is no age in Nature, only True Life.

Under God’s Law of Nature, it is not so much that men own the land, it is that the land owns the man. There are no parts, only the Oneness of all Creation. Man, in other words, is to be wed to the land in respect and in husbandry"

Quote 5

"We must at all times strive to belong only to God. We should never, therefore, seek to be hu-man in our True Being. In other words, all of our thoughts and actions should be in Love and protection of what is the Supreme Being (all things Real and True without fiction), the Supremacy of all Being, which is defined as Jehovah (God). I remind the reader again that the Word Jehovah is a verb, and thus so is the word Being. God (as Jehovah) is not defined in the Bible an external “being” from Nature, but is all of Existence, Truth, Reality, and thus Nature (the Uni-verse) Itself as the Oneness of this continuous and TIMELESS Being (verb) we are a part of. Existence is a state of Being, and man’s Existence (Being) therein should be in harmony with the Nature of Jehovah and so obviously beholden to Its self-evident Law and Laws of Nature.

I urge the reader once again to dispel any notion of this being religion. Religion is what is built up around the Bible and other Holy Books to steer one away from the  knowledge and Law within, to cause this externalization of God from Nature (Creation) as well as our own place within. This is the two realms of Law, one of the Real, of Nature, and one of the artifice, of fiction. One is of God (Jehovah), and one is of that which is adversarial to God. One cannot be known or understood without the other, as the light which illuminates the dark.

JEHOVAH – noun – The Scripture name of the Supreme Being. If, as is supposed, this name is from the Hebrew SUBSTANTIVE VERB, the word denotes the Permanent Being, as the primary sense of the SUBSTANTIVE VERB in all languages, is to be fixed, to stand, to remain or abide. This is a name peculiarly appropriate to the eternal Spirit, THE UNCHANGEABLE GOD, who describes himself thus, I am that I am. Exodus 3:14. (–Webster’s 1828)

God is a verb…

To those with eyes to see and ears to hear, you will find this to be the most spiritually beautiful understanding of your entire Life. And suddenly, without the images and false idols of the works of art and fiction of the church and its anti-Biblelical false-doctrines of religion, you will find that the entirety of the Bible can now be understood in its True intention. Of course, all such words must be deciphered from the evil intentions of that revisionist king of England. For what is a story of Law if the words have been altered into the dog-Latin idiocracy of the common language of English?"

Quote 6

"In this way, the Author of the Law of Nature must be considered as foundational, sound, and secure, even unbreakable, so that Its Law as well is to be respected as unbreakable. This is purely reasonable in every way, for without such a foundation all things must reasonably fail. If this be the case, then we must not confuse man’s creation of organized (corporate) religion, which is continuously changing with every papal Bull or other amendment to its corporate charter and articles of incorporation, with the Truth of what we call as the Law of Jehovah (Nature). The Bible is a Book of Law, and is to be followed religiously. Religion and its denominations are not verbs (actions) but a nouns (empty, flattering titles), and requires no law to be followed, only the blind faith and pledge of its members to the corporate structure of that religion and its false doctrines. While the Bible is and promotes only what is self-Evident Truth, religion steals Truth away and replaces it with nonsense and trickery in support of the time-based history and legal system of the law of man that incorporated each religion into its purely legal, fictional existence as a corporation (artificial person in law). Even the Vatican is a legal person (corporation)."

Quote 7

"Science. The Roman Catholic Church is a positive (manmade) legal entity, a corporate persona that practices legal (anti-God) law. It is not of God’s Nature nor does it practice in any way the Law of God’s Nature. It is the creator of the modernly used, almost universal civil law calendar. It is the instigator of this time-based society and the A. D. timeline we are so accustomed to, though it has nothing to do with Jesus Christ. For the pope is a pretender, a vicar (replacement) Christ on earth, standing legally, vicariously in the stead of (anti-) the Biblical Christ in corporate personhood."

So plenty for the religious believers and the atheists to ponder in Quotes 5, 6 & 7 for sure. He clearly points to the irrelevance of both Religion and Atheism.

Because GOD is a VERB, not a noun.

GOD is simply all of Being [verb], everything that there is, not some Creator [noun] or Weirdy Beardy Man [noun] in the sky. The distinction between verb and noun is crucial.

Also because all religions are legal fictions, they are all Corporations and so they are fictions in fact. They all have the express purpose of diverting you from what is true. I suppose that the atheists might run with that aspect of what Clint says. The key word here is fiction. ie. made up by humans, not REAL, does not exist in Nature.


These simple statements are of course based on the true meaning of words. Clint's work demonstrates just how much real meaning has been distorted and hidden by the controllers.

They also remind me of Miles Mathis's regular advice, which is along the lines of the following:

The controllers always offer up at least 2 explanations for something important to them. First the mainstream version. Second the conspiracy theory, the alternative, version[s]. The truth, for these issues that are important to them anyway, is usually neither of these, it is usually elsewhere. The agenda is usually fully controlled - by them.

We've seen this time and again in Miles's papers. And perhaps also in many of the numerous false events that they present to us as real.


Clint also explains how the Religious God is NOT the GOD of the bible.

So the Religious God v Atheism is a false dialectic. Because religion does not represent GOD. Debating God with a religious believer is a complete waste of time [as anyone who has ever talked with a Jehovah's Witness will know].

The GOD of the bible is a VERB [Being] not a NOUN [Creator].

So atheism is irrelevant too. Atheists cannot credibly deny that the universe, and everything in it, actually EXISTS, can they? Surely not!

Ha ha ha ha ha.......... that is hilarious if you think about it......


There is far far more in the whole piece. It is an intense read but it is well worth the effort.

Clint's work certainly highlights the fictional nature of our individual Persona [Strawman] and the fictional nature of all Corporations [Companies].

Persons [Strawmen] and Corporations[Companies] are ALL Legal Fictions.

This is foundational knowledge. It is essential to understand this because without understanding it then, you can never understand the Legal [fictional] world that dominates us all.

Clint's book "Strawman" is over 1,000 pages long and it covers all this in detail. It is available on his website as a free download.

Finally, Clint did not write "Strawman" for mere money, he wrote it to spread this foundational knowledge. I was one of his sponsors when he took the time out to write the book.

I gave him some of my mere money. I understood then, a year or more ago, that his work is essential knowledge. I do not pretend to understand it comprehensively. It is a work in progress for me too.

https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2017/12/14/the-four-pillars-of-fiction-part-1-a-matter-of-time/

ps.

Clint's website is a treasure trove for those who care to look. For instance he also fully exposes the financial fraud [CAFR] that all governments play on us. The CAFR is the "Comprehensive Annual Financial Report". All Western Governments use this to tell us about their "Budget". But they never show us their "Balance Sheet", which is where most of their vast financial wealth is hidden. This aspect  of Clint's work is only fully understandable by those who are financially literate. In other words most of humanity will not understand it.

Btw, all Governments are Corporations [Companies] too of course, all of them. So they are all Legal Fictions too. This applies to Local Governments [Councils in the UK] and National Governments. All are Corporations hence all are Legal Fictions.

[In UK Local Governments often used to be called the Corporation but this was changed to Council at some stage]

The Crown here in the UK is a Corporation too. A Corporation Sole according to Wiki. Still a Corporation though. And so still a Legal Fiction.

Ever feel like you've been had? I know that I did when I found out about all this a few years ago. Nobody ever learns this at school do they? They never tell anyone about this. Why do you think that might be? That fact tells you most of what you need to know about modern "Education".

Progressives, Liberals and Fascists

"The entire world is far far far right"

Italics and underline are my emphasis:

"I am not a fascist, I am an anti-fascist. I say that in almost every paper and it is obvious even when I don't. I also call myself an old-school liberal: by which I mean I am against unbridled predation by the wealthy upon the lower and middle classes. I critique Modernism all the time, as you know, but that doesn't mean I have or want any alliances with the right, the Republican party, or cloaked fascists by any other name. I also don't want any alliances with the Democratic party, since it is just another front for the same fascists— as we will see again below......................................

Regardless of who he is related to, Michael Dean Huttner is well worth exposing as a fraud. He also founded ProgressNow, which is closely tied to MoveOn. Both promoted Obama, remember. As part of that, Huttner wrote the book 50 Ways You Can Help Obama Change America. That really worked out well, didn't it? Obama turned out to be so progressive and such a breath of fresh air, right?

Let me pause on that word “progressive”. These fake traditionalists like the Germ try to redefine “progressive”, just like they have redefined “liberal”. They tell you it has something to do with crazy feminists, fake social justice warriors (which were manufactured by the right, by the way), over-the-top gay promotion, and so on. But neither progressive nor liberal mean anything like that. I am against crazy Modern stuff, as you know, but I still call myself a liberal. That is because I still use the old preCIA definition of liberal, which has to do with protecting normal people from the very rich—whether those very rich people are nobles or financiers. Here is the first paragraph at Wiki on “liberalism”:

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. [1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality, and international cooperation.

I agree with all of that, which is why I am a liberal. Originally, equality meant “equal under the law”. It has to do with equal rights. It doesn't imply everyone has equal abilities, or should be given equal consideration on every issue—even issues they know nothing about. It implies that normal people shouldn't be lied to and preyed upon by rich people, and that therefore normal people should be treated with equal consideration in matters of law, education, finance, health, and so on. That is, public matters, not private matters. It is simply a fairness doctrine. Same with gender equality. It didn't originally mean that the sexes should be indistinguishable. It meant that one sex shouldn't be able to prey on the other one in any arena. It meant that women should be equal under the law. That's what all the other issues are about as well, including freedom of speech, freedom of the press, unions and so on. Without those things, it is too easy for the rich to monopolize society, raking everything into their corner.

However, as I have shown you, the rich have found a way around all that. One way they have found a way around it is by twisting the passage above, making you think liberalism is something it is not. People like Alex Jones, Mike Adams, the Germ, and thousands of others have been drumming into your head the idea that the collapse of Modern society is the fault of liberals, and of the idea of liberalism. They want you to think that all the worst aspects of our culture came from the promotion of liberalism. But just the opposite is true. As we have seen in my papers of the past five years or so, real liberals didn't create any of these movements—including Modern art, what now passes for feminism, gender chaos, or any of the rest. They were all top-down projects of Intel, usually coming out of the military, and financed by the big capitalists—most of them Jewish. I didn't know that a few years ago, and honestly didn't want to know it, but there it is. I am honest enough to admit the truth when it hits me in the face. I did my own research from the ground up, and that research took me to the same culprits every time.

This means that liberalism has been blackwashed on purpose. It has been blackwashed just like republicanism was before it, and for the same reason. Both liberalism and republicanism are antifascist. They promote the rights of the lower and middle classes not to be preyed on by the rich. But, as we have seen, the rich have been infiltating and blackwashing republicanism for centuries. That is what Marxism was all about. Marx was from Jewish industrialist families, and he was nothing more than a mole into the republican camps, blowing them from the inside. It is the same with liberalism, which has been blown both from the outside and from the inside, via the long telling of fantastic lies by thousands of paid agents.

Another way the rich have undercut liberalism is by allowing things like free speech and freedom of the press, while gutting them of all real meaning. In theory, we have freedom of the press in the US, since the military is not actively shutting down major media at gunpoint. In reality, the press is not free at all, since it is completely owned by the rich. That is the neo-fascist answer to the press: not to forcibly control it, but to financially control it. In our society, the media is managed, which makes it utterly useless as a tool of liberalism.

Beyond that, an owned and managed media can be used to flip the world on you, making you think things exist at A when they really exist at Z. They have convinced you the US is suffering from liberalism, and that therefore we need to move right. When the truth is, the US isn't liberal at all, by the definition above. The country is tightly controlled from the top down, your freedoms are illusory, and all the events you see in the news are manufactured to keep you from the truth. Which means—by the old real definitions of words—we need to move sharp left. Basically, “right” means the rich control everything and have all the advantages; “left” means normal people have an equal chance for advancement and can expect to be treated fairly. The entire world is far far far right."

The above quotes caught my eye. As usual Miles makes you think. He exposes the false modern left/right paradigm: "The entire world is far far far right". Of course it is.

To my mind the left used to be so inclusive, it was all about the common people v the capitalists, as Miles says. But the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School, and their disciples, have a lot to answer for. The left has become so angry and divisive now, with its misguided focus on identity and victimhood. Society is thus splintered into mutually exclusive identities. Which was the elites plan all along it seems, divide and conquor.

The Cultural Marxists have been incredibly successful in manipulating the culture of the West. In the UK they have been aided and abetted by the Fabians of the Labour Party of course, those elitist wolves in sheep's clothing. As Miles says "....blown both from the outside and from the inside....".

The Fabians acted without any public political statement of intent, they admit that they never declared their intentions in public. That is, they never declared themselves openly in the political process. For obvious reasons, they would have been utterly rejected if they had.

See my earlier blogpost, (Specifically, Occult Yorkshire 8):
https://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/fabians-wealth-and-cultural-engineering.html

To quote:

"Fabian prophecies that a welfare state, followed by an intense focus on internationalism, would be the mechanism elevating corporate society over political society and a necessary precursor to utopia. Fabian theory is the Das Kapital of financial capitalism"

This is exactly what has happened of course.

"Corporate over political" is simply Fascism without jackboots, Neo-fascism in other words.

Here is the full paper:
http://mileswmathis.com/hutt.pdf

And talking of jackboots, if you take the links on page 2 to his previous papers about the Nazi's, then you will go deep down the rabbit hole. Sod it, here they are:

Beer Hall Putsch:
http://mileswmathis.com/putsch.pdf
His photo and text analysis  clearly points to one of the 20th centuries biggest deceptions.

Hitler's Genealogy:
http://mileswmathis.com/hiller.pdf
The family histories shown demonstrate that all the leading Nazis were not what you thought they were. They were all actors, just like most politicians are.

Oh the deceptive webs that the rich controllers weave.......

Why use a fake photo?

WW2 - Liberation of Paris and on down the rabbit hole

It is easy to spot the fake on the photo below:
* Clear line of demarcation at the back of the troops
* Clear lines of demarcation at the sides of the troops where the trees blend
* Spectators at the side smaller than the troops
* Different exposure to the arch and the troops

It is clearly a composite of 2 or more photos.

FILE–Thousands of American soldiers march along the Champs Elysees, on Aug. 29, 1944, four days after the liberation of Paris, France. World War II began in September 1939, with Adolph Hitler’s invasion of Poland. Germany surrendered on May 7, 1945. (AP Photo/Peter J. Carroll)

So why would AP need to fake the liberation of Paris?

If it was real as sold to us then, why fake it?

If they chose to fake this momentous event then, what else did they fake?

Why would you believe anything that they put in their mainsteam media?

Source:

https://pieceofmindful.com/2016/08/28/parisians-fail-to-turn-out-for-1944-liberation/


When you read the link then also read the comments. The first comment by Tyrone McCloskey is very interesting. The first piece was written in 2016 and these thoughts of Tyrones have been further developed since. See this from early last year:
https://pieceofmindful.com/2017/01/26/the-hitler-project-pasewalk-idyll/


Even more here from the rabbit hole maestro, Miles Mathis. On the following link he demonstrates even more fake photos. Of Chamberlain, Hitler and Mussolini, at Munich before WW2!!

Why would they need to fake these photos if the Munich agreement was real? Did they not have official photographers in 1938? Of course they did:
http://mileswmathis.com/hitler2.pdf

The links to his previous pieces in the penultimate paragraph, on page 5, take you way down into the burrows.


Finally, all these thoughts have been incorporated into a wide ranging perspective here:
http://fakeologist.com/fakeopedia/index.php/NaZionism

This is a very, very controversial topic, not least the holocaust element.


If you took the red pill and have therefore got an open mind then, you should have a good look. There is plenty of food for thought there that's for sure. We already know that vast chunks of the official history of the 20thC are false, so nothing should be ruled out, and nothing ruled in.

If you took the blue pill then - baaaaaaa, go back to the sheep.