But most people don't realise that they are slaves.....
Read this from Anthony, my brief comments at the end:
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
A cliché, and yet so pertinent. So many people think that the struggle against the New World Order is about preventing becoming their slaves.
But we ARE their slaves!
The essence of Slavery is that someone else controls the value of our production.
Under Capitalism, people depending on a wage (the 90/99%), typically consume only about 10% of the value of their own production. The entire System is geared to sucking up our production with unearned income: Usury, Landlordism, Speculation, high prices of Monopoly.
In Capitalism, this was achieved by first driving the common people off their ancestral lands by systematically destroying the abundant money systems of the medieval era by forcing Gold Standards everywhere.
This caused a deflation that first savaged the country side.
In this way, the People lost their means of independence, and were forced to work for others for a living, in the cities. Instead of being independent farmers and craftsmen, they were demoted to wage slavery.
By giving him a wage, immediately a large chunk of the value of the worker’s production is taken by the shareholder. The value of the worker’s production is always much higher than his wage.
With Multinationals, profits and shareholder dividends are typically higher than cost for labor. Meaning that more than half of the workers’ production is taken by the owners of the company.
The reason that they get away with this, is because Capital is kept artificially scarce, both through Cartels and through the artificial scarcity of money. In this way, Labor is oppressed, forcing them into low wages and humiliating conditions.
The worker receives his wage, and the remaining value of his production is next sucked up with scientific precision.
A wage slave making $2000 per month has a budget something like this:
$300 for the State
$700 for the Landlord
$100 for Energy
$200 for ‘health’ ‘care’
$150 for Transportation
$50 for Telecom
Total: $1500
$300 for the State
$700 for the Landlord
$100 for Energy
$200 for ‘health’ ‘care’
$150 for Transportation
$50 for Telecom
Total: $1500
What remains, $500, about a quarter, is to eat and try live a life. A fraction of what 40 hours work produced, at least $4000 worth.
The beauty of the System is, that when wages rise, prices, debts (and associated usurious cost), rents, rise along, sucking up the extra purchasing power.
Residual wealth that the Middle Class retains during booms, is disowned a little later with the inevitably following crunch, forcing them into liquidation at depressed prices.
Free Markets, Right?! Supply and demand!
All good and dandy, we think. Fair enough. We use stuff, so we pay.
All good and dandy, we think. Fair enough. We use stuff, so we pay.
But when we take a closer look at where all this money ends up, it transpires that all supply chains we depend on (energy, automotive industry, telecom, ‘health’ ‘care’) are dominated by massive International Cartels.
Cartels keep supply low, and prices high, so a lot of their profits are unearned income, not really related to their production, but to their market power. They use this to keep competitors out, and the Capitalist’s core value is ‘Competition is Sin’ (John D. Rockefeller).
What is more, a great many people are enslaved by Landlordism, which is a vicious Tyranny, first established by the Sword, later overtaken by mortgages, the Money Power’s method of disowning the Landed Aristocracy. Landlordism is pure parasitism, and all the Land is owned by a really very small group of mostly very old families. For instance: all the homeowners in Britain combined own only 6% of the Land. All the rest is in the hands of a minute percentage of the population. Many of the main Land holders go back all the way to William the Conqueror.
Usury massively raises all these prices. As we know, Usury is about 40% of prices we pay for all goods and services: cost for capital passed on by the supplier.
This include the land we live on, and on which we are utterly dependent. In fact, Usury actually QUADRUPLES Landlordism´s rents.
But this is not the only way International Finance profits from everything: they also have a decisive stake in most of the Transnationals that dominate the supply chains we are completely dependent upon. Only 20% of Transnationals (there are about 40,000 of them) are independently owned.
Conclusion
In the past, people enslaved in the mines and the sweatshops, say late 19th century Britain, they were even forced by their employers to do their groceries in factory owned shops that charged outrageous prices.
In the past, people enslaved in the mines and the sweatshops, say late 19th century Britain, they were even forced by their employers to do their groceries in factory owned shops that charged outrageous prices.
We think we have outgrown this. It’s really time to think again: all that has happened is that Capital (Finance) has upped their game. Local shops on factory compounds are now international supermarket chains. But they are owned by the same people, and serve the exact same purpose: reclaiming Capital’s losses to wages, usurping our production.
People even go so far as to say ‘Capitalism has lifted people out of poverty’! What is so insane about this, is that a man, in 1694, worked about 15 weeks per year on his own farm. Then with the ascent of Capitalism, two centuries later, he worked 80 hours per week in some soul crushing ‘job’, and it was still not enough: his wife and his kids had to work too, just to pay for the rent and some potatoes.
Even today, we work at least twice as much as three centuries ago.
The most galling of it all is that people claim ‘freedom’, because once every four years they get to give away what remains of their power to some Kleptocrat insider with ‘democratic elections’.
This is the reality of Capitalism, which is centered around International Finance and its Usury (Banking).
No solution to all this is thinkable, without the end of Usury by interest free credit for the People."
How about you, do you realise how enslaved that you really are?
Source:
https://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2019/02/18/the-slavery-of-capitalism/
If you read the first few short comments at the end of the piece then, you will see some key related issues, relevant to all Brits and to all of humanity in fact. The largely unknown history, in the 1600's, of Oliver Cromwell, his Dutch/Jewish financiers, and the British landed gentry, is touched upon. I will briefly elaborate here.
The British aristocrats prior plunder of the Catholic churches wealth, followed by their control of the British Crown, via William of Orange, was used to set up their usurious Bank of England in 1694, only five years after William of Orange was crowned. William was actually chosen by the British oligarchs to be the king! There was no credible "succession" at all. They even admit that in Wikipedia, figuring that it is meaningless to most of their readers I guess.
It was an absolutely key period in British history. These fabulously wealthy, oligarchs and their Dutch based Jewish money men, followed by their descendants, have ruled over us ever since, make no mistake. They used/controlled the City of London and they went on to create the British Empire that plundered the rest of the world using the first international private corporations. Corporations like the British East India Company, which ran the sub-continent, ostensibly on behalf of the British State, but in reality on behalf of the private wealthy owners who actually owned the East India Company. It was a massive cash cow for the super rich of the time. In fact it was only disbanded in the 1800's by which time they effectively owned the British State lock stock and barrel.
The current oligarchs on-the-payroll historians of academia call the accession of William of Orange and the subsequent events "reforming" the Parliament, "the Glorious Revolution". It was glorious for the oligarchs certainly. Not so glorious for everybody else.
Their Bank of England was the worlds very first central bank of course. The "British" oligarchs owned it privately until 1946!! For 252 years!! They still control it today of course, even though they claim that it has been owned by the state since 1946. A claim that has never been properly proven of course because the public never sees the bank's audited accounts. They are only viewed privately, by insiders. So there is no real, demonstrable, democratic accountability at all. Wiki says "The Bank became an independent public organisation in 1998, wholly owned by the Treasury Solicitor on behalf of the government, but with independence in setting monetary policy." Yeah, sure.......
Pretty well very single country in the world now has a British [Rothschild] type of central bank. The worlds other key central bank is the Federal Reserve in the US. It is still privately owned, largely by the Rothschilds and their agents. China and Russia have Rothschild style central banks too, very telling wouldn't you say. In fact the only states now without a Rothschild style central bank are: North Korea, Cuba and Iran, I think, no others. Countries that recently had independent money systems but are now firmly in their usurious central banking grip are: Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.
If you are even slightly awake then, you should see a clear pattern here. A pattern that resonates with the recent history of the Anglo-Zionist Empire [US, UK, Israel] and it's war machine
Btw, the very first thing that the so called "rebels" [in reality they were CIA controlled terrorists] who ousted Gaddaffi from Libya did was set up a Rothschild style central bank! Before the coup was even completed! The first thing that the Anglo-Zionist Empire did in Libya was secure all the gold. There was a lot of it too because Gaddaffi was going to set up an African gold based currency, independent from the bad guys central banks. You can bet your life that the gold is not in Libya any more. His currency plans probably sealed his fate, the oil was very handy for the oligarchs too.
I'm not exactly sure about Syria but I think they are now in this world system as well. That conflict is certainly not what it seems. There are deep currents that are not visible there.
You will also read in those few early comments that socialism is not the answer to this fundamental Usury/Capitalism/Finance problem that effects 90+% of all humanity. This is correct I think because the ALL socialist political systems that have EVER existed have been co-opted by the same oligarchs, who are usually hidden in the background.
Yes that includes Cuba too............... See my posts of September '17 and December '16 for my fuller explanations of why I think that.
And yes that includes the UK "Labour Party" as well.......... See the bios of the founders for starters. The sons and daughters of wealthy industrialists, financiers and the landed class. When did such people ever betray their own class? [Fidel was from great wealth too :-))] For further research on Labour then look at the Fabian Society and it's house university, the LSE in London. Every single Labour Prime Minister has been a Fabian. That says it all for me so I will stop there. Do your own research for proof of what I say, you won't need to try too hard.
The modern day oligarchs are the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Du Ponts, and their ilk, some of them being completely unknown to us all, probably how can we know? These are the $trillionaires. They ALWAYS lurk behind socialist, and communist, political systems. They fund them and they promote them using their media, they own ALL the media.
Why would they do that, you may say, why nurture socialists who want all of them gone? Simples, they love the centralised control that such systems bring. And they love to set one state against the other, the age old divide and rule. Such conflict usually leads to change. Change that, out of sight, they often steer in the direction that they pre-decided. Usually, but not always, ending up where they want. Centralised socialist/communist states are so much easier to control than democracies and republics too. They control all democracies as well of course............
But it seems that the centralised State is the oligarchs main desire. They call their dream scenario the "New World Order". A unified centralised World State under their control and probably, maybe, socialist. It's for the common good. That's what they want you to think anyway.............
The problem for us all, the 90+% that is, is that this is not a dream any more. It is fast becoming a reality. For example their UN, their NAU [North American Union ie. US, Canada & Mexico], their EU, their other regional superstates, their BIS, IMF, World Bank etc etc are all in place. All these numerous institutions are beholden to their fascistic money power. They were all set up by, and for, the fascist oligarchs, don't believe anyone who tells you different. Nothing that is so fundamental happens without their approval, nothing...................
At the $trillionaire level then, ALL the worlds states are under their control, yes including China and Russia too. Putin is a mere billionaire. Some think that he is some sort of saviour. Not me. They own all of the pols, all of them, without exception.
At some point, soon probably, they will unify their five key money systems [£, $, €, Yen and Renminbi/Yuan] into one world-wide electronic currency. There will be no cash that you can hide under your mattress then, none. There will be no private money at all in fact, money will only exist in their banksters computers.
When that happens then, you could be financially terminated at the flick of a screen. They have already introduced a "social credit" system in China. Which means any dissent leads to a low "social credit" score and such dissent could be punished by the restriction of your freedoms. Your fundamental freedoms like: association with others, travel, work, money, use of social media ie. "free" speech, etc etc. All could all be withdrawn by the State. See the Corbett Report if you don't believe me.
With a one-world electronic currency then it will definitely be game over for the 90+%. The fascists will have full control then. Universal social credit will be an inevitability after that, maybe even before.
Hopefully I will have shuffled off my mortal coil before that happens. I hope to live a good few years yet and, if I do then, I expect to see when that NWO day dawns. But I certainly expect that my children and grandchildren will live in such a world.
I guess that these dystopian thoughts bring me right back to the opening quote:
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free"
Maybe, when their New World Order is fully implemented then, it will be better to take the blue pill, and stay in the Matrix? To live the best way that you can and ignore all this, pretend that it never happened...........
When this is the best option then, Orwell's 1984 aphorism will be real:
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength
If you read the first few short comments at the end of the piece then, you will see some key related issues, relevant to all Brits and to all of humanity in fact. The largely unknown history, in the 1600's, of Oliver Cromwell, his Dutch/Jewish financiers, and the British landed gentry, is touched upon. I will briefly elaborate here.
The British aristocrats prior plunder of the Catholic churches wealth, followed by their control of the British Crown, via William of Orange, was used to set up their usurious Bank of England in 1694, only five years after William of Orange was crowned. William was actually chosen by the British oligarchs to be the king! There was no credible "succession" at all. They even admit that in Wikipedia, figuring that it is meaningless to most of their readers I guess.
It was an absolutely key period in British history. These fabulously wealthy, oligarchs and their Dutch based Jewish money men, followed by their descendants, have ruled over us ever since, make no mistake. They used/controlled the City of London and they went on to create the British Empire that plundered the rest of the world using the first international private corporations. Corporations like the British East India Company, which ran the sub-continent, ostensibly on behalf of the British State, but in reality on behalf of the private wealthy owners who actually owned the East India Company. It was a massive cash cow for the super rich of the time. In fact it was only disbanded in the 1800's by which time they effectively owned the British State lock stock and barrel.
The current oligarchs on-the-payroll historians of academia call the accession of William of Orange and the subsequent events "reforming" the Parliament, "the Glorious Revolution". It was glorious for the oligarchs certainly. Not so glorious for everybody else.
Their Bank of England was the worlds very first central bank of course. The "British" oligarchs owned it privately until 1946!! For 252 years!! They still control it today of course, even though they claim that it has been owned by the state since 1946. A claim that has never been properly proven of course because the public never sees the bank's audited accounts. They are only viewed privately, by insiders. So there is no real, demonstrable, democratic accountability at all. Wiki says "The Bank became an independent public organisation in 1998, wholly owned by the Treasury Solicitor on behalf of the government, but with independence in setting monetary policy." Yeah, sure.......
Pretty well very single country in the world now has a British [Rothschild] type of central bank. The worlds other key central bank is the Federal Reserve in the US. It is still privately owned, largely by the Rothschilds and their agents. China and Russia have Rothschild style central banks too, very telling wouldn't you say. In fact the only states now without a Rothschild style central bank are: North Korea, Cuba and Iran, I think, no others. Countries that recently had independent money systems but are now firmly in their usurious central banking grip are: Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.
If you are even slightly awake then, you should see a clear pattern here. A pattern that resonates with the recent history of the Anglo-Zionist Empire [US, UK, Israel] and it's war machine
Btw, the very first thing that the so called "rebels" [in reality they were CIA controlled terrorists] who ousted Gaddaffi from Libya did was set up a Rothschild style central bank! Before the coup was even completed! The first thing that the Anglo-Zionist Empire did in Libya was secure all the gold. There was a lot of it too because Gaddaffi was going to set up an African gold based currency, independent from the bad guys central banks. You can bet your life that the gold is not in Libya any more. His currency plans probably sealed his fate, the oil was very handy for the oligarchs too.
I'm not exactly sure about Syria but I think they are now in this world system as well. That conflict is certainly not what it seems. There are deep currents that are not visible there.
You will also read in those few early comments that socialism is not the answer to this fundamental Usury/Capitalism/Finance problem that effects 90+% of all humanity. This is correct I think because the ALL socialist political systems that have EVER existed have been co-opted by the same oligarchs, who are usually hidden in the background.
Yes that includes Cuba too............... See my posts of September '17 and December '16 for my fuller explanations of why I think that.
And yes that includes the UK "Labour Party" as well.......... See the bios of the founders for starters. The sons and daughters of wealthy industrialists, financiers and the landed class. When did such people ever betray their own class? [Fidel was from great wealth too :-))] For further research on Labour then look at the Fabian Society and it's house university, the LSE in London. Every single Labour Prime Minister has been a Fabian. That says it all for me so I will stop there. Do your own research for proof of what I say, you won't need to try too hard.
The modern day oligarchs are the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Du Ponts, and their ilk, some of them being completely unknown to us all, probably how can we know? These are the $trillionaires. They ALWAYS lurk behind socialist, and communist, political systems. They fund them and they promote them using their media, they own ALL the media.
Why would they do that, you may say, why nurture socialists who want all of them gone? Simples, they love the centralised control that such systems bring. And they love to set one state against the other, the age old divide and rule. Such conflict usually leads to change. Change that, out of sight, they often steer in the direction that they pre-decided. Usually, but not always, ending up where they want. Centralised socialist/communist states are so much easier to control than democracies and republics too. They control all democracies as well of course............
But it seems that the centralised State is the oligarchs main desire. They call their dream scenario the "New World Order". A unified centralised World State under their control and probably, maybe, socialist. It's for the common good. That's what they want you to think anyway.............
The problem for us all, the 90+% that is, is that this is not a dream any more. It is fast becoming a reality. For example their UN, their NAU [North American Union ie. US, Canada & Mexico], their EU, their other regional superstates, their BIS, IMF, World Bank etc etc are all in place. All these numerous institutions are beholden to their fascistic money power. They were all set up by, and for, the fascist oligarchs, don't believe anyone who tells you different. Nothing that is so fundamental happens without their approval, nothing...................
At the $trillionaire level then, ALL the worlds states are under their control, yes including China and Russia too. Putin is a mere billionaire. Some think that he is some sort of saviour. Not me. They own all of the pols, all of them, without exception.
At some point, soon probably, they will unify their five key money systems [£, $, €, Yen and Renminbi/Yuan] into one world-wide electronic currency. There will be no cash that you can hide under your mattress then, none. There will be no private money at all in fact, money will only exist in their banksters computers.
When that happens then, you could be financially terminated at the flick of a screen. They have already introduced a "social credit" system in China. Which means any dissent leads to a low "social credit" score and such dissent could be punished by the restriction of your freedoms. Your fundamental freedoms like: association with others, travel, work, money, use of social media ie. "free" speech, etc etc. All could all be withdrawn by the State. See the Corbett Report if you don't believe me.
With a one-world electronic currency then it will definitely be game over for the 90+%. The fascists will have full control then. Universal social credit will be an inevitability after that, maybe even before.
Hopefully I will have shuffled off my mortal coil before that happens. I hope to live a good few years yet and, if I do then, I expect to see when that NWO day dawns. But I certainly expect that my children and grandchildren will live in such a world.
I guess that these dystopian thoughts bring me right back to the opening quote:
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free"
Maybe, when their New World Order is fully implemented then, it will be better to take the blue pill, and stay in the Matrix? To live the best way that you can and ignore all this, pretend that it never happened...........
When this is the best option then, Orwell's 1984 aphorism will be real:
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength
