Jeremy's New World Order

Hope and Change? Or was that some other political puppet?

Extract from Jeremy's pre-election speech at Chatham House:

"I am often asked if as prime minister I would order the use of nuclear weapons. It’s an extraordinary question when you think about it – would you order the indiscriminate killing of millions of people? Would you risk such extensive contamination of the planet that no life could exist across large parts of the world? If circumstances arose where that was a real option, it would represent complete and cataclysmic failure. It would mean world leaders had already triggered a spiral of catastrophe for humankind.

Labour is committed actively to pursue disarmament under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and we are committed to no first use of nuclear weapons. But let me make this absolutely clear. If elected prime minister, I will do everything necessary to protect the safety and security of our people and our country. That would be my first duty." Bold is my emphasis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rhMKu9F9xw

The full text of Jeremy's speech at Chatham House is in the notes underneath the vid. You should watch the vid first, it is quite short.

In case you are not aware then, Chatham House is the public face of the Royal Institute for International Affairs. [It's sister in the US is the Council on Foreign Relations]. Both of these "think tanks" are important parts of the current "Western" power structure. ie. the Anglo/US/Zionist apparatus that subverts democracy on behalf of the oligarchs who rule over us.

The origins of both the RIIA, and the CFR, were within the Rhodes/Milner group of the start of the 20th C. You know, those "British" guys who were instrumental in arranging WW1. British my arse, they were international monopoly capitalists. The RIIA and CFR were both formed in the early 1920's in preparation for Act 2.

Jeremy must surely know all of this. But his fealty to them is essential if he is to be allowed by them to become PM. It's the oligarchical brown nosing equivalent to joining the Queens Privy Council.

The QPC is another, democracy subverting, UK Establishment cabal made up of politicians from both major parties, judges and other bigwigs. It's affairs are totally secret, which all members take a solemn oath to maintain, so there are no public minutes. It is chaired by the Queen herself and all members must also swear an oath to their fealty to the Queen as well. An oath which places their loyalty to her above their loyalty to the British people. The same British people who "elected" all those politicians to "represent" them. So much for democracy then.

Apologists for the QPC will tell you that it is purely ceremonial, that it's meetings are inconsequential and insignificant. If you believe that then you will believe that I played center forward for Everton when we won the league in 1970. And that I scored 45 goals that season including 7 hat-tricks! Do I really need to spell it out? If the QPC is so inconsequential then why are its affairs totally secret?

Jeremy had already joined the QPC when he made his Chatham House speech. In his first week as Labour leader in fact.

Of course all politicians want to have their cake and eat it don't they. But us plebs are not obliged to accept that are we. So we shouldn't let them get away with that. It is quite simply really:

Either the senior pols that are putting themselves forward for holding power really will have the ability to make the changes that they claim that they will.

Or they are beholden to a hidden power structure, the oligarchs and their Doge, her majesty.

Jeremy's knowtowing to them is a very good indicator which it is.

I expect that the blinkered die-hard Corbynites will ignore all this, that their old fashioned tribal politics will trump their principles as usual.

Final thoughts:

It is widely known that the US now has "boots on the ground", in al-Tanf, in southern Syria; they have set up a base there it seems. So they have invaded a sovereign country without any UN sanction, quelle surprise. And, given that it is widely assumed that the UK also has troops there, or just over the border in Jordan, ready to join the action, is it not incumbent upon Her Majesties Opposition to actually oppose and ask questions in Parliament? But we don't hear a peep do we? Nothing from the "opposition" and nothing from the mainstream media.

The subject is off limits it appears. Almost certainly because the invasion is illegal and so the Deep State oligarchs have decreed a blanket silence. Chatham House, Queens Privy Council, or some other anti democratic decision making body? We will never know because it is all done in secret.

Update 3rd August 2017

The al-Tanf invasion was a failure.

Quoting The Saker:

"The best illustration of this reality is the latest American debacle in the al-Tanf region near the Jordanian border. The Americans, backed by the Jordanians, quietly invaded this mostly empty part of the Syrian desert with the hope of cutting off the lines of communications between the Syrians and the Iraqis. Instead, what happened was that the Syrians cut the Americans off and reached the border first, thereby making the American presence simply useless (see here and here for details). It appears that the Americans have now given up, at least temporarily, on al-Tanf, and that US forces will be withdrawn and redeployed elsewhere in Syria."

No mention of the Brits. Maybe they saw the lie of the land and stayed away. My point in the main blog is no less valid now that the invasion failed.

See this link. The quotation is the last para under the section headed "Good terrorists, aka “FSA”, Syria 2017" :

http://thesaker.is/the-end-of-the-wars-on-the-cheap-for-the-united-states/


Update 4th September 2017

Seems that the Brits were in al-Tanf after all:

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/british-troops-withdraw-south-syria-end-training-militants/

This is not democracy

Worse, by voting then, you give them your consent

When both major parties are bankrolled by private vested interests then,
this is not democracy

When over 50% of the votes cast in the UK's " First Past The Post" electoral  system are in "safe" constituencies, where there is no possibility whatsoever of turning out the incumbent individual, or party, then,
this is not democracy

When mainstream media can, and does, fake any "news" it wants to and is never held to account by any politician, or any law, then,
this is not democracy

When the Westminster  bubble political class of all parties is united in self interest and often against the people's interest then.
this is not democracy

When the electorate is, in the main, supine, indifferent, ill informed and distracted by trivia then,
this is not democracy

Over 2000 years ago Plato said that a democracy is only possible when it has a
powerful, discerning, informed and undistracted electorate.

In 2017 Cruel Brittania we have none of these, so:

This is not democracy


What is even worse?

By voting then, you consent to the "winner" having "power"

This "power", regardless of who it is actually exercised by, is now always used against ordinary people's interest.

In many undemocratic ways, certainly including the following:

1. To wage evil war on weaker countries
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria most recently.
At the human level then we are all Afghans, Iraqis, Libyans, Syrians.
These are just the wars that their mainstream media told you about, there are others.
2 Labour wars. 2 Tory wars. All part of the false "War on Terror".
No UK politician has ever disowned this falsehood, other than Robin Cook.

2. To maintain a 2 tier legal system
One law for us, another for them.
They never go to prison. They are above the law. Even for war crimes. 
An example: Tony Blair was convicted of war crimes, in 2011 in Malaysia.
But of course he is fully protected in the West and will never go to court, never mind prison.
Another example: All those senior Banksters who cheated us out of millions £; they skated too.

3. To steal the wealth of the people
Via the privately owned  "fractional reserve" money system.
Which steals your money via interest on everything that you buy. It equates to over 40%!
And increasingly centralised government, which is controlled by the same private owners.
Controlled central government which steals your money via unnecessarily excessive taxation.
And then there is all the privatisation. We live in a kleptocracy

There is far more; consider the 3 above as examples.


This corrupt, private, money system is in fact at the root of the mad requirement for permanent "economic growth". Mad because we live on a finite planet, so permanent growth is ultimately impossible.

This economic madness in turn drives the ever increasing consumption that is destroying the planet. [Environmentalists: Wake up! Follow the money......]

The corrupt money system truly is the "root of all evil" as the old saying goes.

Don't believe me? Then wake up and smell the coffee. Do some research.

Start by asking yourself this:

Given that the government of all sovereign nations has the ability to create money in exactly the same way that the private banks do, ie. at the touch of a keyboard, then,
Why do they never do this for their own expenditure?
Why do they always pay interest to private banks?
And then tax us to pay that interest?

It is because most of the worlds governments have been captured by the International Banksters. Who effectively own the government by owning the establishment and political class.[See Appendix 1].

So these politicians always choose the expensive option that we the people are obliged to pay for, via that excessive taxation. We pay every which way round.

How are these politicians controlled then?

There are many ways, the elite owned main media and the resulting groupthink are crucial.

Along with the corporate and private "donations" that fund all the political parties in the West. And delayed individual payment for services rendered.  All the well known politicians receive their pay off after they leave the government. The revolving door between politics and business & finance works at all political levels too, not just for the bigwigs.

Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, all made a fortune after they left number 10.
3 Tory, 2 Labour. It is alleged that Thatcher made over £50 million. Blair certainly made tens of £millions, probably far more. We will never know because they hide all their dosh from public view via the usual methods; tax havens and the like.

Most of the others, the less well known ones stick their snouts in the trough too. Many of them when they are still in Parliament. It's all perfectly "legal".

There are plenty of other carrots too. I will mention one of the sticks later on.


Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron - all were most definitely subservient to International Finance. None of them ever stood up to the Banksters.

Do you think that May, or Corbyn, will be any different?

That they will not be subservient to International Finance?

More fool you if you do.

He who pays the piper always calls the tune

So I deny them my consent

How about you?



They ran another one of their facilitated, probably even staged, ISIS terror events recently.
Here is one view of the real political pecking order:

Clearly whoever will be British PM would be higher up this list than the US President. ie. lower in the pecking order

The relevant information is freely and easily available today so, anyone, if they care to look that is, can see that ISIS is a convenient proxy to serve the needs of the Western power structure. Denying this reality is ignorance by choice.

This is of course yet another satisfactory scenario for the US ziofascist criminals who did 9/11 and their friends in the UK and elsewhere. They are still laughing at all the idiots who still believe that the CIA's creation, "al Qaeda", were responsible.

Do you think that there are any senior UK politicians who do not know all of everything that I've written? In any party? I doubt it and, if there are, then they must be idiots too.

Will any of them ever tell us ordinary people? Of course they won't, that would be political suicide.

Such is the cancerous political world that we live in today.



For those who are not wide awake then here are 2 links to moderate alt-media. There are many, many, more.

How the dead terrorist/patsy ID is always found at the scene:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/manchester-berlin-paris-nice-london-new-york-passports-and-ids-mysteriously-discovered-in-the-wake-of-terror-attacks/5592063
A consistent theme. Dead perp whose ID is found immediately.

The terrible truth about the Manchester attack:
https://theburningbloggerofbedlam.wordpress.com/2017/05/25/the-terrible-truth-about-the-manchester-attack-the-british-government-salman-abedi/#more-28594

When you read this link then you will surely wonder to yourself: if this one guy can uncover so much then wtf are the "professional" journalists doing? The answer is very clear too. The "professional" journalists job is not to uncover the truth. It is to cover it up so the plebs cannot see the systemic corruption in the body politic and the fourth estate.

The article also undeniably demonstrates that this specific UK State involvement in Islamic terrorism, in Libya, "started in the early 1990's". So it was carried out under both Tory and Labour governments then ie. both of the main UK political parties. Lots of the existing MP's were MP's at the time. This continuity is consistent and gives the lie to the "we will change things" that the politicians always spout at election time.

I'm 67 in August and I've heard the same politicians "we will change things" lie too many times to mention. They never, ever, deliver.

The Burning Bloggers book "The Libya Conspiracy" is linked in his article and is free to download. If you want to know the real Libya story, as opposed to the main media bullshit story, then read his book. You will learn a heck of a lot more about the real ways of British politicians too if you do. Lies, lies and more lies. Well what did you expect? Lying is their main attribute. They all need to be expert liars. It never ceases to amaze me that people believe them at election time. The triumph of hope over reality I suppose.


Back to the main theme. One of their control sticks is paedophilia:

Why do you think that all the political and establishment paedophilia is always covered up?

It is because if a politician's paedophilia is exposed then, his or her career is over. It is much better from the controllers point of view to to cover up the crime. That way the politician can be blackmailed into compliance if necessary.

The carrot of riches and the stick of disgrace. It's an old trick and it works most of the time.

But it certainly isn't democracy.

In fact the fascists took charge and killed any real democracy many decades ago. See my earlier post:

http://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/the-real-matrix.html


In this weirdly connected, and at the same time disconnected, cyber society that we now find ourselves then, voting for political puppets will not change any of these numerous fundamental problems that I have briefly touched upon.

The only possible way of reforming this fake, constipated and corrupt western culture is from completely outside the current system.

A mass reform movement needs to come from somewhere beyond the current legislature. It will certainly never come from within it.

Anyone who thinks that it will is simply deluded


Finally, some very broad thoughts about how reforms are essential:

We need to develop a Citizen First policy that gives the people more real power. A real proportional and representative system. Isn't that what democracy is supposed to be about?

We need a Citizen First policy that rejects the dead ideologies that are based on Adam Smith and Karl Marx too. [Free market capitalism and socialism]. Both have failed dramatically and at massive human cost too. Small is beautiful. Local is beautiful. Community is beautiful.

We need to focus on human beings, not Big State systemics. The overweening Big Brother/Nanny State is a massive part of our current problem. It is not part of any viable solution. We need a small, sovereign, State. And free, sovereign, people. A focus on humans not big systems. We already have the necessary technology. We don't need the Big State telling us what we can do or think or say.

We desperately need reform of public Education too. This is absolutely essential to create an informed electorate. Kick out all the useless, politically correct, measurement dogma. The league tables, the SATs, the end of school certification etc etc. Return to the classical methods that teach children how to think for themselves. Rather than parrot "knowledge" via multiple choice testing.

Reform of all of our other corrupt Establishment institutions will be essential too: Finance, Media, Law, Intelligence, Military, Corporations and more. Finance and Media are the priorities as I've already outlined. Everything else depends on these 2. It's a herculean task.


We certainly need to develop a new system, the old one is irreparably broken.

We haven't got a choice really. If we don't institute massive change then disaster is just round the corner.

The new methods need to be based on the creative power of human communities, collective human consciousness if you like.

Not the censorious bullying of failed dogmatic systems, run by corrupt and massively over privileged gobshites.


Pigs might fly......

But hope springs eternal


Appendix

Here is a quote from the 19th century:



The quote is widely believed to be accurate but there is no source verification that I can find. No matter, the principle is certainly accurate. This principle still holds good today.

The Banksters are a now a diverse crew that includes Wall Street and the City of London, the Intelligence Agencies, the Pentagon, the military and the arms companies, the oil companies, the multinational corporations, including both information and entertainment media, and more. With dishonourable mentions for the Vatican and Israel. Together they make up the various factions of the global Deep State.

So it is now far more complex than the 19th century, but the principle is unchanged.

The Banksters still rule and the politicians still dance to their tune.

The politicians job is to represent the people; to put the peoples view to the "power".
But under the current system they do the exact opposite.
The represent the "power"; they put the "powers" decisions to the people.

Addendum

Morris put this out a few days ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpdej6O1OPg

A very similar theme to my post.

Addendum 2

And this one too:
https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/06/news-views-nefarium-june-1-2017/

Manchester, May, Trump and the Saudis. Geopolitics and Britain's role in Islamic terrorism.

Addendum 3

False flag creations by CrISIS Solutions:
http://tapnewswire.com/2017/06/crisis-solutions-inc-is-running-all-terror-false-flags-worldwide-check-out-their-website/

False flags are us.

JFK TV

Did JFK really die in Dallas?

Read this and you may wonder.

The term "conspiracy theorist" was originally conceived by the CIA to slander those that questioned the "official" JFK story, as delivered by the Warren Commission via the mainstream media. In those days there was no internet and, given that the mainstream media was totally controlled even then [see my last post], books were the only way of reading alternative explanations or "conspiracy theories" as the CIA slander went.

[There was the nominally independent "underground" press too. But this was comparatively tiny circulation and very likely controlled opposition in many cases. A bit like the modern alternative media is today]

The official JFK story was so obviously fake that a whole new investigative genre arose. I mean, come on, the clear patsy "assassin" was "killed" on live TV in a police station ffs. After being pronounced guilty by media within the first 24 hours. No need for a real investigation. They got their man immediately and told the whole world.

Fair trial? Due process? Really dead? Oswald was an early "terrorist death" by gunshot without any blood. How many times have we seen that recently?

[See Westminster Bridge "terrorist" for the latest iteration. In fact a dead patsy is standard operating procedure for these "terror" events. The terror is primarily in the minds of the TV audience. Your chance of death by terrorism is infinitesimally small. Just about every known risk to humans is a worse risk than "terrorism"]

The whole official JFK story was utterly stupid if you gave it any serious thought, which most didn't having been overcome by their emotions. As a result hundreds of books were written offering alternative explanations, many of which I read. So I was an early "conspiracy theorist" then.

Of course the non believers like myself were in a small minority in those days. Most people were just not interested and swallowed the main media bullshit story - hook, line and sinker. I thought that it tasted foul and spat it out immediately.

It was only after 9/11 when a similar ludicrous explanation was delivered by another very obviously rigged Commission that the term "conspiracy theorist" really took off. The blue pill swallow'rs used it to abuse the red pill non believers. Just like the CIA wanted them to - fuckwits.

Now we are legion. I am constantly surprised by the sort of people who have now taken the red pill and unplugged from the Matrix. The rapid abandonment of belief in the main media stories is snowballing. We are still in a minority but a growing minority for sure.

This is why our fascist owners are hurrying along with their New World Order programme. They know that it is simply a matter of time before we become a significant minority, maybe even a majority.

I have copied and pasted the introductory paragraphs to this thought provoking book below. 

My emphasis is in italics.

The link to the full book is at the end.

The Kennedy
Assassination as
Television Programming

Compiled and Edited for Committee Referral by
Tyrone McCloskey

“Orthodoxy means not thinking- not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.”
― George Orwell, 1984

Read This First

This book can be read as a spoof of JFK research or as nonfiction, your choice. Because none of the radical content of this book is provable beyond a reasonable doubt, there is no reason to insist that what is offered is fact. There are some facts included, but the premise and conclusion herein may seem more like satire than reasoned speculation. I won’t hold a gun to your head and insist you believe anything in this volume.

That said, the fact that a half-century of research has not produced a definite answer to the JFK assassination, nor has it brought anyone to justice, it is long overdue to question whether or not the assassination took place at all. And it’s reasonable to ask that question in a country that still insists it operates under the rule of law.

With that in mind, divest yourself of all assumptions about how the world works and try to keep your critical faculties engaged at the expense of your emotions. Within this fascist construct we now find ourselves, it is obvious that the faith we have had in “official” history has been misplaced. If history is, in fact, written by the victors, and there have been an endless stream of victors, what has passed for history is very likely a series of revisions building upon previous revisions until all facts are completely buried and beyond recall. But this is the method of conquerors from time immemorial: Separate the conquered from their past and they become a nameless herd to corral.

Faith Based Reality

We have been told since that fateful day in November of 1963 that the assassination of President John F Kennedy was a history-changing event. That concept, that the murder of the President affected history, is one of the common assumptions that feed the ongoing deception. It is assumed that the President of the United States has real power, that his decisions affect life on a global scale. Getting over that hurdle will be the first item of business as it is certain that real power is never seen and that the men who appear to be making decisions regarding public welfare are merely front men, or in the case of Ronald Reagan, a professional actor. [Trump too]

The other primary principle to accept for the sake of argument is that the mainstream corporate media, from which we initially derived our information about the Kennedy assassination, never reflects reality. What they do is present a parallel reality that is close in form but in fact is utter fiction; as an historical novel may utilize the histories of real people and places, so too does mainstream media, primarily television, salt their fictions with period detail to give the false reality a plausible facade.

Another way to conceive of this is that television is by its nature unable to reflect reality or it would be seen as utterly redundant; reality itself would suffice and the public would not be mesmerized by a world they need a television set to experience. Therefore, television must appear to reflect reality but skew the emotional impact of this facade to retain the viewer’s interest. To do this the television reports just enough plausible detail and then contextualizes these details within a prearranged narrative that subtly or even subconsciously sells an agenda that promotes this real time history as the only possible history, that which the unseen powers wish the public to believe is inevitable. This is history written by the victorious.

History written by the victorious? Nail on the head I think. All of our received history must surely be interpreted by us in this way, particularly the "rolling news" history that is rammed down TV news consumers throats.

This is a great piece of work by Tyrone McCloskey. It is book length so it needs a serious time commitment. This may put off the modern "sound bite" generation but those who do read through will be well rewarded.

The work is not for the fainthearted. To get the most from the book you best put your prior assumptions to one side. Something that the majority of people will not be able to do given that they took the blue pill and so are fully locked in the Matrix.

How about you?

https://pieceofmindful.com/2017/05/12/jfktv-new-revised/#more-68490

The real Matrix

How perception, culture and consciousness are subverted by media


First, here is a quote from the American, H L Mencken, the "Sage of Baltimore":

“Moral certainty is always a sign of cultural inferiority. The more uncivilized the man, the surer he is that he knows precisely what is right and what is wrong. All human progress, even in morals, has been the work of men who have doubted the current moral values, not of men who have whooped them up and tried to enforce them. The truly civilized man is always skeptical and tolerant, in this field as in all others. His culture is based on "I am not too sure.”

Mencken was a journalist, satirist, cultural critic and scholar of American English. He was certainly no saint but he was one of the most influential American writers of the first half of 20th C.

Please bear his quote in mind when you read on.


All the following paragraphs in italics were written in 2013. Well before the recent, ongoing and fake, "fake news" meme.

My comments in bold follow each section. My emphasis is underlined throughout.

"Consider, for instance, the word “liberal”, which I have just used above. The meaning of the word has flipped since the 1960's, and this flipping has been no accident or natural outcome of change. In 1968, a liberal was anti-war and distrustful of the government. If you thought the government was generally benign, that it was waging wars for good reasons, and that its corporate ties were healthy, you weren't a liberal, you were a conservative. That's what conservative implies: conserving the status quo. The government in 1968 was pretty much what it is now, minus a few degrees of evil, so that was the status quo. That was the way things were. If you were happy with that, you were a conservative, because you wished to conserve the current state of things. You were probably profiting from it very well. If not—if you wanted things to change drastically—you were a liberal. You wanted us to get out of Vietnam, quit fighting illegal and immoral wars, and start treating people all over the world better— including our own people.

Today, these terms have flipped in most important ways. It is now liberals who are more likely to be status quo. Liberals or Democrats no longer have much of a problem with continuous and illegal wars. Yes, the current anti-war movement still tends to come out of the Democratic Party, but it is so small it is almost negligible. Most liberals are now fine with war, as long as it benefits their personal portfolio. And polls have indicated for many years that liberals are more likely to trust the government, are more likely to desire a large government, and are less likely to believe conspiracy theories. It is now conservatives that are more likely to distrust the government. This is rich, because we now see many people—and not just the young—who style themselves conservative while acting like 1960's hippies. They may not dress like hippies (although, if they own Harleys, they may), but in many other respects, the similarities are striking. Their political talk is all about freedoms, they wear the “don't tread on me” patch, they fly the flag upside down, and they think of cops as pigs."

The above text is written about the US, but there are many similarities here in the UK too. For instance:

How could it be that here in the UK, the leftish, green, public intellectuals, the people that came from a tradition based on localism, degrowth, bioregionalism, and a fierce critique of international industrial capitalism, could end up supporting a multinational trading block backed by the world's rapacious banks, corporations and NeoLiberal politicians, ie. the European Union?
[Hat tip to Paul Kingsnorth for that summary]

Htf could this happen? What went so wrong?

Well, one of the reasons is that the Matrix is already here. We are all living in it. And left/right mainstream politics is just another a part of it.

Alongside the spooks, the Banksters, the Corporations, the lawyers, the military "defence" complex [offense more like], the media "entertainment" complex [mindfuck more like], the religions, the scientists and, and......

Word warfare has been one of the key tools in the setting up of the Matrix. We've known about it for a long time:

"George Orwell famously warned us of word warfare in 1948, with his Ministry of Truth and its Newspeak, but few have realized how pervasive it already was then, and how ubiquitous it has become since. Although the entire language has been flipped multiple times, most assume Orwell's world is still somewhere in the future: something to look out for. Most see only the obvious examples of Newspeak, like the Patriot Act or the Peacekeeper missile. But these overt cases are the least dangerous, precisely because they are overt. Much more sinister are the thousands of examples that have gone unrecognized. Word warfare has continued to remain mostly undetected, and the difficulty in detecting it has made it especially insidious. The government doesn't even have to ban or discourage study of Orwell, for instance, since it has found that many or most people take a warning of something as evidence it isn't happening. Most assume that because Orwell warned of Newspeak, and because Orwell is not discouraged or banned by the government, the government must not be running Orwellian programs. They assume the instances of Newspeak must be limited to a few high-profile and therefore defused cases, like the ones I mentioned above. Everyone can see through titles like the Peacekeeper missile, right? So how dangerous could that be? It is just an inside joke, right?

Like many other things, propaganda is best hidden in plain sight. It is most covert when placed where people least expect it—which is everywhere all the time. People expect a little buffoonery like the Peacekeeper missile, but they don't expect a Spanish Inquisition. That is, they don't expect everything to be a lie. It never occurs to them that the entire structure around them—language, news, media, entertainment, science, art, everything—is manufactured and false. They can even see a movie like The Matrix, which tells them precisely that, and they think it is something to do with the future, or with robot bugs. But it has nothing to do with the future. Both Orwell's Ministry of Truth and the Matrix have been functional for decades. The book 1984 was written in 1948, and they tell you Orwell switched the last two numbers as a convenience, warning that such a society might arise in about 40 years. But that isn't the right analysis. The year 1948 is important because it is the year after the founding of the CIA. Orwell actually wrote 1984 in 1947, and the book was published in 1948. Well, 1947 is year one of the CIA, which is the real Ministry of Truth, the real Matrix.

Military intelligence has since split into a hundred tentacles, with the CIA now just one of many factions and acronyms. But it is this squid that is the Matrix. It is this squid that is the Ministry of Truth."

The National Security Act became effective in the US on 18th September 1947. The US has been a National Security State ever since. The act enabled both the NSC and the CIA.

It also "reorganised" the US military. It was, in effect, a military coup. And it was the final nail in the coffin of US democracy.

Just look at the Wiki page. Could it say any less?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Act_of_1947


Of course they have maintained the illusion of a democratic system with their Congress and Presidential elections every few years. But Congress and the President are just for show. To keep the plebs thinking that their vote makes a difference. It doesn't. And it hasn't done since 1947, probably before then in fact.

Donald Trump is the current illustration of this. Don't look at what he says. Look at what he does. He has appointed an administration chock, full of senior Matrix individuals, full of senior Goldman Sachs people [5 so far], full of military people, full of Zionists, NeoCons and multi-billionaires. His Chief of Staff is a media man. And the Trump himself is an actor. Ffs could they be any more blatant about it?

One of the little known revelations within the recent Wikileak releases showed how Obumma's cabinet was exactly the same as that recommended to him by....... Citibank! As detailed in this hour long film here:

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-312-obama-a-legacy-of-ashes/

Maybe it was Goldman Sachs that instructed Trump who to appoint? 😄

In fact Goldman people were all over the Obumma administration as well. Goldman were massive contributors to the Obumma, the Killary "we came, we saw, he died" Clinton and the Trump campaigns too. Left/right means nothing to the Banksters.

Goldman people are all over the EU Establishment as well. Prodi, Monti, Draghi and Barroso all being corrupted by the Goldman "vampire squid".

For copious detail about the disgusting Goldman Sachs then watch another hour long film:

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-315-meet-goldman-sachs-the-vampire-squid/

Whichever way you look at it this dominance of the Banksters is a clear illustration of the real power pecking order. Mere Presidents are quite some way down the list. Puppets usually are of course.

It is certainly just 'business as usual'. But with a more lippy, and far less cool, puppet than the last one. It is a clear continuum. The National Security State continues with it's dominant Banksters and Corporations, with it's wars, it's financial theft on a gargantuan scale, it's 2 tier justice system etc etc. The main differences between the two "sides" being the noise, and hot air, around the edges. All pumped up by the Matrix media. So much hot air it is stifling.

[It is not the differences between the 2 sides that you need to focus on it is the agreements. They never ever discuss those of course. And the Matrix media is utterly silent on all those issues. Focus on what they don't talk about to get the big picture. Issues like money creation by private banks. And corporate person benefits for their corporations. And the Queens Privy Council and the Royal Prerogative. And, and, and.....]


The Matrix has run an 8 year US puppet cycle for over 30 years now. Daddy Bush. Clinton. Dumb ass Bush. Obama. Now Trump.

Right - left - right - left - right. Forward march - Not!

It amazes me that people fall for this simple con. 8 years of "our" President. 8 years of "theirs". Obumma with his hollow, meaningless "Hope and Change" and his personal drone kill list. Trump with his equally hollow, equally meaningless "Make American great again" and his immediate ramping up of drones in Yemen.

The media winds everybody up and the vitriol flows. To what end? All that emotional energy that could be put to good use but is wasted on an illusion. The National Security State steams along the same old destructive course. Humanity being mere pawns in the game from the insiders POV. It would be funny if it were not so serious.


Is it really any different here in the UK? Is it fundamentally different? Of course it isn't. The UK Deep State has been at it for far longer. It is more subtle than the US. It's media Matrix is slightly less obvious, but not much. We still follow the US unswervingly. Lots of the globalists are based in London. UK mainstream politics is just another flavour of the same kind of US shite.


Anyhow, back to the text.

What about the intellectuals, don't they oppose these word flippers?

Well often they do, but they are either bought onto the Matrix payroll. Or they are simply pushed aside by the official, dumbed down, Matrix culture; sidelined, irrelevant, ignored by the masses who don't even know that they exist.

"It is for this reason that the educated are free to say pretty much whatever they like: it just doesn't matter. They can have all the theories they like, and discuss them amongst themselves, and the CIA sees no good reason to intervene. So what if someone writes a book or paper proving the Matrix and revealing all its subtle forms? The book will not find a publisher, will be limited to a tiny audience, and the government may not even have to post a response or tape a denial. The mainstream media can drown out any real news, proof, or discovery with a million manufactured stories. They don't need to censor or outlaw anything, much less murder anyone, since it is much more efficient to simply bury any truth under a slagheap of fake murders, fake celebrity news, and fake commentary. Why create a martyr when it is much easier to create a pauper? Why kill a story when you can bury it without killing it?

The media is now so controlled and so ubiquitous, it could bury the Second Coming. Jesus could arrive and begin performing miracles and raising the dead, and the mainstream media would simply set up a bigger and brighter tent nextdoor, with more exciting CGI miracles and dead-raising. Christ wouldn't have a chance. He would be forgotten by Friday, pauperized and back in the carpentry business, building endtables for Pottery Barn."


You just know that he is correct in this don't you?

Tip for researchers: Look for "Operation Mockingbird". This is the CIA op from the early 1950's when they brought all the key US media under their control. It is still officially denied and it has another useless Wiki page, with minimal info. But there is plenty of info out there if you care to look. Mockingbird was never really terminated and now, in 2017 then, 90% of the world's media is owned by just 6 massive Corporations! So Wall Street owns most of the worlds media then. Wall Street is of course a key component of the Matrix.

These 6 Corporations are all fully "independent". And they guarantee a "free media" in the West. Really? Just research: "Bilderberg" for clear evidence that those "independent", and "free media", assertions are simply lies. And no the BBC isn't any different. It is fully signed up to the agenda.

[Btw this is also true about scientific publications. 6 companies control 90% of the worlds scientific publications. With similar malign impact no doubt]


Please don't tell me that the internet, or social media, are uncontrolled exceptions. Of course they aren't. 

They now pay whole armies of internet trolls, literally. The US & UK armed forces openly admit that they now have large specialist online units. To combat those pesky Rooskies they say. If you believe that then you'll believe anything.............

They fund, and therefore control, most of the alt media, the internet "opposition", too, the vast majority for sure.

They can censor, or delete, whatever content they want out of all social media. And they do.


How times change. We now live in a mad world of illusion, magic and faith.

Which is mainlined into human consciousness via the ubiquitous screen.

A screen world where nobody can possibly tell fact from fiction, so they don't even bother to try.

I saw it on the news, so it must be true.......

All this is aided by the deplorable degradation of Ejukashun too. I've already blogged about this here:

http://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/how-to-dumb-down-people.html

The people are losing, rather never even acquiring, the ability to think critically. The people are dumber than their ancestors from 100 years ago! It's no surprise given what they are up against.

Younger generations are even losing the ability to communicate face to face it seems. Their screen, and/or headphone, defence is always available. And it is frequently used to avoid real world conversation. Certainly with unsightly old giffers like me and much more widely too.

Sigh..... The fascists took control several decades ago and most people didn't even notice.


If the above rang some bells for you then, the whole article is well worth reading:

http://mileswmathis.com/matrix.pdf

ps

Is Mathis genuine then? Is Corbett genuine? Who knows. The very nature of a Limited Hangout is that a bucket load of truth is larded with insidious disinfo. Which is truth and which is disinfo then? It's very hard to spot the disinfo. There are many subtle techniques, like Neuro Linguistic Programming for instance.

Here is one definition of NLP that I have seen:

"A system of affecting the behavior or opinions or thoughts of another person or persons without their knowing you have done so, usually through the use of subtextual or subliminal cues, be they verbal or written.’ In other words, you talk about one subject, but what you’re really saying is something else. NLP is a version of mind control. Agencies like the CIA and other intelligence groups, plus the ‘business’ known as Public Relations are especially known for using NLP."

So, considering this together with my closing remarks then, both Mathis and Corbett could be Limited Hangouts.

I'm pretty sure that Snowden and Assange are LHs. They get too much mainstream coverage for them not to be. And Wikileaks has links directly into the heart of the globalist establishment, see here:

https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/03/that-wikileaks-thing/

You just need to think critically about it. And then form your own opinion. And even when you identify a LH then you can still learn a lot of truth if you are discerning. You will not be right all the time and you've just got to accept that.

And that leads me right back to my opening quote with its emphasis on skepticism, and tolerance.