Wednesday, 9 November 2016

Never mind Trump, he is a sideshow

The dark agenda behind globalism and open borders

With a postscript and some stings in the tail

The link below is to an interesting post from an astute alt-right blogger in the US, Brandon Smith.

Brandon predicted both the Brexit and Trump victories months in advance. I link his post today, about his Brexit and Trump predictions, at the end of my text:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3045-the-dark-agenda-behind-globalism-and-open-borders
Brandon hits some key points in his post, which I will summarise here:

First, the globalist new world order will be private and will totally dominate and subvert all governments. The global central banksters are private banks, not government owned or run. Their corporations are private businesses. These banksters and corporations already dominate all governments to a major degree. That must surely be obvious even to the dumbest of us. Banksters and Company Directors are private and they never, ever, go to jail do they. Even when they defraud us out of billions £/$. The globalists relentless push for privatisation is already well advanced.

Second, the globalist new world order will not be voluntary. The people will not have a choice. The people will not decide whether to retain the nation state or not. There will be no meaningful voting to decide who forms the world government. [Just like the EU, only 10 times more remote] Ordinary people will have no say whatsoever. Not that they have much of a say now.

Third, the elimination of national, and personal, sovereignty is essential for the globalists to succeed. To quote Brandon:
"....globalism is an outright war waged against the ideal of sovereign peoples and nations. It is a guerrilla war, or fourth generation warfare, waged by a small group of elites against the rest of us."
I am no great fan of the nation state, but it is one of the few protections that we have got against the globalists. That and our personal sovereignty under the Common, or Natural, Law. If the globalists get their way then both will cease to exist. Nations will be subsumed into regional superstates like the EU. Personal sovereignty will be subsumed into legalisms like "Human Rights". "Human Rights" that are given to us from on high and that can therefore just as easily be removed from on high. In fact our rights as human beings are now inherently ours under the Common Law. They cannot be removed by any government, or bankster, or corporation.

If you think that the insidious surveillance state is over powerful now then just wait for the next stage. You ain't seen nothing yet. This process of destruction of our sovereignty is already well advanced in truth. And we were never asked if that is what we wanted were we?

Fourth, open borders are a key part of the strategy to eliminate the nation state. And this means that, if they succeed in opening all the borders then, cultural diversity will eventually be eliminated, not celebrated. Obvious if you give it some thought. The globalists intend to destroy the nation state and destroy personal sovereignty and the people won't have any choice. Just like the German people were given no choice about their recent imposed mass immigration. Imposed on them by the EU fascists with the complicity of Frau Merkin.

Fifth, the fact that the globalists have planned their moves decades, generations, in advance. Humanity has been like lambs to the slaughter, literally so in the 20thC. The psychopathic globalists manipulated most, if not all, of the key 20thC events to suit their agenda. That manipulation has increased exponentially in the 21stC. All without a care for the tens, no hundreds, of millions of ordinary people who perished. Psychopaths for sure.

They are building a mental prison for us all aided by their lying, falsifying academia and media, both mainstream and alt. If we are not very careful then, soon there will be no way out.

Brandon suggests that we can fight back by pushing for:
* decentralisation
* volunteerism
* localism
* self reliance
* free participation or non-participation. ie. freedom from forced association

I would add:
* a return to classical education methods. Trivium and Quadrivium. Teach critical thinking
* government by the people, for the people. Kick out the psychos
* agricultural self sufficiency. The EU globalists have destroyed that here in the UK. But it can be rebuilt if we make the effort
The globalist central banks have created a financial Armageddon for the near future. There is no doubt that their policies have created this impending financial catastrophe. They cannot possibly "kick the can down the road" for much longer. That is clear to anyone who understands the way things are going just now.  It looks like they are going to blame it all on their opponents, and then use the chaos to try to convert their globalism into a corporatist world government. That means a fascist world government. A private world government.

They plan to cause such chaos that people will easily accede to their "solution" of even more centralisation under their control. The globalists have openly stated that they plan to have a world currency in place by the end of this decade.

Dangerous times are ahead folks. It will probably take decades, perhaps generations, before they fully seal the exits. They must be resisted at every step along the way.

Brandon Smith has an impressive archive which you can access at his site. Here are some extracts from the link:

"It has been well known and documented for decades that the push for globalism is a deliberate and focused effort on the part of a select “elite;” international financiers, central bankers, political leaders and the numerous members of exclusive think tanks. They often openly admit their goals for total globalization in their own publications, perhaps believing that the uneducated commoners would never read them anyway. Carroll Quigley, mentor to Bill Clinton and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is often quoted with open admissions to the general scheme:
“The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland; a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank… sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.” - Carroll Quigley, Tragedy And Hope"
and
"This mentality is evident in the systems that they build and exploit. For example, central banking in general is nothing more than a mechanism for driving nations into debt, currency devaluation, and ultimately, enslavement through widespread economic extortion. The end game for central banks is, I believe, the triggering of historic financial crisis, which can then be used by the elites as leverage to promote complete global centralization as the only viable solution.
This process of destabilizing economies and societies is not directed by the heads of the various central banks.  Instead, it is directed by even more central global institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements, as outlined in revealing mainstream articles like Ruling The World Of Money published by Harpers Magazine."
and
"I could quote globalists all day long, but I think you get the general idea. While some people see globalism as a “natural offshoot” of free markets or the inevitable outcome of economic progress, the reality is that the simplest explanation (given the evidence at hand) is that globalism is an outright war waged against the ideal of sovereign peoples and nations. It is a guerrilla war, or fourth generation warfare, waged by a small group of elites against the rest of us."
I recommend reading the whole of his post:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3045-the-dark-agenda-behind-globalism-and-open-borders



Here is Brandon's post today about Trumps "victory". You don't think that the UK and US are democracies do you? How quaint. Read this and you might realise that they ain't:

http://alt-market.com/articles/3055-trump-will-be-president-how-alt-market-predicted-the-outcome-five-months-in-advance


Postscript

Two obvious questions that arise from all this are:

1. Who exactly are these globalists?
2. How do they exercise their control?

Obviously the answers to these 2 questions are not something that they broadcast in their corporate media! But this site is a good starting point for researchers:

http://theglobalelite.org/globalists/

The globalists use a number of private "think tanks" and "committees" that will be familiar to most truth seekers. These are some of the key supra-governmental bodies that they use:

The Committee of 300
Bilderberg Group
Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]
Trilateral Commission

There is a brief overview of each of these important organisations in the above link.

There is also a flow diagram towards the end of the above link that shows the big picture for the whole of Anglo-American Zionist elite. You will find many familiar names, and some not so familiar.

I suspect that this site does not show the correct emphasis of the overt, and hidden, power relationships. For instance the CIA is a small box at the bottom left. I expect that it should have a more central, and larger, position. And wtf is Israel? So there is probably some significant misdirection going on. Let's face it, there usually is. But most of the key players will be in there I expect.

I view the site as a possible starting point, like I said. Not as the definitive statement. That doesn't exist anywhere as far as I know. If anyone knows different I will be grateful if they post a link in the comments.


The stings in the tail

Finally there are obviously some key global players that are missing from the above. The minor matters of the Russians, the Chinese, the Germans, and others.

Many observers think [hope?] that the Russians and the Chinese are some sort of anti-globalist bulwarks. I don't.

I think that they are both essentially within the globalist elites orbit. Also that both are now playing a key role in the move to a world government.

The Russians are back in their familiar "bogeyman" role. Familiar to those that remember the Cold War anyhow. It was bullshit then, and it's bullshit now. The Russians have never ever invaded Western Europe. It has always been the other way round.

And surely nobody thinks that Vlad Putin came from out of nowhere to lead Russia by accident? Come on! The world doesn't work that way. He must have been sponsored by powerful forces. But who were they? He has as dodgy a bio as Barry Obomber. I smell globalists/elites of some description.

What about China? Well, for starters, the globalists groomed and facilitated Mao. He was a Yale man. Skull and effin' Bones. Their man. The globalists also aided and facilitated Deng to generate their capitalist communism after Mao. They gave him some essential lessons in the legal person fiction. The big legalism con that I have blogged about before. It was an essential component of globalist capitalism in China. It did not exist in China before the globalists got to Deng. It was absent from the previous ancient Chinese legal code. It was an essential precondition for the globalist elites move into China. Do you really think that the globalists would move all their factories into a godless, commie, country and risk any loss of control? Don't be silly.

So the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their globalist pals were in bed with the Chinese "communists" from the get go. Just like they were with the Russian "communists" earlier. This is all documented, just not in the mainstream.

There is absolutely no contradiction here - the globalists don't give a damn about nations. Or ordinary people. Or political systems. They will back fascists, rightists, centrists, socialists or communists, as suits their purpose. They use the left more than the right, for various practical reasons, certainly not for any ideology. Think George Soros that arch globalist, finance capitalist, so called left leaning do-gooder, but really fascist multi-billionaire, scumbag. If you've been fooled by that cnut then you really are stuck in the Matrix.

They are truly international finance capitalists. They are without loyalty to anyone but themselves and their own kind.

The Chinese now want to see a world currency. China is already participating in the embryonic world currency, the SDR [Single Drawing Rights]. China joined in October this year with virtual silence in the mainstream corporate media too. Why this silence? Same old same old I guess. The Chinese are certainly a key component of the globalist strategy.

See this link for plenty of info on the SDR:

https://www.corbettreport.com/?s=sdr

Order out of chaos is the tried and tested globalist technique that they have used time and again. Just ask the Russians and Germans, who bore the brunt in Europe in the 20thC.

And order out of chaos is exactly how the globalists kick started their EU project. It was actually conceived by the globalist German elites prior to WW2. They called it the "Europaische Wirtschaftsgemainschaft" which translates as the "European Economic Community"!

Old timers will instantly realise that this is the exact same name that was used by the globalists after the war to develop their fledgling superstate which subsequently became the EU. Order out of chaos for sure.

Time will soon tell if I am correct about China and Russia. I hope that I'm wrong tbh. It would be good to think that some section of the worlds elites are on our side, on the peoples side. But I'm not holding my breath. All the previous history points in the other direction.



Thursday, 3 November 2016

How the US election exposes the "Shadow Government"

Wikileaks and the US deep state


The current US election cycle is the craziest yet. It confirms many of the so called "Conspiracy Theories" about the realities of modern political power. And straight from the horses mouth too.

If you are interested in the way the system really works then watch this:

https://jaysanalysis.com/2016/11/03/bombshell-top-clinton-wikileaks-exposes-entire-shadow-government-jay-dyer-vid/


More here too:

Hillary’s ‘Russian Hack’ Hoax: The Biggest Lie of This Election Season

http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/11/01/hillarys-russian-hack-hoax-the-biggest-lie-of-this-election-season/


Thursday, 27 October 2016

Are you brainwashed?

Plus some thoughts about Brexit and reality



Update # 1 - Same day

The War on Reality

Scroll to end for update


-------------------- original post---------------------------------------------

To get an idea how brainwashed you are then: ask yourself the following 25 questions.

If you answer yes to any of them then: you’ve been brainwashed.

Do you believe that:


1 People at the top of the power structure have your, and the Earths, best interests at heart
2 A deep state, or shadow government, does not exist; politicians are at the top of the power structure
3 Politicians work for the people, rather than this shadow government
4 Democracy is in a healthy condition and there is no need for major electoral reform
5 The UN works for, and on behalf of, the people
6 The EU works for, and on behalf of, the people
7 The legal system works for, and on behalf of, the people
8 Personal freedom is built into our legal, and "human rights", systems
9 Mainstream media and TV provides generally accurate information; and that information reflects the truth about what’s happening in our world
10 Private banks loan pre-existing money, rather than creating money out of thin air
11 We need private banking organizations to run our money creation system
12 The current, debt and usury [interest] based, money system is not a tool of enslavement
13 Academics and scientists are independent of, and not beholden to, this money power
14 The widespread suffering by poor people across our planet is a result of natural forces; and not this money power
15 Wars are natural political events; and not the creations of this money power
16 Adding chemicals to our food, water, air and medicine is good for our health
17 The medical/pharmaceutical complex always wants to create cures, not customers
18 Vaccinating a 2 month old baby certainly does not poison it
19 Finding the cures for cancer is more important than finding the causes of cancer
20 Scientific research results are not fixed to the advantage of the corporations funding the research
21 Natural therapies are pseudoscience and not effective
22 The state education system is designed to educate children in the best possible way
23 Reality is only made of ‘matter’, and consciousness is its byproduct
24 There is empirical evidence for Darwinian evolution
25 There is empirical evidence that the Universe was created in the Big Bang; and that gravity is the key force at play

If you answered yes to any of these questions, then you are brainwashed to some degree.
The more yeses, the more brainwashed you are.
You’ve got some study to do.

Your consolation is that: You are not alone!

Don’t believe me though; do your own research before the open information internet becomes fully controlled.

[Thanks to Phillip J Watt]


With the current state of the world then, that anyone could want the status quo to continue is utterly incomprehensible to me.

I think that this thought was a key underlying psychological driver for the UK's Brexit vote last summer. It was not necessarily a conscious thought.

Virtually the whole of the UK political class was united in campaigning for Remain, ie. to maintain the status quo. The only senior pols who campaigned for Brexit looked to be, and turned out to be, stooges. Our Imperial overlords from the US even sent their head puppet, Obomber, over here to instruct us all to vote Remain. That probably sealed it.

A clear majority of the people wanted to give the whole political class a good hard kicking. If that included the US overlords then all the better. Particularly those people whose interests have been consistently ignored by the London bubble elite. It was a well deserved good hard kicking if you ask me. Which was duly delivered on referendum day. Whenever else do people get the chance to kick them?

Most ordinary people are not stupid. Many may be badly educated, most are very badly informed, but they are not stupid. Though they are treated by the pols, and the corporate media, as if they are.

My motives were somewhat different, as readers of this blog will know. I am fundamentally opposed to the globalist, corporate fascist, elite created and driven EU.

I am opposed for ideological reasons.

I am anti globalism. I am anti corporatism [fascism]. I am anti elitism.

You cannot be anti those and also be pro the  EU.

That is Doublethink.

And, hey, it felt very good to administer the kicking with everybody else. It was worth it just to see the pigs squeal as the realisation dawned about what was happening. The look on their faces was a picture. One of the few highlights, among the many lowlights of 2016.

It will not make much difference in the end, hard Brexit, soft Brexit or no Brexit. The advantaged classes will still stay advantaged, and all the rest will be ignored as usual.

Of course the elites media continually tells you that Brexit will be a disaster, or a triumph, depending on who you read. Certainly a disaster according to the reprehensible faux left faction of the elites media. [Who are actually NeoLiberal and NeoCon in reality]. Media like the BBC and the Guardian. If you believe all their old rubbish then you really are stuck in the Matrix. You must still be taking the blue pill. The evidence for their institutional mendacity is overwhelming.

So, for some light relief, here is some more clear evidence of that media mendacity, not that you should really need it. This one is about the Dallas cop shooting last summer. When a few cops were "killed" by "snipers" in Dallas. You didn't think that was real did you? Of course it wasn't! It was all just another act, yet another psyop, a psychodrama. Part of the ongoing "gun control" rubbish that they keep pumping out. One of many such in 2016.

Light relief? Wtf? Watch this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLNcH_XeVVc

The contrived, or false, stories in the media this year have turned from a deluge into a torrent. They are blatant and often transparent. They really do think that we are idiots. Is anything that they show us actually real? Precious little it seems to me. I have said it before and I say it again:

My working assumption for all main media stories, particularly on the TV, is that they are false by major omission, or outright false. Just about everything they show us nowadays fits into one of these categories.

They lie as a matter of routine. Black is white. Up is down. Right is Left.

Orwell was so prescient when he wrote:

"War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength."



So stop worrying folks, that's what they want you to do.

And stop getting angry, that's what they want you to do.

And stop blaming other groups of ordinary people, that's what they want you to.

It's mostly bullshit and you cannot be sure that what they show you on TV is actually real.

In fact, if its on the TV "News" then, most probably it isn't.

You might just as well ignore it. That's what they don't want

So that's what I do.

You should try it sometime, it's very liberating.


Update # 1 - Same day

The War on Reality: How the globalists occupy your mind to control everything

This is a very powerful short film that supports, and thoroughly surpasses, my post:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZbhCeUWa1A

------------------------------------ends----------------------------


Tuesday, 18 October 2016

From Democracy to Pathocracy

The political psychopaths who rule over us

This post was prompted by my recent conversations with my wonderful, caring and thoughtful, left leaning, Corbynite, son. I was struggling for coherence under his relentless, intelligent, questioning when we chatted at my home one evening last week.

I had already identified the following commentary from John Whitehead, and I had drafted a much shorter post than this turned out to be. I have expanded my comments to attempt to explain myself more fully to my dear son, and hopefully to all readers.

---------------------------------- post ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is very evident today that many politicians are sociopathic, and that many are psychopathic.

For well known examples of political psychos think about:

* Thatcher
* Blair
* Brown
* Cameron, and now 
* May

3 Tories & 2 Labour.

Thatcher destroyed vast swathes of British industry, caring not a jot for her unfortunate victims in the UK who were thrown out of work. Or beaten to a pulp by her fascist police.

Blair has more blood on his hands than any of the Tories. Think about his war crimes in Serbia, Afghanistan and especially Iraq. He is notorious for his indifference to his hundreds of thousands, probably millions, of victims. 

Brown was notorious for his sociopathic treatment of people who crossed him. A deeply flawed sociopath, at least. He kept out of the limelight whilst financially facilitating all Bliars wars too. So he has blood on his hands as well

Cameron was doing his worst to catch Blair up. Think Libya and Syria. Tens, probably hundreds, of thousands of deaths. His part in the systematic destruction of Libya was a clear war crime. As I've demonstrated in my UN post last month.

May presided over the expansion of the security surveillance state when Home Secretary. She exhibits all the same traits as the others.


Today it seems that people have forgotten that:

"....our freedoms do not flow from the government. They were not given to us only to be taken away by the will of the State. They are inherently ours. In the same way, the government’s appointed purpose is not to threaten or undermine our freedoms, but to safeguard them".

All educated people knew this at one time. But in the 21stC many people seem to have forgotten this important fact.

Here are some extracts from a commentary from the US that will remind us. My comments at the end:

Source: http://rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/from_democracy_to_pathocracy_the_rise_of_the_political_psychopath

"Politicians are more likely than people in the general population to be sociopaths. I think you would find no expert in the field of sociopathy/psychopathy/antisocial personality disorder who would dispute this... That a small minority of human beings literally have no conscience was and is a bitter pill for our society to swallow — but it does explain a great many things, shamelessly deceitful political behavior being one.”—Dr. Martha Stout, clinical psychologist and former instructor at Harvard Medical School

Twenty years ago, a newspaper headline asked the question: “What’s the difference between a politician and a psychopath?


The answer, then and now, remains the same: None.


There is no difference between psychopaths and politicians.


Nor is there much of a difference between the havoc wreaked on innocent lives by uncaring, unfeeling, selfish, irresponsible, parasitic criminals and elected officials who lie to their constituents, trade political favors for campaign contributions, turn a blind eye to the wishes of the electorate, cheat taxpayers out of hard-earned dollars, favor the corporate elite, entrench the military industrial complex, and spare little thought for the impact their thoughtless actions and hastily passed legislation might have on defenseless citizens.
Psychopaths and politicians both have a tendency to be selfish, callous, remorseless users of others, irresponsible, pathological liars, glib, con artists, lacking in remorse and shallow.
Charismatic politicians, like criminal psychopaths, exhibit a failure to accept responsibility for their actions, have a high sense of self-worth, are chronically unstable, have socially deviant lifestyle, need constant stimulation, have parasitic lifestyles and possess unrealistic goals.
It doesn’t matter whether you’re talking about Democrats or Republicans. [or Tories or Labour]
and
The willingness to prioritize power above all else, including the welfare of their fellow human beings, ruthlessness, callousness and an utter lack of conscience are among the defining traits of the sociopath.
When our own government no longer sees us as human beings with dignity and worth but as things to be manipulated, maneuvered, mined for data, manhandled by police, conned into believing it has our best interests at heart, mistreated, jailed if we dare step out of line, and then punished unjustly without remorse—all the while refusing to own up to its failings—we are no longer operating under a constitutional republic. [or a Parliamentary democracy]
Instead what we are experiencing is a pathocracy: tyranny at the hands of a psychopathic government, which “operates against the interests of its own people except for favoring certain groups.”
and
This much I know: we are not faceless numbers. We are not cogs in the machine. We are not slaves.
We are human beings, and for the moment, we have the opportunity to remain free—that is, if we tirelessly advocate for our rights and resist at every turn attempts by the government to place us in chains.
The Founders understood that our freedoms do not flow from the government. They were not given to us only to be taken away by the will of the State. They are inherently ours. In the same way, the government’s appointed purpose is not to threaten or undermine our freedoms, but to safeguard them.
Until we can get back to this way of thinking, until we can remind our fellow Americans what it really means to be a free American, and until we can learn to stand our ground in the face of threats to those freedoms and encourage our fellow citizens to stop being cogs in the machine, we will continue to be treated like slaves in thrall to a bureaucratic police state run by political psychopaths."

Both of the current US Presidential "candidates" are psychos too. See this:

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/oxford-trump-clinton-psychopathic/

So politicians exhibit the traits of psychos, who would have guessed?

Professional politicians, and political parties, are a big part the problem.
Both facilitate the rise of the political psycho.

A true Democracy requires politicians who are chosen from us, the people, and who, ideally, are not tied to political parties with their vested interests.


Consider the current democratic deficit that we face:

* The lack of real representation of the people in the political process
* Government by small party elites, for and on behalf of, the hidden money power elites
* The promotion of psychopaths to senior positions in our government, as above
* The practically unfettered use of corporate, union and private money to buy power and influence
* The self serving political parties that facilitate vested interests that exclude the common interest
* The warmongers, in both main political parties, that continually bomb, kill and destroy abroad
  Think Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and more, in this century alone
* The emasculation of localism
* The dumbing down of the education of the people
* The subservience to the USA via the so called "special relationship" with our Imperial masters
* The facilitation of powerful globalist institutions that are utterly remote from the people
   Think UN  and EU
* The facilitation of the invasive security surveillance state that continually spies on the people
* The centralisation and militarisation of civil policing 
   Police that, in practice, primarily serve the elites, and not the people

And much more. I have only scratched the surface in truth.

Do you remember any current "professional" politician talking about all these problems in any real depth? No I thought not.

How many of us would vote for all this? Only dumbasses surely.

But we were never asked were we?

So what we have got now is a pseudo-democracy.

It is clear to me that we desperately need government by the people, for the people

Because the so called "professional" politicians will never make the necessary changes to deliver real democracy. To expect that is utterly unrealistic. That would be like turkeys voting for christmas. It ain't gonna happen. Never has, and never will, under the present corrupt system. They do not even have the power to make any significant changes in truth. The real power is hidden in the shadows.

So, no matter what soothing words they spout when trying to persuade you to elect them, they never ever deliver. Remember Obomber and his "Hope and Change" rhetoric? All hot air as usual, just rhetoric, no action. The "progressive" Obomber turned out to be just as big a psycho as all the others, even bigger than some previous. He actually has a weekly "drone kill list" to enable him to directly select his personal victims! And he has being permanently delivering war for the US Empire. For every day of his 8 year "reign" then, the US has been at war somewhere. From this so called "progressive", Nobel Peace Prize winner, ffs.

"Progressive", "Hope and Change", merchants like Obummer have been spewed out of the system quite regularly during my lifetime, at least one a generation. Bliar was the notable fake prior to Obomber. They all have one common characteristic: They always disappoint, always. In fact they often turn into worse psychos than their predecessors. Just like Bliar and Obummer did.

Their main purpose seems to be to channel the, mainly youthful, opposition into the system, and down blind alleys. Thus diffusing the opposition slowly over a number of years while the realisation dawns that they are fake. Old timers like me are now far too long in the tooth to be taken in by these false hopes. [I admit that I voted for Bliar in 1997. But I soon recognised that he was a charlatan, and I have never voted since. Nor will I ever vote in this corrupt system again, see my summary at the end]

You can probably guess from the foregoing what I think about Jeremy Corbyn. With his latest version of "Hope and Change". I admit that he doesn't seem like a psycho. Then again they never do when they are looking for your votes.

Most old timers like me know, from bitter experience, that all politicians are professional liars. But, time and again, people get fooled into enthusiastic support for these psychos. This is most notable in the US, where the disconnect with reality from the core supporters is simply stunning. It just shows how effective the lying mainsteam media is I guess. Killary Clinton is "progressive", ffs. Do me a favour, she's a psycho like most of the others, actually worse than most of them,see above.



It depends on which academic you read, but it is clear that somewhere between 96 to 99% of ordinary people are not psychos. Psychos are a very small minority of the general population. But there is a much higher % among professional politicians, and those at the top of the corporate, bankster, military industrial, power structure. You will be able to verify this from numerous academic sources if you want.

The first democrats, in Greece, knew this and they structured their politics accordingly. Parliamentarians were drawn by lot, from the voters roll. If your name came out then you were obliged by law to take a sabbatical and serve for a year.

This ensured a Parliament that truly represented the people. Something that is notable by its complete absence today.

Of course I realise that a return to the ancient Greek democratic methods is not entirely feasible in the sophisticated modern world. We've got the internet though, which the Greeks certainly didn't have. We desperately need the involvement of ordinary people somehow or other. We've got plenty political scientists too, so it should surely not be beyond us.

Further, all corporate, and Trade Union, and private, money should be excluded from politics by law. The parliamentarians chosen from the people, by the people, however they are chosen, should receive an above average stipend for the duration of their term in office.


"Are you mad?" I hear you say. Maybe I am but, think about it all for a minute. Would this be worse than the stinking, rotten, corrupt, bought system that we've got now? I think not, it would be far better, far less corrupt. Because with less powerful partiesand hence no "leaders" we will have a truer Democracy.

Of course the "professional" party politicians, and their agents, those psychos that I've been talking about, will all tell you that they are absolutely essential. That only political "professionals", not us "amateurs", are qualified to exercise "power". A few moments of consideration and you will realise that this is pure, unadulterated, bullshit. "It's not rocket science" is the old expression.


Nothing that politicians do is complicated. Far from it, with good, apolitical and independent, civil servants, dispensing accurate data and advice, then you and I could do just as well as these corrupt scumbags who hang about Parliament getting pissed every day. [Most of them drink like fishes, as anyone who has seen them close up will confirm. I have seen this copious drinking of alcohol by the Westminster pols myself, in the 1990's. And nothing has changed, as was recently confirmed to me by my conversations with a current insider]


The one thing that national "professional" politicians do not want is local democracyLocalism is undermined by them at every opportunity, local government is now virtually moribund after their relentless centralising activities

The London/Westminster bubble rules. Even over all of our children's education, which should be nothing to do with politicians at allEven over all of our health care, which should be nothing to do with politicians at all.

Local democracy is one place that direct voting may be valid. Local people voting for locals.



The comment by John Whitehead, that I have linked, is of course about the US. Is it any different here in the UK? Yes it is.
The police state is not quite so advanced in the UK as it is in the US. Or at least it is not so blatant. We usually lag our US Imperial masters by a few years. Certainly that has been true in my lifetime. So given time.....
On the other hand, we have no Bill of Rights here to protect us from the government. So our freedom from government tyranny is not so clearly defined as it is in the US.

In the UK we are not citizens, we are all "subjects of the Crown", whatever that is.

The Crown Temple, in the City of London, with it's banksters, and it's Legalisms. This private "club" for the UK Establishment, and their power elite bosses, which is not even lawfully part of the UK at all.

These hidden elites who lord it over us via their:

* Utterly iniquitous, usurious, fiat-money system. Which facilitates finance monopoly capitalism, which is not real, free market, capitalism at all.

* Legal fiction person ie. strawman, and also corporate person, based Legalism that, in theory, is subservient to our Common/Natural/God's Law, but not in practice.

Do any of these elite criminals, or their overpaid placemen and banksters, go to jail for their crimes? Ever? Of course not, never. They control the money, and legal, systems that enslave us, the people.

Did anyone ever tell you how our money and legal systems actually operate at your state school? No I thought not. Despite their central importance to all our lives. Why do you think that was?

So most people don't even realise just how enslaved, by money and legalisms, that they are in reality. Most would rather not even think about it at all. All the modern trappings are available to distract them. The good life here is the West is of course entirely built on the lives of poor people, and poor countries, in other parts of the world. We've raped and pillaged the rest of the world for centuries in truth. This is an unpalatable truth for most people in the Western bubble. So they just keep watching the tell-lie-vision and try not to think about it.

I've tried to demonstrate the iniquities of the elites money and legal systems in previous posts:

Money creation here: http://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/the-money-creation-con.html
Legalism here: http://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/legalism-your-strawman-and-you.html

So yes, here in the UK it is "same same but different" to the US.

In conclusion then:

It is clear to me that all the UK political psychos, be they:

* fascists,
* liberals,
* socialists,
* communists,
* any other -ist or -ism that you care to name,
* any political party that you care to name,

it is clear that they all want to rule over us via their own elites.

This is their common ground and, in practice, this is exactly what they do.

In practice they all support government by elites

In practice they all kowtow to the hidden, money power, elites

So how do they represent us, the people?


They clearly don't.

In reality they represent the hidden, money power, elites.

And it will never change unless there is government by the people, for the people.


Pigs might fly......



Finally a summary:

Radical democratic reform is essential here in the UK.

Because our current political system is a pseudo-democracy with many fundamental flaws.

So we need to push the psychos out of all our lives as soon as we can, before it's too late.

We need to reject them all.

And we will never achieve that by voting for them in this corrupted pseudo-democracy.

By voting for them then, we give them our consent to carry on with their psychopathic ways.

You might want to do that. I certainly don't.

And I won't. I deny them my consent.

Sources:
http://rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/from_democracy_to_pathocracy_the_rise_of_the_political_psychopath

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/oxford-trump-clinton-psychopathic/


Postscript

Some thoughts about opposing the system

This site has numerous practical solutions about how you can live outside the system. There is a massive archive that you can access via the search function:

https://www.corbettreport.com/

Finally, if you read my earlier post, "A view from the bottom of the rabbit hole":

http://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/a-view-from-bottom-of-rabbit-hole.html

then you will know something about the thought provoking work of Miles Mathis. Item 2 in that post pointed you at his work about "faux leftists" like Naomi Klein, Naomi Wolfe and Noam Chomsky:

http://mileswmathis.com/naomi.pdf

and the end of his post he gives some very good advice about personal opposition to the system:

"As another example, we can return to 911, the mainstream story of which is disbelieved by a majority or large minority. Has the government felt the need to respond in any positive way? Nope. The only way they respond is again by slandering the tens of millions of people in this country who know the story is hogwash. They can ignore opinion and undirected protest indefinitely.

They don't care what you think, as long as you keep buying and banking and credit carding and taking loans and paying taxes and fees and going to movies and watching TV and eating garbage food and taking drugs and buying guns and hanging yellow ribbons and voting for their scarecrows.

Which of course means that the only protest that is meaningful is a widespread boycott of the entire system. You have to stop doing all or most of those things, and a large number of other people have to do the same thing.

........Things may get marginally better in the next decade. Society may be transported back to the 1950s or 1970s in many ways. However, although you may have been more blissfully ignorant back then, you were still living in the MATRIX. If society as a whole wishes to escape from the MATRIX, it must do what I said above, changing itself person by person.

But you don't have to wait for that. Since the change is person by person, and you are one person, you can change without waiting for the rest. After the change, you will have the tall inconvenience of living in a society where you don't fit, but if you are like me, that may not require a new suit of clothes."



Incidentally this article has a very interesting short look at the history of the British Labour Party, via the bios of some of it's founding fathers and mothers. Like Sidney, and Beatrice Webb, nee Potter. [Yes Beatrice Potter]. It will not be comfortable reading for Labourites. 

Miles posits that the whole purpose of the Labour Party has been to, as I put it earlier in this post:

"....channel the, mainly youthful, opposition into the system, and down blind alleys. Thus diffusing the opposition slowly over a number of years while the realisation dawns that they are fake".

He puts it rather differently, but he effectively says the same thing about the Labour Party in toto that I was saying about the "Hope and Change" merchants earlier. And it is difficult to argue with his point too.

* Labour has had no impact on the democratic deficit that I talked about earlier

* Labour's Bank of England reforms are a fraud, as Miles demonstrates

* Labour has made no attempt to reform the City of London with its enslaving Legalisms

* Labour has added restrictive Legalisms at the same rate as the Tories have

* Labour introduced the "Comprehensive Education" which has led to the disastrous dumbing down that I showed in my earlier education post

* Labourites will talk about the NHS. But that reform was from a Liberal, Lord Beveridge

* Labour has instigated the recent illegal foreign wars when in power [Serbia, Iraq etc], and fully supported them when in opposition [Libya, Syria etc]

* Labour has not curbed the power of the oligarchs and plutocrats, those hidden elites

* Labour has not curbed the power of the media moguls

* Labour has not curbed the power of the Military Industrial Complex

I could go on, and on, and on.....


http://mileswmathis.com/naomi.pdf