Celebrating War, today is Armistice Day

 Armistice Day 11^th November 2021

11^th hour of the 11^th day of the11^th month – 33, the Masonic number, Bingo!

I went to a football match in Liverpool last weekend, Everton v Spurs at Goodison Park, Liverpool 4. No masks, no distancing, no covid checks, full pubs, a full stadium. Covid, wtf is that? Anyhow, it was the nearest home match to Armistice Day and, as is usual nowadays then, there was a minutes silence followed by the last post before the game. Not a person moved or spoke during the whole time, it was respected 100%, and it got me thinking about my youth and how different things were then……

My father went to war on 6^th June 1944, he drove a truck onto Sword beach in Normandy on D day. Sword beach was primarily Canadians and the losses suffered there were light compared with other beaches. He was a signals operator and he subsequently drove his truck into France loaded with electronic stuff, plus his tent and personal stuff. Over the next year then, he followed the war front through northern France and Belgium and on into Germany. The war stopped over winter and he camped near Holland for the winter months whilst the Dutch were starving. No supplies were provided by the German occupiers to the Dutch. Many years later he met a Dutch couple in Normandy, at the 50^th anniversary of the D day landings, 1994. His only ever attendance at any such event. The Dutchman told him that they were so hungry that winter that they killed and ate their pet dog.

On the way, dad visited Hamburg in Germany which he said was “a pile of rubble” and had a distinctive “smell of death”, a smell that he had experienced once or twice before in that year. He ended up on Luneberg Heath where the Armistice was signed and he also visited Belsen concentration camp which shocked him to the core. He was unable to articulate anything about that place, the tears welled up in his eyes and his throat dried up, even 50 years later….

Dad was 24 when he returned home in 1946. He had “signed up” in 1940 as soon as he was 18. He tried to sign in 1939 but his mother told the recruiters that he was only 17, so he had to wait a year. After the war he became a Waterguard Officer, a Customs Officer in modern parlance. In the port of Liverpool which was still a vibrant port in those days, with ships from all over the world. No containers, tens of thousands of “dockers” who loaded and unloaded all the ships manually. He had an interesting and very varied job with no clocking on or off, the port was busy 24/7 depending on the tide. I was born in 1950 and my bro in 1951, 13 months later. After the shock of my bro then, they worked out what was causing it, and the family was complete…..

As I said, my experience last weekend got me to thinking, and I remembered the advice of my old dad. Advice that my bro and I received early in life. He said something along these lines:

“Son, never wave a flag, never wear a poppy, never believe the misty eyed romantics who want to march and glorify war on the official day, 11^th November. War is evil and should never be celebrated. Most of the flag wavers don’t know what war is either, they were mainly well away from the action. They haven’t got a damn clue. Don’t ever listen to them”

My old man was a man of his word. He lived up to his own advice. He led by example and that was enough for my bro and I. We loved to play at war with homemade toys, all boys of our generation did, but we followed his advice, we never respected the official BS, ever. Later, when I was a man, I once asked my old man, what happened to your WW2 medals dad? He replied “you played with them as a toddler, they were lost when we moved house in 1954”. I didn’t need to ask him why that was, I already knew what he thought about war, he was not proud about any of it. And I think that many youngsters in the 1950’s received similar advice.

When I first started going to soccer games at Goodison Park in 1960 [I’m 61 years a fan of the blues!] then I don’t remember any matches in November that celebrated war like they do now [I could well be wrong about that, I imagine that there were military bands and ceremonies]. Certainly the participants mainly wanted to forget not remember. Liverpool had been bombed flat during the blitz, and there were still whole chunks of the city centre that were just wasteland. “Bomb sites” we called them, still with bricks and rubble that had been bulldozed flat in the 1940's; they made handy car parks in the 1960’s. So Liverpudlians had reminders of war every single day of their lives, they had no need for flag wavers or rich men's ceremonies. It was a poor city, the country was broke and the bomb sites weren’t all finally renovated until well into the ‘60’s

To illustrate the level of poverty in Liverpool during the 1960's here is a small personal anecdote. I learned to swim in the public baths at Queens Drive, Walton, Liverpool, very near Everton's football stadium. My home in Lydiate, Lancashire was 7 miles away, outside the city in rural farmland, an easy bus ride for a 12 year old. In those days the changing rooms at the Victorian pool were individual cubicles and you simply left your clothes on a hook in the cubicle and went into the pool. The cubicle was yours for the duration of your swim. There were no locks on the outside door, none of us had anything worth stealing, or so we thought. On one occasion my bro and I went to our swimming club at the baths and had a good training session there. When we came back to our cubicles my bro found that somebody had stolen his underpants whilst we were in the pool! The thief had left his own underpants in exchange and we were both shocked to see that they were like a grey thin rag, hardly underpants at all. The owner was so poor that he didn't own any proper underpants. We felt rich in comparison, we had a few pairs of clean white cotton ones at home. Needless to say my bro returned home with no underpants that day.

Liverpool was a tough place in those days. Tough folk, living in a tough city, with tough kids who took no prisoners. If you showed any weakness as a kid then you became a victim. My bro and I had season tickets for the "boys pen" at Goodison Park, literally a fenced enclosure at the back of the main terrace on the Gladwys Street end. It was for 16 years old and below only, in theory anyhow; it was half the price of entry for the adult sections. Needless to say that, in such a poor city, there were plenty in the pen who looked over 16, well over. It was a tough place for a ten year old, but we were both big, well fed, country lads. We could bluff out our toughness, we looked the part compared with the thin, wiry, under nourished, snot-nosed urchins all around us.

Happy days, we saw the blues win the Premier League title from there in 1962/3. We saw 20 of the 21 league games at Goodison that season and we even got on the pitch after the final game which clinched the title, beating Fulham 4-1 on the final day of the season. At three quarters time they always opened all the gates so anyone wanting to leave could exit the stadium. So we always left the pen at that point and went into an adult section, usually the Lower Bullens terrace. It was great to be with the adults. Foul mouthed, tough Liverpudlians who were generally very funny and happy, they were always cracking jokes and in a crowd of sixty odd thousand, or more, then the atmosphere was mainly great. We had a good team after all, so the games were usually good fun. But if the opponent didn't play fair then the atmosphere could turn nasty quite quickly. The pitch was like a bear pit for opponents in matches like that

Finally, going back to my Armistice theme, by the time I became an adult in the late ‘60’s then, everything had changed. Respect for convention was not our bag, the opposite we rejected all the old BS. So much so that by the 1970’s then, if they tried to have a minutes silence and wave flags at a game in November then, the silence was immediately broken by chants and derision from the younger element. God Save the Queen? Fuck off we’re having none of that shite. Up the Blues! They gave up and stopped trying for many years. It’s only now that the BS propaganda is off the scale, and all the old guys who knew the truth have gone, that they can get away with it…..

Covid 1984 - Lockdown

The real reasons for Lockdown

[Thanks to Alexander Page – Shape Your Nature]

~ Destroy small and medium sized independent businesses, in order to strengthen corporate power, increase private ownership and ultimately widen the gap between the rich and poor and also eliminate the middle class

~ Shift the retail landscape predominantly online in order to increase the monopoly of major online retailers (like Amazon) whilst destroying independent retail outlets. The ‘convenience’ of online shopping from the comfort of the home means people will be less likely to pay attention to (or object to) the closure of local/high street shops/services

~ Destroy jobs, thereby making people reliant upon government handouts. Dish out stimulus checks/furloughs/grants, to give the illusion of government ‘support’, in an effort to increase trust of the state, and present the state as benevolent with good intentions

~ Drive larger numbers of people into poverty, who then become dependent upon Universal Basic Income for their survival. Hand this out without conditions at first (in order to create reliance and complacency) but then require social compliance (proof of medical poisoning etc.) to maintain future pay-outs

~ Have an excuse to inject huge amounts of money into the economy (through furloughs, stimulus checks, business bail outs etc), paving the way for unprecedented hyper-inflation which will inevitably render the global reserve currency (the dollar) worthless. Use this as an excuse to restructure entire economies with a Central Bank Digital Currency, which will be fully controlled, regulated and monitored, and very likely a stepping stone towards a global one world digital currency

~ Destroy community: pubs, coffee shops, cafes, restaurants, sports clubs/matches, leisure/recreational facilities, cinema, shopping centres and churches are at the heart of community culture and places in which people commune, enjoy themselves and ultimately express their freedom

~ Limit forms of leisure that are not digital, thereby diminishing face-to-face communication, destroying community and limiting active forms of entertainment

~ Have people working from home in order to limit direct social interaction and have people feel ‘grateful’ upon their eventual return to office slavery

~ Increase feelings of isolation so that people feel less connected and less unified with their fellow human beings

~ Limit mass gatherings/rebellion against draconian measures

~ Limit religious worship and communion, as part of the agenda to destroy spirituality and further the new religion of scientism

~ Keep people in front of the TV and video games out of boredom, thereby creating a more passive, lazy and dumbed down population. Use this opportunity to broadcast state sponsored propaganda, in order to perpetuate the mainstream narrative and keep people indoctrinated/fearful (and thus more easily controllable)

~ Get people increasingly addicted to streaming platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime and Disney plus. Use this as an opportunity to mind control the masses with subliminal messaging and predictive programming

~ Increasingly digitize customer services, moving from personal/human interactions towards impersonal/robotic web chat services

~ Limit face-to-face communication and move us increasingly towards digital communication (Zoom, social media etc.)

~ Increase the addiction and reliance on digital platforms. Use mainstream media and celebrity endorsement to promote social media platforms like Tiktok, keeping people distracted and making house arrest more palatable

~ Foster a more sedentary lifestyle, where people become passive, lazy and weak and less able to stand up for themselves and their rights

~ Limit sunlight, fresh air and exercise, thereby creating a more sick population reliant upon the medical establishment and further lining the pockets of the pharmaceutical industry

~ Target the elderly who are seen as ‘expendable’ and a drain on resources/finances. Keep them locked up, leading to ill health (and death) and ostracizing them from society and their family members (leading to further death)

~ Increase police power and presence, paving the way for an Orwellian police state, which creates tension between the public and the authorities. Use this as an excuse to take away more freedoms and rights, in the name of ‘safety and security’

~ Install increasing amounts of surveillance cameras in cities, paving the way for total Big Brother monitoring of populations, under the guise of ‘safety’. The aim is to move us towards the Chinese model, where almost every action and move is monitored and recorded

~ Install harmful fifth generation cell phone towers/lamppost antennas unnoticed and unchallenged. To provide the network for the Internet of Things [IoT] and the Internet of Bodies [IoB] to implement Orwellian Bio-surveillance under the guise of health

~ Restructure the urban landscape to become more systemized, robotic and impersonal (one-way systems, glass shields etc.), thereby facilitating a move towards a more disconnected and synthetic society

~ Claim that lockdowns have helped to facilitate an improvement in greenhouse gas emissions, giving the excuse for further removal of freedoms, all in the name of ‘saving the planet’

~ Normalize the reduction in passenger airline travel, in preparation for the planned reduction (and potential elimination) of passenger flights (justified on the basis of meeting the 2050 goal of ‘absolute zero’ emissions)

~ Break the human spirit to such an extent that people willingly queue up to receive untested and unapproved medical procedures, on the ‘promise’ of a return to ‘normality’

~ Test the waters for obedience. See how many people willingly place themselves under house arrest and who are therefore at the mercy of government control

Oh, and one other thing,

~ Try and delay the spread of a relatively benign virus that 99.8% of those that contract it recover successfully and that has a higher average age of mortality than normal 

Covid assumptions

 Covid1984

Update

1^st February 2021

In early 2020 the worlds governments told their citizens that there was a new virus at large [Coronavirus SARS – CoV – 2]

and that this virus caused a new flu like illness [Covid19]

Further, they told us that they had a way of detecting that this new virus was infecting a person, using an old test called a Polymerase Chain Reaction test [PCR]

Also that there were lots of people in all our populations, who show no symptoms and are not ill, but have tested positive for Covid19 using the PCR test. Further, that such people can infect other healthy people who are not ill with the new virus. They labelled such infected, but not ill, folk as: Asymptomatic Carriers

Finally, they told us that all this means that there was now a new Pandemic and that it was rapidly spreading around the planet and that we should all be scared stiff

So these in red above are 5 key foundational assumptions for their Covid19 narrative.

I call them foundational because, if any one of these assumptions fails then,

the whole Covid19 narrative fails

This short paper will examine the evidence for these foundational assumptions in turn:

1 Coronavirus SARS – CoV – 2

What is the evidence for the existence of the new virus?

Succinctly: there isn’t any at all!

First see here:

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/

“Buried deep in the document, on page 39 [actually page 42], in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…” The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available… Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE”

So the US Centre for Disease Control admits that there is no isolated virus!

Second, during the “pandemic” there have been numerous Freedom of Information Requests to government and health authorities all over the world. Not one of these bodies has ever provided a document that proves that the virus has ever been isolated, not one. See this:

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

“FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever”

Third, more FOI info here:

https://peopleforjusticecanada.com/2021/01/05/canadian-public-health-officials-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-performed-anywhere-ever/

What is isolation?

http://www.drug-dissolution-testing.com/?p=3613)

"A virus isolate is a virus isolated from an infected host. The process is called "isolation," which separates viruses from the hosts." It means that for microbiologists and virologists, taking a swab sample, which separates virus from the host, is considered as "virus isolation." This interpretation does not reflect the correct meaning and understanding of the subject of isolation. But, they imply and promote the true meaning of the process of isolation, i.e., to obtain something by extraction, purification, and identification, reflected by well-known pretty pictures of the DNA/RNA, proteins, and viruses such as a spherical body with spikes (aka coronavirus). The virologists' version of the definition is incorrect and causing the problem. Wherever one looks for the virus, one always finds a suffix with it, e.g., "virus isolate," "virus culture," "virus lysate," etc., (which are soups, mixtures or gunks), never "virus" alone; however, it is presented and promoted as pure "virus."

So nobody has any empirical evidence anywhere that the virus actually exists!

In fact, starting with the Chinese who first identified the virus DNA sequence, they all rely entirely on “computer models” to enumerate the virus DNA strand, not isolated virii

See here:

https://www.sott.net/article/443103-Only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-SARS-CoV-2-virus

“First, in the section titled "Whole Genome Sequencing," we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.

To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic make up to compare their samples with the actual unicorn's hair, hooves and horn”

Computer models are NOT empirical evidence, particularly not unicorn computer models

Assumption 1 fails

2 Covid19

What is the evidence that the new virus actually causes Covid19?

Hard to credit given all the media hype and scaremongering but: there isn’t any!

All you need to do is think for yourself to see the truth because, if you do then, you will soon realise that:

If there has been no isolated virus then, there can be no proof that it causes any illness QED

For further confirmation then see here. Kochs Postulates have not been satisfied:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/

“About 150 years ago, scientists painstakingly constructed a set of principles that can prove whether a particular microbe is the cause of a specific disease or is just a bystander. Those three principles are known as the Koch postulates.

From all the available information, the novel coronavirus doesn’t appear to meet any of these tenets, never mind all three.

Like most human endeavours, the Koch postulates were the product of collaboration. First, Jakob Henle developed the underlying concepts, and then Robert Koch and Friedrich Loeffler spent decades refining them until they were published in 1890. The resulting three postulates are:

1. The pathogen occurs in every case of the disease in question and under circumstances that can account for the pathological changes and clinical course of the disease.

2. The causative microorganism occurs in no other disease as a fortuitous and nonpathogenic parasite.

3. After being fully isolated from the body and grown in tissue culture (or cloned), it can induce the disease anew.

…..

There’s an urgent need for scientists to step up and do this conclusively with the novel coronavirus and COVID-19. But, strangely, the fire hose of scientific papers on the virus-disease dyad is only a sickly trickle on this tremendously important aspect of it.

A very straightforward and inexpensive experiment is all that’s needed to prove that the first postulate has been met.

…..

But such an experiment has never been done, or if it has been done it hasn’t been made public.

The real kicker, though, is that the third postulate – isolating and sequencing the virus and then showing it causes the disease in other organisms – has not been fulfilled either”

No proof has been publicised anywhere that Coronavirus SARS – CoV – 2 causes Covid19

Do you really think that they wouldn’t have shown us if they had any proof?

Assumption 2 fails

3 PCR test

What is the evidence that the PCR test can reliably identify that a person is infected with the new virus?

Let’s start with the obvious:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction

“PCR amplifies a specific region of a DNA strand (the DNA target)”

So not a whole virus then. Not a good start….

But let’s get straight to the heart of the matter. The PCR test was invented by a US medical scientist called Kary Mullis who, in 1993, won 997a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his invention. Here is what Mr Mullis had to say about his test in July :

“PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with [like Covid19] was going to hurt you or anything like that“

What more is there to say? See the video of Kary Mullis saying that here:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/05/pcr-inventor-it-doesnt-tell-you-that-you-are-sick/

This article is worth reading more fully because it raises a whole load more questions about the suitability of PCR for diagnosis, the number of amplifications for instance.

More on PCR [and also relevant to assumptions 1 and 2 above]:

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/12/03/ten-fatal-errors-scientists-attack-paper-that-established-global-pcr-driven-lockdown/

“Titled “External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-Cov-2 Reveals 10 Major Flaws At The Molecular and Methodological Level: Consequences For False-Positive Results,” the paper’s lead author is Dr. Pieter Borger, an expert on the molecular biology of gene expression. Several other esteemed names are associated with the paper including Dr. Michael Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer and outspoken critic of much of the so-called science beneath the WHO’s global lockdown, masking, and school shut-down measures. ”

Finally, this is now admitted by the WHO itself:

https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05

“Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis”

As an aid, so not a diagnostic test then….

In summary using the PCR test to identify a “case” is close to meaningless

It is not empirical evidence of anything

Just think of all those “positive” people who do not get ill but simply return to their normal life after their isolation period ends

Assumption 3 fails

4 Asymptomatic Carriers

What is the evidence for the existence of asymptomatic carriers?

What does your common sense tell you?

Yes, you are correct, there isn’t any:

See this paper in "Nature”. Following the lockdown, the city government of Wuhan conducted a city-wide nucleic acid screening for SARS-CoV-2.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

It was carried out on an impressive scale:

There were 10,652,513 eligible people aged ≥6 years in Wuhan (94.1% of the total population). The nucleic acid screening was completed in 19 days (from May 14th, 2020 to Jun 1st, 2020), and tested a total of 9,899,828 persons from the 10,652,513 eligible people (participation rate, 92.9%). Of the 9899,828 participants, 9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19, and 34,424 were recovered COVID-19 patients.

The detection rate of asymptomatic positive cases was very low, and there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts. There were no asymptomatic positive cases in 96.4% of the residential communities.

Previous studies have shown that asymptomatic individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus were infectious, and might subsequently become symptomatic. Compared with symptomatic patients, asymptomatic infected persons generally have low quantity of viral loads and a short duration of viral shedding, which decrease the transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2. In the present study, virus culture was carried out on samples from asymptomatic positive cases, and found no viable SARS-CoV-2 virus. All close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases tested negative, indicating that the asymptomatic positive cases detected in this study were unlikely to be infectious.”

This from a study of 9 million Chinese citizens

Assumption 4 fails

5 Pandemic

What is the evidence that we have actually experienced a Pandemic in the last 12 months?

Let’s start with the WHO, the World Health Organisation.

WHO changed it’s definition of Pandemic in 2009 in response to the Swine Flu which they also wanted to label a Pandemic.

This is what they used to say, but deleted in 2009:

“A pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears …resulting in epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness……”

Here is what they now say:

“A disease epidemic occurs when there are more cases of that disease than normal.”

See what they did there? They went from “enormous numbers of deaths” to “more cases...than normal”.

[I hold a pdf of both the before and after definitions on my pc. You can easily verify this yourself with a quick Google search]

[By the way, Swine Flu caused only 18,449 lab confirmed deaths in 2009, see Wikipedia. This out of a world population in 2009 of 6.8 billion. There were 481k lab confirmed cases]

But the clincher is the all death mortality per capita from the Office for National Statistics, ONS, see the graph below. I was born in 1950 and for most of my life I have lived with a greater risk of death than I did in 2020. For 53 of my 70 years my risk of death has been HIGHER than it was in 2020.

Enormous numbers of deaths and illness? No wonder they changed the definition because under the old definition 2020 did not show a pandemic, it was simply a bad flu season and we experience a bad flu season every few years

This pattern has been duplicated across the world. In the US there was no increase at all in all cause mortality per capita for 2020

Pandemic? What Pandemic

Assumption 5 fails

Conclusions:

Covid1984 [surely the more appropriate name?] is clearly a house built on sand.

As I said at the start then, if any one of their founding assumptions fail then,

their whole narrative fails

And all these founding assumptions do fail as I have demonstrated.

There is no empirical evidence for any one of them, so all are unproven

Over to you, what are YOU going to do about it?

Come on folks – wake up and smell the coffee

It is up to us, all of us, because:

This ends when we all say NO