What! You still believe the official 9/11 story! Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Really? Even though there is so much evidence that it is utterly false.
You took the blue pill? Ok that explains it.
Here's a red pill. Use your brain.
Swallow it down now. There's a good sheeple.
What is shown in this gif violates Newton’s Third Law of motion. Therefore, it cannot have happened. It is fakery. The brain has to rule, the eyes have to take a back seat. It can be no other way.
Thanks Mark Tokarski, blog owner at:
"Third law: When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion
"The direct evidence that the 9/11 planes were computer images can be summarized as follows: many instances of provably manipulated audio and video footage, a total absence of plane deceleration and normal crash physics in video footage of alleged plane impacts, the lack of wake vortices at any of the crash sites, the several indications of evidence-planting of plane parts around the towers, the preponderance of filmmakers and CGI specialists among ‘amateur’ camcorder videographers, the non-listing and apparent non-existence of the WTC flights in flight record databases, and, perhaps above all, the simple, abstractly verifiable impossibility that a 2mm thick aluminum fuselage shell could slice through a much stronger outer and inner steel columns that were respectively 19x and 60x thicker than it. After a discussion of the physical evidence, large amounts of circumstantial evidence (the, e.g. the motivations for or ‘the why’ of plane fakery) will be gone over in later sections. Also addressed will be ‘the why’ of faking the planes, as well as common questions around the thesis, such as ‘what happened to the flights?’ While it is not essential to answer these questions in order to conclude there were no hijackers or Boeing 767 jetliners involved, doing so may increase one’s comfort with that position."
and
"Much of what follows is written for relatively ‘advanced’ researchers who are already 100% certain the event was a conspiracy not carried out by Muslim terrorists, but have not been able to fully come to terms with the fact that no passenger planes were used. The goal here with respect to the uninitiated reader is to normalize the idea that the media-intelligence complex that runs this country did work together to fake the planes and hijackers, and is not above wholly faking other things (events of all kinds, identities and their deaths, etc.) that are presented to us as real. For a ‘crash course’ on this subject that requires less time and attention than the information here, I recommend starting out with the tightly censored film 911 Taboo, and continuing on with this post as time allows."
and
"Before going into the evidence, the most important thing is to lay out what this post does and does not claim to prove. So much of 9/11 research has been about asking questions, or pointing to hundreds of coincidences around the event that, while overwhelmingly indicative of a conspiracy, to the point of incalculably high, million- or billions-to-one odds, do not technically prove one, and are unwieldy for the layman (i.e., someone who cannot or doesn’t wish to spend a lot of time studying 9/11) to examine and ‘process’ all at once. This post, on the other hand, presents scientific evidence and audio and visual comparisons that by themselves make certain things about 9/11 clear beyond any reasonable doubt, to take the reader from A to B, instead of just undermining A.
We can firmly conclude the following from the evidence that will be presented:
1) The Twin Towers and WTC 7 were destroyed on 9/11 and many first responders and building occupants did die in the event. There was an explosion in part of the Pentagon and some of its employees probably died. A small pit with tiny pieces of metal debris in it was found in Shanksville PA farm field after nearby reports of strange noises and a small, low-flying aircraft.
2) No passenger jetliners hit the Twin Towers or the Pentagon in the manner depicted, likely not at all, therefore no passengers or hijackers died there in the way that was alleged. Further, the passengers and hijackers who we were told were on Flight 93 did not die either in the manner alleged, if at all, and the ‘Let’s Roll’ storyline was a fiction.
3) It was known before 9/11 that some of the supposed passenger victims of Flight 93 would be said to have died in the attacks. Further, some of the supposed passengers from all four planes made phone calls that were impossible to make from cruise altitude, and lied to family members that they were being hijacked in the air. A large majority of the alleged victims do not appear in public records or the Social Security Death Index. Therefore, some of the passenger deaths were faked, at least in the manner represented, i.e. if they did die, it was not at the hands of hijackers. If some of the passenger identities and deaths were fake, it is thus likely that all of them were fake.
4) Many of the plane impact videos we were shown on and after 9/11, including the most widely circulated news footage and amateur videos, are fake, meaning they were altered and a CGI plane was inserted into the footage, therefore all videos of plane impact are probably fake, even when doctoring cannot be proven in a specific piece of footage (e.g. due to the area of impact not being viewable).
5) People who had access to many miniature nuclear weapons or other unknown weaponry destroyed the towers, and people with close ties to the media deceived the public, both facts of which eliminate ragtag Muslim terrorists from consideration. Narrowing the pool of suspects down further requires examining available evidence and applying the principles of means, motive, and opportunity. Based on this criteria the Israeli intelligence agents who were arrested in New York are worthy of the most attention as suspects in both the destruction of the towers and recording of footage of the event that was used to create the fake, anonymous video that were aired later.
6) At least a few dozen people inside the Associated Press and all the major news networks, probably including some or all of their leadership, knew that a deception was being carried out and variously either allowed it to happen or actively perpetrated it themselves.
7) Some extremely high-level members of the federal government knew what was happening and helped prevent the true perpetrators from being investigated and the truth from coming out."
and
"The evidence does not explain:
1) What, if anything, hit the towers and Pentagon and exactly what methods of deception were used on the ground to fool bystanders into thinking they saw something they didn’t, such as planting agents on the ground to spread rumors of a passenger plane and falsely testify as to having seen one, or make phone calls into news networks to say they had seen a plane.
2) While it is not in the scope of this article, what exactly destroyed the towers, whether mini-nukes or a more advanced method like a directed energy weapon, or both, as well as a third failsafe, conventional explosives combined with nanothermite; an event that was planned at least 25 years in advance would surely have at least one backup method of destruction in case of a failure, and it’s my belief that all three were used. No single demolition cause thesis can explain all of the phenomena observed and incontrovertible evidence exists for three distinct methods of demolition being used.
3) Which and how many people were involved in the destruction of the buildings and faking of the videos, though ample probable cause exists to investigate certain suspects.
4) What happened to the ‘hijackers,’ meaning the handful of Saudis who are known to have gone to flight school and lived in Florida briefly, as well as the others, if they exist.
5) What happened to the planes, pilots, and passengers of flights 11, 175, 77, and 93 (i.e. those that we know did exist, e.g. David Angell, as opposed to the majority whose identities were fabricated altogether)
6) Whether the supposed plane in Shanksville did not exist at all, was a drone or missile, was a different, unhijacked plane that was shot down, or was real and disposed of in some other way, with a small number of real passengers on the severely underbooked flight having died and alleged passengers such as Daniel Lewin created so that the flight could play the needed part in the operation’s narrative, with the evidence strongly pointing towards a drone or missile being fired into the ground."
Hopefully you are starting to get the picture now.
You thought that you saw a plane.
But that was only an image on a tv screen.
It was not real because nothing on a tv screen ever is real.
A plane could not have done what you saw; it is physically impossible.
The full case is detailed here:
http://www.pats-blog.com/the-case-for-no-planes/You thought that you saw a plane.
But that was only an image on a tv screen.
It was not real because nothing on a tv screen ever is real.
A plane could not have done what you saw; it is physically impossible.
The full case is detailed here:
Is that red pill working yet?
Here is another analysis which draws different conclusions but which also makes a strong case for no real planes:
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=244&part=1
Finally think about this:
If they could fake 9/11 then, what else could they fake?
Answer:
Anything they like.
And they do fake stuff all the time.
Zappa knew in 1973:
No comments:
Post a Comment