A giffers lament for the lost freedoms of children

or

Once, when we were young, we were free

When we were kids we were physically stronger than kids are now. We were physically fitter too. We were tougher. We had to be to get by.

When we were kids, if we became sick, we recovered naturally and without drugs.

When we were kids we all contracted measles, mumps, rubella and chicken pox, and we recovered naturally and without drugs.

When we were kids we hadn't been vaccinated 30 times before we were 6 months old.

When we were kids there were no childhood “conditions” like ADHD or bipolar, and we certainly didn’t take any brain drugs.

When we were kids the idea of us going to a psychiatrist would have been absurd.

When we were kids we didn’t ask for any protection and we weren’t given much, and we survived.


School wasn’t some kind of social laboratory or baby-sitting service. We were there to learn, and if we paid attention, we did.

Sex was a private issue. We were taught about that at home or by friends or not at all. We certainly didn’t learn about it in school. That would have been ridiculous.

We learned not to interfere in other peoples business, to mind our own business. To live and let live.


We had a tiny amount of pocket money from our parents.

We earned some money for ourselves by delivering newspapers, or picking crops for the farmer in summer.

So we treated our possessions with care because we knew the cost/value.

If something was broken then, if possible, we fixed it.

We never threw things away, unless they were completely worn out or unable to be fixed.

We had very few "toys". And what we did have was usually home made and treasured.

When we played games, adults weren’t hovering or coaching every move we made.

We found places to play on our own away from adults, and we figured it all out.

We refereed ourselves. There were no adults involved. The whole group voiced its opinion, the older, more experienced, kids voices counted for more. And the decision was reached by agreement, usually.

We very rarely came to blows over the game because that would spoil, or even end, the game. Which none of us wanted.

There were winners and losers. There were no plastic trophies. We played one game, then another. We lost, we won. We competed.

We always wanted to win but losing wasn’t a problem, usually.

People were who they were. They had lives and personalities. They had eccentricities that everyone accepted, usually.

We never thought about "diversity" even though in many ways there was far more real diversity then. Because there was no pressure to conform to any "standard" like there is now.

There was no "Health and Safety" to make us all conform either. People were free to be themselves. To take their own risks and to bear the consequences.

We wanted to be apart from adults and we mainly were.

Adults wanted to be apart from us too. We were sometimes told to "go out and play". So we did.

So we took our own risks using our own judgement. We used our common sense and sometimes we misjudged, but we always accepted the consequences.

We were rarely hurt, but if we were then we learned our lesson.


Our parents didn't consult us about what we wanted to eat. We were given our food and we ate it, or we went hungry.

Most of us ate everything that we were given.

We never threw food away, that would have been seen as stupid.

Most of what we ate was fresh, and prepared at home.

We didn't have junk food, it barely existed.

We didn't have any "snacks" only meals which we always ate as a family.

There were hardly any fat kids, or adults.

Our parents didn’t usually consult us about what we "wanted".

We weren’t part of the decision-making process.

They didn’t need us for that. We didn't care either.

We just wanted to be left alone by adults and, mostly, we were.

We were usually with other kids and we felt safe as a result.

If you wanted a spot to be alone, you found one for yourself, and you still felt safe.

No one asked us about our feelings. If they had, we would have been confused. Feelings? What’s that?

We were alive. We knew it. We didn’t need anything else.

Kids didn’t display their possessions like signs of their identity. A kid who did was ignored, even shunned.

We had few clothes, our "best" and our "playing out", plus some spares.

Here is my bro with me in the middle and our little friend David on the right. We are wearing our "playing out" clothes. Notice the heavily tanned knees; we were always outdoors.

David had toys that his, mostly absent, father bought for him to try and buy his affection.

Our father was strict with us, but he loved us, and we knew it. He was always there but he didn't buy us toys or sweets.

We knew who was the better off. We felt sorry for David.

Kids never acted like little adults. We didn’t dress like little adults. We didn’t want to be like adults.

We could spot liars a mile away. We could spot phonies from across town.

We knew who the really crazy adults were, and we stayed away from them.

We didn’t need gadgets and machines to be happy. We only needed a place to play away from adults.

When we were kids we were independent and we were mostly unsupervised.

When we were kids we had no television to tell us what to think or to mesmerize us. So we used our imaginations which were vivid.

When we were kids we thought for ourselves and worked it out for ourselves. We schemed and we planned for ourselves. We didn't need adults to do that for us.

When we were kids the number of friends we had didn’t matter. We didn’t keep count. That would have been recognized immediately as a form of insanity.

When we were kids we lived in an analogue world, and most people were much more connected to nature then. We spent most of our time outdoors when not at school.

When we were kids we lived in a do-it-yourself world, and most people were much more self reliant then. We didn't receive "support". We had to do it for ourselves, so we did.

We were alive.

We were happy.

We were free.

That was enough.

It still is.

Children's bonus feature. The real Queens speech for Xmas 2015:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDO1JfZ3aRI


Inspirational source:
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/12/24/once-when-we-were-free-2/

How big oil conquered the world

Or

The history of the oil-igarchy

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-310-rise-of-the-oiligarchs/


This documentary really is an interesting watch/read for all those that want to know how the modern world has been created and shaped. The history that you have been taught at school, and in the media, is seriously flawed and seriously partial.

It covers the extensive hidden, or at least not well known, history from the mid 1800's to the present day. He shows how the oiligarchs effectively control all of the following industries:

* Oil industry and all its offshoots
* Banking and finance
* Education and learning
* Health and pharmaceuticals
* Agribusiness, food production and consumption

Just about everything important in other words.

"In the nineteenth century, railroad conspiracies and predatory pricing had been enough to assure the oiligarchs’ monopoly. But by the time that the British crown, the Dutch royal family, the Rothschilds and the other European oiligarchs began opening up the Middle East and the Far East to oil exploration in the early twentieth century, the goal was no longer to maximize profits or control the oil industry. It was not even to control international diplomacy. It was to control and shape the world itself. Its resources. Its environment. And its people."

Who are the oiligarchs? The Rockefellers were the first. As above, the Rothschilds, British Crown [Temple or Queen? Both I guess], Dutch royal family, and others, soon followed. They are oil based monopoly capitalists of the very worst kind. In the words of John D Rockefeller "Competition is a sin". And, on this definition at least then, they are not sinners. But they are scumbags par excellence, that is for sure. The scumbag elites who call all the shots.

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-310-rise-of-the-oiligarchs/

As usual there are plenty of source links in the transcript.

I learned some fascinating stuff here, including:


1. How the oiligarchs suppressed the, very easy to produce, ethanol [alcohol] as a vehicle fuel. Ethanol can be produced from any fermenting vegetable matter and so could be produced anywhere to meet the local fuel requirement. The model T Ford was multi fuel; it could use petrol or alcohol. There is virtually no pollution from alcohol too. Their solution was simple: Prohibition! There was definitely the need to reduce alcohol drinking at the time, which was undoubtedly excessive. But prohibition was obviously utterly ridiculous; it was bound to fail because drinking is such a social pastime that millions enjoy. Just like Mary Jane is.

Certainly prohibition was very convenient for the oiligarchs. It helped them consolidate their oil based fuel supply monopoly to the rapidly expanding automobile industry.


2. How the oiligarchs bought all the US cities electric tramways, and then dismantled them to replace them with buses:

"“By the end of the 1940s, GM had bought and scrapped over one hundred municipal electric transit systems in 45 cities and put gas-burning GM buses on the streets in their place. By 1955 almost 90% of the electric streetcar lines in the United States had been ripped out or otherwise eliminated.”


3. How the oiligarchs deliberately engineered the oil shocks of the 1970's, to raise the price by 400%. They agreed their strategy at 1973's Bilderberg meeting. Then delegated to Henry Kissinger, Rockefellers bagman and US Secretary of State, who engineered the Yom Kippur war in Israel, which facilitated the creation of Opec and the massive price hike.

Anyone who lived through that period knew who was responsible, or at least thought that they did. Their media blamed the mooslim ayrabs. Those damned ayrabs holding us all to ransom. It was the early stage of their demonising of all muslims.

"Five months later, Bilderberg attendee and Rockefeller protege Henry Kissinger, acting as Nixon’s Secretary of State, engineered the Yom Kippur War and provoked OPEC’s response: an oil embargo of the US and other nations that had supported Israel. On October 16, 1973, OPEC raised oil prices by 70%. At their December meeting, the Shah of Iran demanded and received a further price raise to $11.65 a barrel, or 400% of oil’s pre-crisis price. When asked by Saudi King Faisal’s personal emissary why he had demanded such a bold price increase, he replied: “Tell your King, if he wants the answer to this question, he should go to Washington and ask Henry Kissinger.”

Kissinger was famously one of the managers of the Vietnam war too. For which he got the Nobel Peace Prize. A bit like Obomber did. The difference being that Kissinger managed his wars before he got the prize. With Obomber it was the other way round

If you watch/read the piece by James then you will see that the Nobel family crop up a few times too. They are oiligarchs too. But hey, they must be good guys, they created their famous philanthropic "prizes" didn't they    :-))


Lets just think about Kissinger and co for a minute.

* Nixon was the US President.
* Kissinger was the US Foreign Secretary [Secretary of State] appointed by Nixon, but in reality a Rockefeller operative. [He still is]
* The oiligarchs decided that war was necessary in the ME so they instructed Kissinger to set it up.
* Kissinger posed as a peacemaker, but was really a warmonger; all of us who were half awake then knew that at least.
* Kissinger did as instructed and set up the war by his friends in Israel. The Israelis were happy to oblige, they always love to kill ayrabs. They have been doing that for over 60 years now. Israel is Rothschildistan in reality, even down to their flag which is a Rothschild invention.


What price politicians in this system? Nixon was irrelevant although nominally the boss. Do you think that it is any different now? I don't. I think that it still works exactly the same way. And that it is the same system in the UK & all of EU.

Who do you think funds all these politicians, overtly or covertly, including Labour? Corporations. Who owns all the big corporations? The oiligarchs. Bit of a clue there.

And yet people still believe that voting for these puppets makes a difference. 60% of Brits voted in the last general election ffs. Wtf for? Don't vote, it just legitimises them. They could not maintain the pretense if nobody voted.


What price the main media in this system? Did they ever tell us about Kissinger being a Rockefeller stooge? No they did not. Do you think that they didn't know? Of course they knew. Anyone could find out if they did a bit of research like James did.

But to reveal it probably meant instant dismissal. Just the same now I expect. For mainstream journalists the truth about some subjects is strictly off limits at pain of losing your job. For example 9/11.

What is even worse many people still believe the shite that the main media spews out. Well, lots do anyhow. Lots have already wised up thank god. Personally I think that you need to question everything that they tell you. Every single thing. My default mode is that they are always lying in some way. Even if only by omission. 


Back to the the piece, there is far more including:


4. How the oiligarchs took over the US education system and then deliberately dumbed it down. Before their malign influence there was a very high literacy rate in the US. They require a compliant uneducated populace to "farm".

In their own words:

"“In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or science. We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply.”

Wow! We have an ample supply of politicians! Proof positive from the horses mouth  :-))

And more from James:

"But a nation of individuals who could think for themselves was anathema to the monopolists. The oiligarchs needed a mass of obedient workers, an entire class of people whose intellect was developed just enough to prepare them for lives of drudgery in a factory. Into the midst stepped John D. Rockefeller with his first great act of public charity: the establishment of the University of Chicago."

and

"Although Rockefeller’s resources weren’t exactly limitless, they might as well have been. In 1902 he established the General Education Board to help implement Gates’ vision for the country school of tomorrow with a staggering $180 million endowment.

The Rockefeller influence on education was felt almost immediately, and it was amplified by help from fellow monopolists of the era who were approaching the topic of philanthropy from the same angle."

Wow again. $180 million in 1902. Serious dosh in those days. Equivalent to $billions now.

It is clear to old timers like me that the same story applies here in UK as well. As usual we get there a bit later than the US, but there is no doubt in my mind that the same dumbing down of education has occurred here too.

The Liberal Arts based education has the primary goal of teaching the student how to think for them self. It surely should be the primary objective of any good schooling.


Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric are the Trivium, the base of learning. Wikipedia:
"The Trivium is a systematic method of critical thinking used to derive factual certainty from information perceived with the traditional five senses: sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell. The trivium was the lower division of the seven liberal arts, and comprised grammar, logic, and rhetoric (input, process, and output)"


Arithmetic, geometry, music and astronomy are the Quadrivium, the number skills. Wikipedia:
"the quadrivium may be considered to be the study of number and its relationship to physical space or time: arithmetic was pure number, geometry was number in space, music number in time, and astronomy number in space and time."

The only way to get a proper Liberal Arts education at school here in the UK is if you pay for it. Most of the UK public [typically British wording, they are actually private fee paying] schools use these subjects as their base for learning, and actually teach pupils how to think for them self. The state doesn't want that. Nor do the oiligarchs. It's in neither of their interests.



5. How the oilgarchs took over western medicine and doctors. And created the pharamceutical industry which they own, and which has marginalised natural medicine. Which is of course difficult, if not impossible, to effectively monetise.

"Pharmaceuticals provided a lucrative new opportunity for the oiligarchs, but in a turn-of-the-century America that was still largely based on naturopathic, herbal remedies, it was a tough sell. The oiligarchy went to work changing that."

and

"In 1901 John D. established the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. The Institute recruited Simon Flexner, a pathology professor at the University of Pennsylvania, to serve as its director. His brother, Abraham, was an educator who was contracted by the Carnegie Foundation to write a report on the state of the American medical education system. His study,The Flexner Report, along with the hundreds of millions of dollars that the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations were to shower on medical research in the coming years, resulted in a sweeping overhaul of the American medical system. Naturopathic and homeopathic medicine, medical care focused on un-patentable, uncontrollable natural remedies and cures was now dismissed as quackery; only drug-based allopathic medicine requiring expensive medical procedures and lengthy hospital stays was to be taken seriously."

The big pharma money centered US medical system is well known. But just because our UK system is socialised does not make it any less of a money drain into pharma. The pharma capture of doctors is all encompassing here in the UK. They often act like pharma reps now. Rarely a physical examination. Just stare at a screen and then print a 'script.

Natural cures are never ever offered. Despite the fact that they are far more relevant for many conditions. Got a snotty nose? Here have some antibiotics. Got an unruly child? Here have some Ritalin.


There is far more in the piece.


James finishes by explaining that the oiligarchs have big plans for the future too. All our futures in fact.

"But the oiligarchs are not done yet. Their next project, launched in the late 20th century, is almost too ambitious to be comprehended. It is not about oil. It is not about money. It is about the monopolization of life itself. They have spent decades preparing the path for this takeover and marshaled their mind-boggling resources in service of the task.

And the vast majority of the world’s population, still playing the shell game that the oiligarchs perfected and abandoned long ago, are about to fall right into their hands yet again."

Final thoughts:

The scumbag elites virtual 100% ownership of the media is key to their evil ambitions. I mean media in the widest sense, including Hollywood, and all TV output, and all famous academics, and all famous scientists, and all famous artists. If you are famous then you are media owned. How else could you actually be famous? They can make you. Or destroy you.

Can you believe anything that their media tell you? You might do, I certainly don't.

It is so easy for them. Show us a video, or a picture, and it must be real. This is the norm now. We all know about Photoshop etc. But the image is everything.

Witness the ISIS "beheadings". I watched most of them, and I can tell you that they were low grade Hollywood. But they were accepted as real by their main media. And they were swallowed hook, line and sinker by a majority of the people.

"That's right folks don't touch that dial"


[For the conspiracy minded, or if you don't believe me about the main media then, as an example, you should thoroughly research "Stanley Kubrick" and/or "Moon landings". It will take time, but if you spend time to cut through the disinfo fog, and think it through for yourself, then you will be amazed. Here is your starter from the "European Agency for Safety at Sea":

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/

You could even earn $1 million, but I doubt it. Maybe I will post about Kubrick sometime. I will certainly provide you with a view from right down at the bottom of the rabbit hole in an upcoming post]


And:

What about democracy in a world run by the oiligarchs and their mates? It is an almost meaningless concept. These scumbag elites make all the key decisions. Do you seriously believe that Obomber or Cameron have any say in the big issues? I don't. I think that they just read the script from their teleprompter. And try to look concerned when something bad happens.

Same applies to all of the others too, including Jeremy Corbyn; he surely must know all this. Well he did join the Queen's Privy Council didn't he? Another big clue there. One of the big UK oiligarchs own, private and secret, democratic subversion clubs. All past UK leaders have been members too, including all the Labour leaders ffs, all of them.

The Establishment response is so British. "Convention old chap, just ceremonial, no real power". Yeah, sure.

Actors should surely make the best national politicians. That is the main requirement for the job after all.


Finally:

You will recall from my Climate Change post that Maurice Strong, who wrote the CC rules of process for the UN, was a Rockefeller operative, just like Kissinger. He was an oil man who was feted as one of the fathers of climate science. How does that work? Isn't the oil industry supposed to be against climate science?

If you believe their media it is. But not in the real world of the oiligarchs. They own the media.They own all the big corporations and most of the minerals, commodities and utilities. They own all the famous politicians. They control all the transnational political institutions via their place men/women. Like George Carlin said: "It's a big fuckin club. And you ain't in it".

They have all the money that they could possibly ever need. They always make money off both sides of any argument. They own the banks too, so they can create money whenever they want.

It's not about money for them. It's all about human control.


They have plenty ways to exercise that control too. The nation states are controlled by them via their puppets. Even though they have no national allegiance themselves; they truly are "International Monopoly Capitalists".

But there is so much more:

* "Sustainability for the 21st century", and such like, from their UN

* Trans Pacific Partnership [TPP] from their NAFTA

* Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership [TTIP] from their EU

Make no mistake they fully own all those things.



But all this will only work for them if we let it.

By believing what their corrupt media tells us.

By voting for their corrupt politicians, and thereby giving them our consent.


They really do fear our awakening. We outnumber them massively.

We know in our hearts that our world is on the wrong path. That we cannot carry on like this.

It is up to us really.



https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-310-rise-of-the-oiligarchs/

The Wizard of Oz

Or

How the fascist globalist scumbag elites con us all

I already told you about the Crown Temple, in the City of London, in my earlier Legalism/Strawman post:
http://petefairhurst.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/legalism-your-strawman-and-you.html



The simple Wizard of Oz allegory tells you how the world really works, in some important respects. It is all hidden in plain sight as usual in our holographic "reality".


"The story of the Wizard of Oz is an allegorical representation of the Crown Temple, the controlling force behind the British Crown and all its foreign offshoots (Commonwealth countries) including the United States of America which is proven never to have really been given independence from the Crown, despite all appearances to the contrary. It tells us the covert story of who we are, our place in the New World Order and how we can end its oppression.

Although dressed-up as merely a simple, innocent children’s story written by L. Frank Baum, in fact ‘Oz’ represents gold by weight (shortened form of ounces) and the yellow brick road, bricks or ingot bars of gold. So, the ‘Wizard of Oz’ himself is one of the Elite banksters, the owners of wealth and one of the ‘powers-that-be’ who tightly control every aspect of our day to day existence.

The character known as the scarecrow or ‘straw-man’ represents your non-existent, ALL-CAPITALS legal-fiction straw-man, in other words, the PERSON that the State created as a legal representation of you with the same spelling as your birth name in order to subjugate and control you.

And what does the straw man want most of all from the Wizard of Oz? A brain. A ‘legal fiction’ PERSON does not have a brain because a ‘capitalised’ PERSON is not a living entity but all that the straw-man receives from the ‘great’ Oz is a certificate, a Birth Certificate perchance, as a newly ‘legalised’ entity – as indeed we are all regarded in the eyes of the State. He is so proud of his new ‘legal’ status, plus all the other legalisms he is graciously granted by Oz, that he lives up to his character as the brainless sack of straw, proudly clutching his Birth Certificate and defying all common sense.

This tells us much about the state of affairs today and the mind-set of the utterly brainless populace duped into believing that they have rights of freedom from servitude.

Likewise the tin man.

TIN is the US Taxpayer Identification Number. The poor TIN Man is simply a mindless, robot-like worker striving to fulfil his master’s wishes until his body literally seizes-up and stops functioning. He will eventually work himself to death because he has neither a heart nor soul and is merely just an emotion-less creature robotically carrying out his daily tasks as if he were already dead.

He is the horse pulling the carriages of the wealthy and the mule toiling under the yoke of slavery. His masters keep him numb on the outside and heartless on the inside in order to control him totally. He is the physical representation of the millions of soulless entities that throughout the ages are born, serve the system from cradle to grave and die miserably in poverty.

The pitiful Cowardly Lion is always too scared to stand up for himself. Of course, he is a bully and picks on those smaller and less powerful than himself. He represents those people who on the outside appear to possess great courage, but in reality have none at all, the kind of person who will bully his way to a minor position of authority but who is really too much of a coward to stand up to those at the apex of the pyramids. The Cowardly Lion will always back down and whimper when anyone of higher status challenges him. He desperately wants to be granted courage by the great Wizard, so he is awarded the ‘medal’ of ‘official recognition’ by the powers that be. These people thereby remain loyal to our oppressors in return for a few crumbs from the metaphorical table.

They are the armies of bullies with ‘official’ status who hide behind their ‘officially’ recognised authority and the lion represents people such as politicians, the military, the police and security forces and the legal profession who first and foremost protect the Masters of the Universe and their status and power, from the masses.

The character of Dorothy represents the ubiquitous ‘everyman’ on his / her journey through life trying to find happiness and contentment, in Dorothy’s case her trying to get home to Kansas.

The two witches, Glinda the good witch and the Wicked Witch of the West, represent the perennial struggle between good and evil. The Wicked Witch of the West is a parody of western society and its appalling values. All she cares about is procuring the legendary ‘silver slippers’ (changed to ruby slippers in the film version) belonging originally to her sister and given to Dorothy by Glinda, which she believes will increase her powers. ‘Silver slippers’ represents the wealth of the masses, that is silver the precious metal, representing our meagre wealth and our constant chasing of illusory dreams whilst the Elite do everything they can to deprive us of a share of the world’s bounty.

The journey through the field of poppies represents the fact that the Crown (and to a lesser extent the US and UK governments) control the world-wide drug trade and has done so for centuries. Even in Baum’s day, more than a century ago, there had been the long and oppressive Opium Wars. The Crown already had vast experience, for example in the conquering of all of China with drugs, so why not the rest of the world?

And it was Toto, Dorothy’s small dog who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was. ‘In toto’ in Latin means ‘in total, all together’ and it is significant that Toto is not scared of the Wizard’s posturing, despite his diminutive stature.

The Wizard’s smoke, flames and holographic projections and booming voice are simply designed to frighten us (we the masses) into doing his every bidding. ‘Toto,’ representing us ‘all’ (when we get our collective acts together) simply looks behind the curtain, sees that it is all one big illusion and begins barking to draw it to the attention of the others (the rest of the world). This enables them to see the Wizard as he really is; just an ordinary, vulnerable, defeat-able man controlling the levers that create the illusion of his non-existent power and authority.

So, metaphorically the veil hiding the truth behind the ultimate flimsiness of the New World Order is removed and the Wizard’s illusion is easily exposed.

And the moral of the story?

We as a group do not realise how much power we really have, to expose and thereby end the current state of affairs. If we all bark loud enough, we too can draw the attention of the rest of humanity to the scam being perpetrated by the fraudsters and criminal banksters who control the world and our every move.

In reality, their façade is every bit as flimsy as the one erected by the seemingly ‘all-powerful’ Wizard behind the curtain. All we need is a brain, a heart, a soul and courage and if we can learn to somehow work together ‘in toto,’ we can change the world."


Go Toto, go!!

The film The Matrix is another that gives you some very strong clues, along similar lines. Did you take the blue pill or the red? I swallowed the blue for most of my life. But I spat it out a few years ago and swallowed the red instead. And I feel so much better for it. Things make so much more sense now.

Please take some time to think about all that. Give it your sense test. Does it make sense to you? No? You must have taken the blue pill .


Never mind all that. Just keep watching the "news" and Strictly and the X Factor. Or whatever the current drivel is. "That's right folks, don't touch that dial"    :-))



Source: http://chrisspivey.org/john-hamers-the-wizard-of-oz/

Spivey might sometimes seem like the unpleasant "right wing conspiracy theorist" that some people claim that he is. But hey, you can't always have everything that you wish for can you. I think that his heart is very much in the right place; his extensive archive stands as testimony to that. Despite the fact that a court forced him to take down some of his best work.

One thing is for sure, at least for those with a twisted sense of humour like my bro, he is sometimes very funny too. Just have a look at the pictures on that link.

And, when you get underneath it all, the standard of his work really is excellent. He is fearless and has stood almost alone against the power, and the very dirty tricks, of the state. A very tough place to be for anybody.

Unless he's a spook of course. I hasten to add that, after reading a fair bit of his stuff, I don't think that he is a spook. But only he and his daughter really know which it is. After all is said and done, all of his work is in the hologram too isn't it. Just like this is   :-))

Global Warming. Or is that Climate Change?

Or is that a steaming pile of Globalist Horseshit?

It seems that it may be the latter.

I've realized for a long time that there are whole series of questions and problems about the "official" line, the so called "settled science", of the Global Warming/Climate Change story. [GW/CC]


My initial red flag came when it became clear to me that the overwhelming focus of the climate scientists tends to distract from all the other serious environmental issues that we have in the modern world today, viz
* Chemical pollution
* Agricultural pollution, including GMO's
* Nuclear pollution
* Pharmaceutical pollution
* Electromagnetic pollution
and more.

All these issues seem to take a back seat compared with the climate bogey. All of them receive far far less attention than they deserve. All of them are potentially as serious in their negative effects on human beings. Does the focus on GW/CC distract from the focus on all these other issues? Well they certainly get far less coverage that's for sure.

To cite just one example: the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan. At least one of the 3 destroyed reactors has a meltdown of it's radioactive core. The nuclear fuel is somewhere in the ground underneath the reactor. The radiation is so intense that it destroys all modern equipment used to detect its whereabouts. So the Pacific ocean is being contaminated every single day by massive amounts of radioactivity washed into the sea by groundwater running under the site. Four years on and nobody knows how to properly deal with the catastrophe. But the main media silence is deafening.


My next red flag was when I noticed that the GW/CC story was being driven relentlessly by the United Nations, the globalist elites political playground. The global elites vehicle for their New World Order, their Global Government, if you like. So you've got to ask yourself: is this GW/CC story entirely kosher? The logical answer: if these people are the key proponents then, probably not. They profess concern for humanity, but everything that they say and do tells you that you cannot take them on face value. Anyone who studies their methods and agendas soon realizes that there are strong hidden undercurrents that are not to humanities benefit.

But don't take my word for it, try researching their Agenda 21 for example, their "Sustainability" agenda. There is loads of stuff on t'interweb that deconstructs their hidden agenda contained within. And it isn't good for ordinary people that's for sure. It's all dressed up with fine sounding words of course, but the hidden intentions are usually ominous. In a nutshell: Increased control by them of all of humanity, including far less freedom for individuals, dressed up as save the planet. Of course the official supporters label these concerns as "right wing conspiracy theory". Hopefully most readers will have already learned that this slur is commonly used to vilify truth seekers who hit a real nerve.

Anyhow back to GW/CC.


The next big red flag for me was when I realized that there is absolutely no empirical evidence that CO2 is the cause of the so called Global Warming or Climate Change. No empirical evidence whatsoever! What do I mean by this? Well true science starts with the search for empirical evidence, the incontrovertible proof of the theory. GW/CC scientists present none at all! None!

You might be surprised to read that given all the hype that they pump out. The fact is that their so called "settled science" that the so called "warming" is caused by increasing CO2 in the atmosphere depends on correlation. They show you graphs that demonstrate the growth of temperature, and the growth of CO2, since the industrial revolution. And then say that they correlate, that the increase in CO2 is the cause of the increased temperature of the planet. This is not proof! It is only circumstantial, and not empirical, evidence. Ask any scientist if correlation is empirical. They will tell you no, that correlation is only circumstantial, it proves nothing! It is, at best, a clue. But it is not proof. The graphs themselves have been thoroughly debunked numerous times. But their mainstream media never told you that did they?


Another red flag is the fact that the Earth has not actually warmed at all for the past 18+ years! That's right, the Earth has not got any hotter for the past 18+ years. Despite the fact that CO2 has most definitely increased in that time. And the globalist GW/CC proponents at the UN, and in their main media, know that this is true. But the story continues to be spun the same way. Why do you think that Global Warming became Climate Change all of a sudden? Is it because there has been no actual warming for that long? Of course it is! Again their media never told you that did it.  :-))

Source: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/12/04/the-robust-pause-resists-a-robust-el-nio-still-no-global-warming-at-all-for-18-years-9-months/


So the red flags are starting to pile up, and I've just scratched the surface so far. I could say a lot lot more. But I will limit myself to a few more summary points, viz

* The fact that the climate scientists much quoted predictive models, the ones that they base their warming/change prediction theories on, have totally, utterly, failed. The real world has never, ever, matched their predictions, after over 20 years of predictions. But that doesn't put them off. The elites just tell their paid for scientists and mainstream media to keep spinning, but to keep quiet about this fact. "Shush, the plebs might realize".

* The fact that their Climate Change story is a massive money spinner for the global elites. Their carbon cap and trade is worth hundreds of millions, in fact billions, probably trillions of $. It mainly comes from the tax levies on your, and everybody else's, utility bill. Most of which goes into the pockets of those same global elites. Those same elites who own all the companies that are responsible for all that pollution that I mentioned earlier. "Shush. Just keep paying your taxes. Not that you've got a choice".

* The fact that CO2, which the climate scientists at the UN label as a pollutant, is actually an essential plant nutrient. Plants thrive when there is more CO2 in the air. How can a few extra parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere be called pollution? "Shush. Let's not worry about nuclear, chemical, pharma, agricultural or industrial, ie. real, pollution"

* What about the fact that the label Climate Change itself is such an obvious truism, the opposite of Climate Stasis. Of course it changes! Who would ever think that the climate stays the same? Only an idiot surely.


Time for the common sense test I think. Please try and forget all your main media GW/CC conditioning for a few minutes. And use your common sense to rank the following in importance as agents for Climate Change here on Earth:

1. The Cosmos
2. The Sun
3. The Earths Biosphere
4. The Earths Geology
5. A few extra parts per million of CO2 in the Earths atmosphere

What does your common sense tell you?


Suffice to say that Global Warming/Climate Change is starting to sound a bit like a religion don't you think? Based on theory, or belief. No empirical evidence. Archbishops, bishops and vicars in the established church. All of them with a direct vested interest, or on the payroll in some way or other.

You've just got to believe :-))

So are you a believer? Maybe you have been baptised into the religion by reading too much by George Monbiot and his pals in "The Grauniad", the one time left leaning, now unashamedly NeoCon, so called newspaper.

The same George Monbiot whose categorical support for the ludicrous "pancake collapse" theory of the collapse of the 3 towers in New York on 9/11 was the subject of one of his pieces a few years ago. You know, the 3 towers [World Trade 1, 2 &7] that collapsed after being hit by 2 planes on 21st September 2001. The only skyscrapers in the whole history of the world ever to collapse due to fires. And all on the same day. Big red flag for George there wouldn't you say. Whose side is he really on?


Now I'm going to be lazy, and point you to a far far better researcher, writer and resource than I could ever be: James Corbett of The Corbett Report.

An independent, alternative, journalist/commentator of the highest integrity. One of the most highly regarded, strictly non mainstream ie. alternative, sources on the planet. James is certainly no "Conspiracy Theorist". He provides evidential links for all his assertions. And he always asks you to do your own research, using his links as the starting point if you want.

James has been running a series of pieces on the Global Warming/Climate Change story this past week or so. To coincide with the current Paris Climate Change summit. It was seeing these pieces that prompted me to write this. They make very interesting watching/reading, whether you have bought in to the religion, or not.

Here are his pieces so far:

A message to the Environment movement
An old Corbett Report from 2009, but still relevant today
https://www.corbettreport.com/a-message-to-the-environmental-movement-hd/

Lies, damn lies and global warming statistics
False data presentation in the mainstream media and the climate science orgs like NASA, World Meteorological Organisation. "Statistically indistinguishable from zero"
https://www.corbettreport.com/lies-damned-lies-and-global-warming-statistics/

Take the $100k Global Warming believer challenge
You could win $100k if you can prove it. You've got no chance
https://www.corbettreport.com/take-the-100000-global-warming-believer-challenge/

Won't someone think of the polar bears 
Ahh aren't they lovely cuddly bears - not
https://www.corbettreport.com/wont-someone-think-of-the-polar-bears/

Maurice Strong is dead
Maurice Strong wrote the UN Climate Change rules of process. He was an oilman ffs! Bit of a clue there wouldn't you say. I strongly recommend that you watch/read this piece. No pun intended
https://www.corbettreport.com/maurice-strong-is-dead/

What is the average global temperature
Or how they fiddle the temperature records
https://www.corbettreport.com/what-is-the-average-global-temperature/

Climate Change is unfalsifiable woo woo pseudoscience
Karl Popper and his theory of falsification
https://www.corbettreport.com/climate-change-is-unfaslifiable-woo-woo-pseudoscience/


Take your pick. You will definitely learn something.

And, if you are a confirmed believer in the climate change religion, then you may want to rethink somewhat, or at least do a bit more research for yourself. In that case my tip for you is: Don't start with The Guardian  :-))

Addendum #1 12th December 2015

The Climate Change summit is about to agree a deal according to their main media.

Here are the key players mentioned by the main media presstitutes this morning.

Francois Hollande - French president
Ban-Ki Moon - UN chief
Laurent Fabius - French foreign minister
Barak Obama - US president
Xi Juinping - Chinese leader
John Kerry - US secretary of state
Narendra Modi - Indian prime minister

A more disreputable cast would be hard to imagine.

Every single one of them a globalist lackey. Do you really think that any of these people give a damn about human beings? Their past record speaks for itself. You couldn't trust any one of them as far as you could throw them. Most have them have got copious amounts of blood on their hands from their numerous misdeeds.


One glance at this cast of megalomaniacs tells you all that you need to know about the Climate Change story.

Addendum #2 16th December 2015

The same message as my piece but rather more elegantly written.

Ecological Panic: The New Rationale For Globalist Cultism

http://alt-market.com/articles/2764-ecological-panic-the-new-rationale-for-globalist-cultism

"Faith in an ideology based on a desire for power over others and the need to feel personally superior without any legitimate accomplishment is perhaps the most dangerous state of being an individual or society can adopt. I would refer to such a mindset as “zealotry,” an integral element of cultism and an extreme result of the elitist side of faith.

Zealotry and cultism are not limited to the realm of the religious. Zealotry is a clever devil hiding in the woodwork of any political or academic construct, and this includes the scientific community when it strays away from empirical logic and honest data into a world of pseudoscience and social engineering. I cannot think of a better example of zealotry feeding scientific cultism than the highly propagandized climate change/global warming movement.

Anthropogenic (man-made) global warming is quickly becoming the overarching rationale for almost every policy toward global centralization, as well as a scapegoat for nearly every major crisis from mass shootings and the rise of ISIS to geopolitical shifts in economic structures. Global warming has been projected as a magical force deviously underlying everything. It is presented by climate scientists and activists as an all-encompassing behemoth of cause and effect, yet nearly all of this frantic pontificating is supported by faith, rather than hard data."

Addendum #3 31st January 2016

A follow up from James Corbett.

Meet Maurice Strong

https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-maurice-strong-globalist-oiligarch-environmentalist/


"There is no doubt that Strong led a charmed life. And given the persistent presence of Rockefeller interests in that life from his earliest years, there is no doubt why doors seemed to open for him wherever in the world he went.

But still, one has to ask how and why a high school dropout who made it big in the oil patch thanks to his big oil connections would go on to become the single most important figure in the international environmental movement. Was he genuinely interested in protecting the environment?"

Rockefeller, big oil and the environment movement? Of course. That is how the fascist globalist elites operate.


Addendum #4 13 March 2019

Mother Nature demands child sacrifice:

"The propagandists are in overdrive shoving “climate grief” down our collective throats. And the next step in that indoctrination, the acceptance of climate eugenics to atone for our climate sins, is almost here. Join James for this week’s important edition of #PropagandaWatch dissecting the dangerous lies that are being pushed in the name of the environment."

https://www.corbettreport.com/mother-nature-demands-child-sacrifice-propagandawatch/